Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Kal Ho Naa Ho/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:32, 8 February 2018 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Contents
List of accolades received by Kal Ho Naa Ho (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This article provides a listing of the notable awards and nominations received by the 2003 Indian Hindi romantic drama film, Kal Ho Naa Ho starring Jaya Bachchan, Shah Rukh Khan, Saif Ali Khan and Preity Zinta. This film is notable for garnering its cast and crew members several awards and nominations. It is my twelfth attempt at an accolades FLC, and my first for a Bollywood awards list. Any constructive comments to improve this list are most welcome. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Yashthepunisher
edit- Fullstop missing from alt text.
- Ref 1 of the opening sentence seems redundant.
- Put ref 2 at the end of the sentence.
- Ditto for plot synopsis.
Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The reason why ref no 1 is there is to signify that the film is a romantic drama in case any editor unaware of the subject might post a query about the genre. All the other comments have been resolved, Yashthepunisher — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 14:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Support this nomination. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:16, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you, Yash. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 15:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support from BeatlesLedTV
editSupport – Change "Ref." to "Ref(s)". Other than that I got nothing. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 19:44, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you, BeatlesLedTV. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 06:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Kailash29792
edit- Kal Ho Naa Ho is a 2003 Indian Hindi romantic drama film directed by Nikkhil Advani - write "Hindi-language" to avoid WP:SEAOFBLUE. Also, wikilink "romantic" and "drama" to separate genres (romance film and Drama (film and television)) or write a single link (romantic drama) that takes you to Romance film#Subgenres which still isn't bad per WP:NOTBROKEN.
- The film's dialogues were penned by Niranjan Iyengar - write "written" instead of "penned" because, according to Vensatry (as seen here), the latter term looks idiomatic.
- Shankar-Ehsaan-Loy, Javed Akhtar and Anil Mehta are linked twice in the lead section. Remove the second instance links.
- Any reason why the lead actor has no picture in the infobox? Also, an odd number of picture arranged horizontally makes the infobox looked stretched.
- IIFA Award for Best Movie must be rewritten as IIFA Award for Best Film since that's the article link and award name. --Kailash29792 (talk) 05:42, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I have resolved your comments, Kailash29792. Do let me know if there's anything pending. Thanks. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 06:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- What about the image of the lead actor not being there? ----Kailash29792 (talk) 12:38, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Kailash29792, three of them are there. SRK didn't win any award for the film despite being nominated. The rest have won at least one award. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 13:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: All the best for the FLC pass. --Kailash29792 (talk) 17:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you, Kailash29792. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 06:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: All the best for the FLC pass. --Kailash29792 (talk) 17:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Kailash29792, three of them are there. SRK didn't win any award for the film despite being nominated. The rest have won at least one award. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 13:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- What about the image of the lead actor not being there? ----Kailash29792 (talk) 12:38, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support from Jim
edit- Support from Jim
I saw a couple of very minor issues when i first looked at this some days ago, but they seem to have been addressed since then Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:22, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you, Jimfbleak. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 09:53, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Vedant
edit- "Johar also co-produced the film with his father, Yash Johar, under their home banner, Dharma Productions." - You can start with "The latter"; the phrase "home banner" might not be the best choice either.
- "Anil Mehta, Sanjay Sankla and Sharmishta Roy handled the cinematography, editing and production design respectively." - This isn't very clear either, as to who handled what.
- The plot too could be written with a little more clarity.
The rest look good Ssven2. VedantTalk 10:17, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I have hopefully resolved your comments, Numerounovedant. Do let me know if there's anything pending. Thanks. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I support the nomination, good luck Ssven2. VedantTalk 18:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you, Vedant. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 01:02, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I support the nomination, good luck Ssven2. VedantTalk 18:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Courcelles
editResolved comments from Courcelles (talk) 14:41, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*What written work is ref 24 trying to cite? Same with ref 20. You can't just cite the award ceremony itself, which is what it looks like you're doing.
Courcelles (talk) 22:24, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
|
Comments from The Rambling Man
editResolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 08:45, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 19:56, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
|
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 20:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.