Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of uncrewed NASA missions/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by PresN via FACBot (talk) 08:32:33 15 July 2019 (UTC) [1].

List of uncrewed NASA missions

Featured list candidates/List of uncrewed NASA missions/archive1

Nominator(s): DannyS712 (talk) 15:43, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that it meets the criteria. It was recently peer reviewed (see Wikipedia:Peer review/List of uncrewed NASA missions/archive1) with the only feedback being that it should be nominated. Ideally, I'd like to run it as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Space 2019. Thanks, -- DannyS712 (talk) 15:43, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

The most immediate thing that jumps out is that the lead is far far too short. It should have three good-sized paragraphs, not three sentences.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:17, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Kees08

At a glance I am confused as to what the inclusion criteria is. For example, I suppose there is Landsat 7 mentioned in the EOS section, but no mention of the Landsat program. What have you done to ensure all the uncrewed NASA missions are included here, and if not all of them are included, what is the inclusion criteria? Kees08 (Talk) 17:24, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, there are multiple uncited paragraphs. Once those are properly cited and the above addressed I can continue the review. Kees08 (Talk) 17:25, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to firm up an oppose. The lead is woefully inadequate, and in nearly a fortnight since I highlighted that, nothing has done to address it. I also concur with Kees08's comment that there is a lot of unreferenced content -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:25, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – It's a shame because this is a great topic for an FL, but the lead remains way too short and uncited content is still sprinkled throughout the body of the article. If those issues aren't resolved, this FLC is unlikely to be successful. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:08, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – per ChrisTheDude and Giants2008. – zmbro _(talk) 03:00, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple opposes, with no work done to address after 3 weeks- closing. --Pres N 08:32, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.