Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fabergé egg/archive1

Fabergé egg

This article provides wonderful text concerning the history of the Russian Czars. As it is stated in the article, "the eggs are among the masterpieces of the jeweller's art." --LizRice 22:42, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No. The article is 50% list, and far too short for consideration. Nice images though. Harr o5 22:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. There's far more to say on this subject. The article is not sufficiently comprehensive. Pinkville 23:06, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The lead needs to be 2 or 3 paragraphs and summarise the article. The prose is clunky. I am sure there is more factual information and great stories behind these thingies. Also, a whole paragraph of Simpsons trivia doesn't quite fit the article. Still it is a great topic to choose and see how you go...Cas Liber 09:51, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Information to add may include summaries of how much they are valued at now, a little detail on some notable eggs etc. cheers. Cas Liber 09:57, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Almost no article, a list and trivia, not comprehensive. Sandy (Talk) 14:34, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Their has to be more to say on this.... Pigottsm 19:34, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose because it is mostly a list, needs a lot of expanding and it has no ru: interwiki link! Try again later, there is no ru:Яйцо Фаберже article yet. DVD+ R/W 19:35, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the lead is short and says "made by Peter Carl Fabergé" yet the articles on individual eggs say made under the instruction or supervision of Peter Faberge. theres so many red links no history as to why they were made. nothing on the developments to the style over time. limited mention on the materials nothing on how long from concept to production. If you want linked articles on each egg then create basic stubs for them with a general description of them and when made where they, or were last known to be. Gnangarra 12:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much of a list, needs a large amount of expanding to be a featured article. Hello32020 02:42, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]