Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of France national football team captains/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 15:01, 8 July 2011 [1].
List of France national football team captains (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): JSRant Away 03:24, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I feel it meets the required featured list criteria and is important to its subject giving the importance of several of the players on the list. JSRant Away 03:24, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 18:47, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments quick ones...
|
- I would reduce the mildly dubious section on a captain's duties here, and increase that which is relevant to France.
- Will take care of this when I got more time. — JSRant Away 23:16, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I removed the section. Doesn't that make the lead a little short though for a FLC? . — JSRant Away 21:51, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Well yes, it does seem short now, at just one paragraph. You could use another para which summarises the history section, e.g. identify first, most recent, most capped, most successful, least successful captains in the lead too. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:21, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Took care of a couple of those mention. Most recent is a tough one because, as of right now, there is no permanent captain. It is currently being rotated at the moment. — JSRant Away 23:02, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Well yes, it does seem short now, at just one paragraph. You could use another para which summarises the history section, e.g. identify first, most recent, most capped, most successful, least successful captains in the lead too. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:21, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I removed the section. Doesn't that make the lead a little short though for a FLC? . — JSRant Away 21:51, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Will take care of this when I got more time. — JSRant Away 23:16, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (27 and counting) 21:08, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
One more from reference 35, which I missed the first time around: the contraction "haven't" should be removed in favor of "have not". Actually, I think this and reference 36 would be more accurately listed as notes, to distinguish them from the citations. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 21:08, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support – Meets FL standards. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 01:03, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support no immediate issues for me. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:35, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. After a read today and a read yesterday, I don't see any issues. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:40, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.