Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Eve episodes/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 26 March 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Eve episodes

Featured list candidates/List of Eve episodes/archive1

Nominator(s): Aoba47 (talk) 23:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone! The following is a list of episodes for Eve, an American television sitcom that revolves around two sets of male and female friends attempting to navigate relationships with the opposite sex. I would greatly appreciate any feedback for this list. Thank you in advance. Aoba47 (talk) 23:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from 1989

The lead looks good. I have no comments for that.

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 23:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see only a few episodes that claim the viewership. If you can't find the ones that are missing, that's fine.

Unfortunately, I cannot find the ratings for the other episodes. Aoba47 (talk) 23:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The summaries of the episodes are pretty short. Maybe expand them?

I have attempted to expand some of the summaries, but unfortunately, I could not do that much as I have never actually watched a single episode of this show. I mostly relied on the episode summaries that were already in the list before I expanded it. Aoba47 (talk) 23:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MCMLXXXIX 23:10, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: I have responded to your comments. Thank you for your input! I greatly appreciate it, and look forward to hearing back from you. Aoba47 (talk) 23:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support @Aoba47: Fair enough. Good work. When you have the chance, could you review my FLC? MCMLXXXIX 00:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: Thank you for your support and I will provide comments for your FLC by the end of tomorrow if that is okay. Aoba47 (talk) 00:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from User:Tintor2

The article looks in really good shape but I wonder why there is no information about the home media release of the series. Is it not applied in this project's guidelines? Anyways, that's the only issue I found besides adding references to every season's introduction. Wikipedia's summaries are written as neutral as possible so I don't why you need help from another source. Ping when you reply me.Tintor2 (talk) 13:19, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Thank you for your comments! I have included information about the home media release of the series in the last sentence of the lead. It was never released on DVD or Blu-ray (most likely due to either lack of demand, the amount of copyrighted music, or a combination of both) and it only received a digital release through iTunes and Amazon.com. This information cannot really be represented in a table as done with physical home media releases, and I am not sure if it would be worth it to create a separate section that would only be repeating a sentence already found in the lead (the iTunes and Amazon releases are just the episodes and do not include any special features or anything else noteworthy). I have removed the references from the summaries per your comment. I need to read through Wikipedia's policies on summaries in the near future. Thank you again and I apologize for the long response. Aoba47 (talk) 14:40, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then, I'll support it. Good work Tintor2 (talk) 16:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 17:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Hello again! I apologize for the random message/ping, but I was wondering if you could do a source review for this. It should be relatively straight-forward, but I understand if you do not have the time. I am just curious as this has been sitting here for a little bit of time and I would like to get some forward progress done on it. Aoba47 (talk) 21:37, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source review.

All sources appear to be reliable and are archived in case we lose the original. I'll support but doesn't the final one lack a wikilink for "TV Art". Then again I'm not too familar with the project. Good work.Tintor2 (talk) 21:56, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 22:30, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support from User:AffeL

Support. The article looks great. I can't seem to find any problems with it. - AffeL (talk) 16:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@AffeL: Thank you for your response and I look forward to working with you further in the future. Aoba47 (talk) 16:41, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Carbrera

On Reference #1, fix the publication link so it is no longer a redirect. Other than that I support this candidate. Carbrera (talk) 06:27, 5 March 2017 (UTC).[reply]

@Carbrera: Thank you for your comment. I have corrected the publication link. Aoba47 (talk) 19:16, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per Carbrera. Eddie891 (talk) 17:18, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 16:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@FLC director and delegates: Just providing a note to the FLC coordinators that I think this is ready for promotion as it has a source review and comments. Aoba47 (talk) 22:32, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll do a review of the list in due course. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:10, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you; I apologize for the inconvenience and pinging you >< Aoba47 (talk) 22:32, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No apology necessary. I'll get to reviewing this as soon as I can, hopefully within the next 24 hours. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:39, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 10:49, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Any reason for the image caption to be centrally aligned?

I copied and pasted the template from another article, and accidentally left in the central alignment. It has been removed. Aoba47 (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

" most often-recurring" looks odd to me, perhaps "most frequently recurring".

Revised. Aoba47 (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Overview table, should that "U.S. viewers" be an "average"? What does the number actually represent?

It should represent the average number of U.S. viewers that watched that seasons. However, after looking at it again, I am not sure if it is necessary and it could be safely removed. What do you think about it? Aoba47 (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

" at the end of Casablanca ." remove space before the full stop.

Revised. Aoba47 (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of episodes have no viewer ratings, perhaps N/A instead of the em-dash.

Good idea, I will complete this by the end of the day. Aoba47 (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Aoba47 (talk) 20:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Original air date references could all be put into the table header instead of repeating the same thing each and every line.

Very true. I was wondering if I could that as it is unnecessarily repetitive as it currently stands. I will also get to this by the end of the day if that is okay. Aoba47 (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Aoba47 (talk) 20:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"doesn't know" avoid contractions, check the other synopses. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:37, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for this. I should have checked this more closely. I believe that I have caught all of them, but I will do another run-through later today when I complete the above two comments. Aoba47 (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: I have addressed all of your comments. Thank you for your help! Aoba47 (talk) 20:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Any updates on this? Aoba47 (talk) 03:34, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. The Rambling Man (talk) 14:55, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.