Wayfarer

This is the place for any questions that you wish to ask, remarks you want to make, disagreements you want to discuss, problems you want to point out (or anything like that). But the rule of thumb is: please be polite, or else you entry might get deleted!

Vandalism

In response to your question on the Wikipedia_talk:Vandalism_in_progress talk page:

It depends on the circumstances. Reading the following may answer your question: Resolving disputes, Requests for arbitration, Three-revert rule. I have found in some edit wars, where there are conflicting points of view, simply rewording the conflicting part in order to reach a middle ground may be successful.

For example

• Joe contends A
• Bill contends B

Rewriting the section to state that "some people believe A, while others believe B" or something along those lines may help resolve the dispute.

-- BMIComp (talk) 5 July 2005 00:52 (UTC)

Re: Vandalism

bmicomp, thank you very much for the links to those Wiki explanation-pages and also sorry for a quite delayed response. Also, I must emphasize that I agree with you about the edit wars - one could simply edit the article (and end the respective edit war) in a manner that it would offer two explanations, two points of view.

regards Wayfarer | on July 20, 2005 | at 1:51 GMT

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
• If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Ragib 30 June 2005 23:06 (UTC)

Re: Welcome

Thanks Ragib for a friendly welcoming message and also thanks for inviting me to your discussion page. I will just repeat once more what I already wrote on your talk-page: Talk.

• In my opinion, Wikipedia is definitely a great community of "spare-time contributors" to the general Common good.

best regards, Wayfarer | on July 2, 2005 | at 4:00 GMT

Apologies

Hi there! You'll probably have received an e-mail regarding a new password for your Wikipedia account... Well, it's been my fault. I'm user Wayfarer on the spanish Wikipedia, so when I tried to login here I tried the same username and password. After several attempts, I pressed the "Send me a new password" button thinking that I had forgotten the password... and a minute after that I noticed my mistake.

So if you haver received the Change Password Request mail, don't think that a hacker has been trying to steal your account... but just a forgetful spaniard! ;-)

Kind regards, -- Wayfarer.es 14:59, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of DNSKong

I've nominated DNSKong, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that DNSKong satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DNSKong and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of DNSKong during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Cornell Rockey 20:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

AfD and DNSKong

OK sorry Cornell Rockey, you know, I wasn't totally sure why it was deleted in the first place, so I just recreated the article in question. Thanks for explaining it to me!!

regards Wayfarer | on May 7, 2007

viruus

Regarding this edit, is the convention not to use a macron (virũs) rather than two u's in succesion? I wasn't sure, so I didn't change it. The spelling virũs does appear later in the article. — The Storm Surfer 22:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

TP Systems, Inc.

A tag has been placed on TP Systems, Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Alvestrand 20:26, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Well, this is a really very very delayed response, but I just noticed (or rather "re-noticed") this entry and I think I should clarify this once and for all (e.g. for other visitors that might read it):

I am actually not an author of that article (and not even a contributor)

... that is, not even a contributor in the most common meaning of the word "contributor", i.e. it's just a random article that I've stumbled upon back then and after creating my own Wikipedia account, I made my first ever edit (I don't remember anymore, but possibly it was just a minor grammar/spelling fix). --Wayfarer (talk) 23:59, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Slovenia

Hi there! You are welcome to join WikiProject Slovenia . We need as many Slovene members as possible!!

♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 21:53, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Intertranswiki/Slovenian

You are invited to join WikiProject Intertranswiki and join Wikipedia:WikiProject Intertranswiki/Slovenian. It is intended to be a joint group between Intertranswiki and WikiProject Slovenia of which you are already a part of The aim is to draw up a directory of missing articles from Slovenian wikipedia, extract what is notable or suitable, and build a team of translators to work at bridging the gaps in knowledge between other wikipedias. Even if you can't contribute much in starting content, your help is much needed to help draw up detailed lists of missing articles for Slovenia in the new project space and help other editors work through lists to build content more fully. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 10:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

DNSKong

Where do you have posted the "DNSKong" article of yours, before it got deleted?
Did it have an Infobox---http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:IBX?

