Wikipedia:Peer review/Tiësto/archive1

Tiësto

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for September 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to know how the current article is, how it reads, if it is too much or too little, if it should be broken down or in any way improved. It is currently a good article and would like it to become a featured article. Any comments or suggestions are welcome on improving the article.

Thanks, A State Of Trance (talk) 17:11, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ruhrfisch comments: Very briefly, here are some suggestions for improvement. If you want more comments, please ask here.

Article needs a copyedit for prose - professional level writing is an FA requirement. One example When he was twenty he decided to dedicate more time to it and began DJing professionally at school parties and then moved on to become a resident DJ between 1985 and 1994 at several clubs in the Netherlands after his manager and friend Wilfred encouraged him.[10][11] - could be split into two sentences or cleaned up. Copyeditors are at WP:PRV

Done Split up sentence. ASOTMKX (talk) 01:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is IMDB a Relaible source?

Done Removed IMDB as a source. ASOTMKX (talk) 01:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Four non-free images - do they all meet WP:NFCC?

Done These images have been removed. ASOTMKX (talk) 01:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is a one sentence paragraph During 2005 he also made a small cameo appearance in the award-winning film It's All Gone Pete Tong as himself.[81] could it be combined with another or expanded?

Done ASOTMKX (talk) 01:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The lead should be an accessible and inviting overview of the whole article. Nothing important should be in the lead only - since it is a summary, it should all be repeated in the body of the article itself. My rule of thumb is to include every header in the lead in some way. Please see WP:LEAD

Done Rewrote the lead, tried to have an overview of the article. ASOTMKX (talk) 01:14, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 01:57, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]