Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Danah Boyd

Mediation of this dispute has been completed. The case pages should not be edited.

To report a problem with the outcome of this case, contact the Mediation Committee.
If additional mediation proceedings are required, a new mediation request should be filed.
These case pages should not be edited, even to correct article content problems. Case pages are not indexed by search engines.

Resolved:

Stale, discussion exhausted

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

Danah Boyd

view edit delete watch
Filed: 23:52, June 26 2007 (UTC)

Involved parties

Articles involved

Danah Boyd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted

Extensive discussion at Talk:Danah Boyd
Requests for comment at Wikipedia:Administrators noticeboard [1][2]
Requested move debate at article talkpage
Request for comment at WP:BLPN#Danah Boyd

Issues to be mediated

Whether or not the article should be named "Danah Boyd" or "danah boyd"
Whether the subject's name within the text of the article should be listed as "Danah Boyd" or "danah boyd"

Additional issues to be mediated

Additional issue 1
Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "agree" or "disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed.

Agree. --El on ka 23:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. — Carl (CBM · talk) 23:59, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Ubernostrum 01:29, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. - Cyrus XIII 01:30, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Wickethewok 01:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. -- Renesis (talk) 04:20, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Neier 09:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. –Dan Hoey^talk 13:48, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Parties' agreement to Riana's offer

Riana (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), an experienced administrator one of the most friendly and intelligent users I've ever met, has accepted an offer/plea to take this case to help out the Mediation Committee with their backlog. However, as Riana is not a member of the Committee at the moment, it is a generally accepted practice that the parties must consent to a non-Committee member mediating a RfM.

As such, can I ask that all parties to the mediation please list whether they "agree" or "disagree" to Riana mediating below, in much the same format as the initial agreement above.

Please note that if consent isn't given by all parties above within seven days, then you will have to wait for a Committee mediator, which could take a fair while at the present rate. On all accounts, I encourage you to take Riana's offer, however the choice is, of course, yours.

For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 02:39, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agree - Neier 13:43, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Wickethewok 16:46, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree --El on ka 18:36, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. - Cyrus XIII 21:21, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Ubernostrum 01:42, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree -- Renesis (talk) 06:12, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. — Carl (CBM · talk) 19:38, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. –Dan Hoey^talk 13:49, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.

Accept.

For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 10:28, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.