-- #TTiT# ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ The-Traveller-in-Tacoma • 00:38, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Wayfarer. You have new messages at The-Traveller-in-Tacoma's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

---

Re: DNSKong

The article was posted here (the article name followed Wikipedia's naming conventions), while for others that might be interested I am also adding the related parts from the two e-mail messages that I've sent to/got replies from the DNSKong author.

1. An e-mail message titled "Re: Reply: [Aug16] question about Pyrenean.com" (the second one):

Robert Hill wrote:

> -1- Do you have your DNSKong-Wikipedia page posted somewhere I can preview it?

Well, the article/page about DNSKong on Wikipedia is as far as I know not accessible anymore (see: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/DNSKong), but luckily I saved the text to one file on my computer, and I attached this text (in DNSKong.txt file) to this e-mail.

2. An e-mail message titled "Re: [Aug16] question about Pyrenean.com" (the first one):

Robert Hill wrote:

> -1- Would you like to try again to get a page about DNSKong on Wikipedia?

Hello Robert, personally I won't try it again because actually I did recreate that article/page (about DNSKong program) on Wikipedia, however it was deleted again and then when I recreated it once again someone (if I recall correctly it was an admin, but rather see this section: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User_talk:Wayfarer#AfD_notification on my talk page) nominated it for deletion once more and explained to me why (i.e. the reason is that DNSKong is not a very well-know and widely-used program that would "require" its own page on Wikipedia).

--Wayfarer (talk) 20:15, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Sociology Newsletter: II (April 2010)

Sociology Project • News • April 2010
Spreading the meme since August 2006
The Sociology WikiProject is conducting a roll call (or min-census, if you prefer). More then five years down the road, we have over 50 members, but we don't know how many of them are still active in the sociology area. If you are or want to become once again an active contributor to the sociology content on Wikipedia, please move your name from the inactive to the active list on our roll call (or add yourself to the list if you haven't joined yet!). In other news, we have reactivated the newsletter :) At least, for this announcement. We also have a new, automated to do listing, an active tag and assess project (which has identified about 1,800 sociology articles on Wikipedia, and assessed about 1,3000 of them), and three new userboxes for your self-identification pleasure :) On a final note, I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Sociology page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions.
You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a recipient of WikiProject Sociology Newsletter (Opt-out). • signed

Wikification of dates

Hi, Wayfarer! The Manual of Style doesn't support wikification of dates in general: "Month-day articles (February 24 and 10 July) should not be linked unless their content is germane (i.e. “relevant and appropriate”) and topical to the subject. Such links should share an important connection with that subject other than that the events occurred on the same date. For example, editors should not link the date (or year) in a sentence such as (from Sydney Opera House): "The Sydney Opera House was made a UNESCO World Heritage Site on 28 June 2007", because little, if any, of the contents of either June 28 or 2007 are germane to either UNESCO, a World Heritage Site, or the Sydney Opera House." --Eleassar ^{my talk} 15:07, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Aha OK, thanks much Eleassar for letting me know about this. I really didn't know for the MOS:UNLINKDATES rule. Therefore I've reverted all the edits that I made lately back to their correct versions (namely, for instance Isaac Hlatshwayo, Viacheslav Senchenko, Rafał Jackiewicz etc. articles, see my Contributions for full list if you want to). --Wayfarer (talk) 18:56, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Have a nice day. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 22:11, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

JFK conspiracy

Hi - you are right about that lame sentence about the second brain, but the thing is, it was a direct quote from the source. So I gave it a lead-in and reinstated the quote as is. Still lame, but I think paraphrasing in that spot is not a good idea. Tvoz/talk 22:43, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

