Zaiisao

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 16:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Understood -- thanks for the info -- zaiisao ^{(talk | contribs)} 14:36, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

June 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. Andre🚐 06:29, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Donald Trump article

Hey, I saw your comment on Donald Trump’s talk page about it being biased. I totally agree with you. It 100% needs a rewrite. It is very sad to see how biased it is towards the left. They only put sources on his page that have left opinions. There are a very small amount of sources on there that display right opinions. I understand that they can put opinions on there, but there should be a more equal amount of sources from both sides, not just dominantly left ones. I only put center point of views online, but it is very clear that Donald Trump’s page needs to be neutralized by putting more right sources on there. I only have about 80 edits, so I need a lot more to get to 500. Once I do, I will try very hard to make the page more equal. Once you get to 500 edits, I hope you will do same. As always, make sure you follow Wikipedia’s guidelines when doing this, so you don’t get blocked from his page. I appreciate the comment that you made and there needs to be more people like that. Thanks. Rane43 (talk) 15:57, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the comment and affirmation, I appreciate it -- zaiisao ^{(talk | contribs)} 08:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC)