Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Saranda

Saranda

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Gjirokastra15 (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. Athenean (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. Himara (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
2. Saranda (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• [[Talk:Saranda #I disagree with this edit]]
• [[Talk:Himara #I disagree with this edit]]

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

User Athenean is POV pushing based on extreme nationalistic sentiments without ever compromising or looking at the facts . Regarding Saranda , that phrase does not merit to be in the lead because : see the talk page here . It is of interest to note that here in the WP:DRN regarding himara , he is claiming wp:lede , yet he removes only the facts that he does not like as per wp:idontlikeit in order to continue with the POV pushing agenda . I would kindly ask for a formal meditation because i believe that this refusal of consensus based on the 'i have the number of reverts' is a huge abuse of wikipedia transforming it into a medium for propaganda and territorial claims based on totally false premises and completely ignoring and removing arrogantly the sources of the opposing party .

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Gjirokastra15 (talk) 02:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Reject. Fails to meet prerequisite to mediation #3, "The dispute is not exclusively about the behaviour of a Wikipedia editor." Also fails to meet prerequisite #8, "No related dispute resolution proceedings are active in other Wikipedia forums." For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 15:05, 3 December 2014 (UTC) (Chairperson)