Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Bamiyan Buddha
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2012 at 00:13:49 (UTC)
- Reason
- Irreplaceable photo of what is now a UNESCO World Heritage site, decent resolution. People add to scale.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Buddhas of Bamiyan (in the form of File:Taller Buddha of Bamiyan before and after destruction.jpg, to which it's hyperlinked)
- FP category for this image
- Artwork/Sculpture
- Creator
- uncredited
- Support as nominator --Brandmeistertalk 00:13, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm not sure I am happy supporting a file which is not actually used in the article... J Milburn (talk) 23:58, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
- The file is linked to its collage version, which is used, so I decided to give it a go. Brandmeistertalk 09:13, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Licencing needs figured out, the license on it is clearly wrong. — raekyt 02:12, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- Can you be more specific as to the problem? The current template used seems to fit Unesco's simple claim "unrestricted." Chick Bowen 05:28, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- It say's unknown photographer/source? There is no copyright in Afghanistan, so {{PD-Afghanistan}}? Where is the source on Unesco's website with the copyright statement? I can't find the image on there... — raekyt 07:31, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- The statement is here (upper right corner, below the statue), the source is on a different url. Brandmeistertalk 09:13, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- Seems it's unrestricted due to PD-Afghanistan... but I donno.. seems strange. I don't think they're the photographers of all those different images. — raekyt 17:28, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- The statement is here (upper right corner, below the statue), the source is on a different url. Brandmeistertalk 09:13, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- It say's unknown photographer/source? There is no copyright in Afghanistan, so {{PD-Afghanistan}}? Where is the source on Unesco's website with the copyright statement? I can't find the image on there... — raekyt 07:31, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- Can you be more specific as to the problem? The current template used seems to fit Unesco's simple claim "unrestricted." Chick Bowen 05:28, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Julia\talk 07:49, 4 December 2012 (UTC)