User talk:Ylevental/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Welcome

Hello, Ylevental, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Nick—Contact/Contribs 05:18, 5 May 2015 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Nomination of Dixon D. White for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dixon D. White is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dixon D. White until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

WP:3RR

If you continue to restore content against consensus you may lose your ability to edit Wikipedia. Pleaes read the link. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hans Asperger Vienna.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hans Asperger Vienna.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Redrose64 (talk) 18:31, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Hans Asperger Vienna.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hans Asperger Vienna.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:47, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ylevental

Your edits without logging in to History of Asperger syndrome were abusive and constituted sock puppetry. When your IP restored the same material you had added, there is no way for other editors to know that the IP is in fact you. Regardless of your intentions, the edits as an IP avoided scrutiny of your named account. Consider this a warning that if this happens again, you will probably be blocked. Your best course of action is to always log in before editing Wikipedia. If you do that, you shouldn't have a problem from a socking perspective.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:18, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

The best way to make sure you're logged in is to check the "remember me" box. It'll keep you logged into Wikipedia for up to one year, provided you never click "Log out". — Gestrid (talk) 09:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ylevental. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Please read our policies and guidelines

We do not create "criticism" sections in biographies, we do not editorialize about biographical subjects and we do not put massively undue weight into critical material - we strive to balance and reflect reliable sources. I invite you to discuss your proposed additions on the article talk page and gain consensus for them. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 00:19, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neurotribes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Avery. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Donald Triplett

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page https://www.britannica.com/biography/Donald-Triplett. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:51, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Per your edits at the Donald Triplett article, your efforts to avoid infringement of the source copyright (Atlantic Monthly) are commendable but some of the content is still a very close paraphrase of the source, and I've had to remove it. I suggest you work on the text in a sandbox. I've also had to remove what you added to Autism, partly because it carried the same close paraphrasing, and partly because you did not provide an edit summary crediting your copy-pasting from the Wikipedia article on Donald Triplett -- that must be done, even when you've written the source article yourself. Best wishes, Haploidavey (talk) 00:12, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ylevental. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Thomas Clements (Writer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Clements (Writer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Clements (Writer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 01:47, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

In light of this outcome, I have also deleted Thomas Clements (writer). bd2412 T 22:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

I tried to recreate the page, and somebody reviewed it and said it was okay. Maybe I should create a draft first? Ylevental (talk) 23:50, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

WP:MALPLACED pages

Please do not move existing pages with incoming links without obtaining a consensus. Please do not EVER redirect a "foo" title to a "foo (disambiguation)" title. bd2412 T 21:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Okay, I will take note of this. I have to learn the rules about disambiguation pages first. Ylevental (talk) 22:00, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Clements (writer) (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomas Clements (writer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Thomas Clements (writer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 22:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Ylevental! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KJP1 (talk) 22:31, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Re: David Miedzianik

I discovered him after one day reading a few articles about autism on here and have been hooked ever since. Much of what I added was based on info in his online poems (I haven't managed to acquire his autobiography or his printed poems). Heepman1997 (talk) 15:01, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ylevental. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Clements (writer) (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Catrìona was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomas Clements (writer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Thomas Clements (writer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Catrìona (talk) 21:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Question

Hi Ylevental. Why did you want your user page history deleted? PeterTheFourth (talk) 23:08, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

@PeterTheFourth: I didn't want it deleted. I actually woke up and saw that someone requested to delete it, I was surprised...

I believe that this individual requested it, who also requested speedy deletion of this article that I was working on. This person might also go by User:TLPG, located here but I cannot confirm that unfortunately. Can I get my old userpage back? Ylevental (talk) 23:39, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

I made no such request, just for the record. I did request the speedy, because it was previously deleted and for no other reason. Suggest you speak to the admin who deleted it for more information. By the way, Clements isn't notable so don't bother with it. Request deletion of the draft because you'll never get it over the line. Total fail of GNG. 2001:8003:58BD:6A00:5C5:D655:1BC:933C (talk) 01:32, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

I already talked with the admin, and we will see about the Clements article Ylevental (talk) 02:16, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Your userpage was improperly deleted per WP:CSD#G7. That said, it had been blank since 2016. The only benefit to restoring the page is you would then be able to see its revision history. If you wish me to restore it, I will.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:19, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Grunya Sukhareva.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

File:NCSAutismlogo.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:23, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Bias / Conflict of Interest

This user is a friend of both Jonathan Mitchell and Thomas Clements, and is making edits / reverting those of others with the agenda of painting both these people in a positive light and disparaging the Neurodiversity movement.

His work is biased and there is a clear conflict on interest here. Arlandria606 (talk) 07:05, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Just curious, who are you trying to address here? You wrote this in the third person. Just noticed this section now. Ylevental (talk) 01:48, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Qwirkle (talk) 19:33, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3