Wikipedia:Peer review/21st Century Breakdown/archive1

21st Century Breakdown

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to promote it to FA status, but since I don't have much article editing experience I do not know what exactly needs to be done to it for it to be promoted. 21st Century Breakdown is a well-known (perhaps worldwide) album by Green Day so it's notable enough to qualify for FA status.

Thanks, Addihockey11 (talk) 02:20, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note to nominator: You are not an active editor on this article. You say you'd "like to promote it FA status"; but you have not, as far as I can see, discussed this possibility with the article's main editor, User:IllaZilla, who has more than 300 edits to the article, the most recent on 9 November. You are brand new to Wikipedia (9 edits in total); I think that you could use a bit more experience of editing before trying to steer an article through FA. If you would like to work on this article and help bring it to FA quality, I suggest that you post a message on the article's talkpage, offering your services as a helper to this end, and see what transpires. Brianboulton (talk) 00:53, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Finetooth comments: I agree with Brianboulton's comments above. As far as the article goes, I don't see much to complain about, although I don't know enough to say whether it's comprehensive or not. Here are a very few suggestions for improvement.

Citation 2 is incomplete.

The link checker at the top of this review page finds four dead urls in the citations.

Citations 71, 75, 80, 82, 89, and apparently 101 and 104 are incomplete.

The date formatting in citations 101 and 102 are nonconforming; that is, they do not use the same formatting as the other citations.

I fixed a very few minor prose and style problems.

The image licenses look fine to me.

I hope these suggestions prove helpful. If so, please consider reviewing another article, especially one from the PR backlog at WP:PR; that is where I found this one. I don't usually watch the PR archives or check corrections or changes. If my comments are unclear, please ping me on my talk page. Finetooth (talk) 03:35, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]