OK then, thank you for letting me know in the first place (i.e. and not just reverting it back); yeah, that's what I meant with "... please correct me if I'm wrong, but note the errors!" part of the Edit summary (i.e. that if it's a quote then it should be left as it is). .But in any case: is then one quotation mark (or are quotation marks) missing? See for yourself what I mean... --Wayfarer (talk) 23:37, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Right, I realized that was what you meant - again, the whole thing is lame, and I'm not completely convinced that the source is even really ok as RS, but for now I think it can stand. Would like to see better sourcing though. Cheers! Tvoz/talk 23:58, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Sociology membership

You are listed in the Category:Wikipedians interested in sociology, probably due to the use of "This user is interested in sociology" userbox, but you have not added yourself to our official member list for WikiProject Sociology. This prevents you from, among other things, receiving our sociology newsletter, as that member list acts as our newsletter mailing list (you can find the latest issue of our sociology newsletter here). If you'd like to receive the newsletter and help us figure out how many members we really have, please consider joining our WikiProject and adding yourself to our official member list. Thank you, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 13:24, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:18, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

nbsp

I'm not sure if you are aware, but placing a non-breaking space tag ( ) between a value and its units is normal for Wikipedia. You don't need to remove them. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#Unit symbols for further details. Regards, RJH (talk) 04:02, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! Yes, I must confess that I really didn't know that. --Wayfarer (talk) 19:18, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Certainly. There are a huge number of user boxes available. Most can be found under Wikipedia:Userboxes. Regards, RJH (talk) 01:23, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. When you recently edited Windows domain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:22, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Fixed! --Wayfarer (talk) 16:25, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Katarina Čas, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nova TV and The Guard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Done! --Wayfarer (talk) 14:06, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

New message from Gareth Griffith-Jones

Re- Talk:Ad hominem ... I have replied to you.

Cheers! Gareth Griffith-Jones/The Welsh Buzzard 09:03, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coprophagia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Storyline (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Corrected the link to point to Subplot! --Wayfarer (talk) 20:21, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gorazd Kocijančič may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• deuterocanonical books of [[Old Testament]] and the revision of the entire [[New Testament]]), and translated and annotated numerous patristic works such as ''Thoughts of the Greek Fathers on

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:58, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gorazd Kocijančič, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages French, Greek and German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gorazd Kocijančič, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Greek and Rector (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jan Zaveck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WBF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Wu-Tang Clan affiliates, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Love Letters and The Apple. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much Mdann52 for letting me know. I have already voted! – Wayfarer (talk) 01:57, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wayfarer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of reggae festivals, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Balboa and Galicia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

DS alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Electronic cigarette topic area, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

QuackGuru (talk) 02:17, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

E-cig page

That content was unsourced. That source is not a review. For medical claims we usually follow WP:MEDRS. The source says "While the e-cigarette companies say there is no tar or carbon monoxide in their products, just vapor, it’s important to note that the same addictive chemical found in e-cigarettes and cigarettes is nicotine, which causes addiction to smoking."[1] That does not appear to verify this edit. QuackGuru (talk) 02:17, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks much for info/feedback! 😊

Your welcome. Do you think the current content you added is verifiable? QuackGuru (talk) 21:02, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wayfarer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wayfarer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Note about account security

Hello Wayfarer - I'm not sure if you are aware of this, but Wikipedia recently had a spate of user account compromises. After investigation, it appeared that at least a significant issue involved in these compromises was that the Wikipedia editor had also used the same or similar password on a social media website that was posted on their userpage. Many major social media sites, including Myspace and Yahoo, have had major security breaches where user passwords were leaked.

I note that you have included links to external social media sites on your userpage. I'd suggest removing the links; however, if you choose not to do so, please ensure that you are using a unique password for your Wikipedia account that is not used on any of these other sites. Thanks very much. Risker (talk) 02:45, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Rejuvenate WikiProject Skepticism

Hello - my name is Susan Gerbic (Sgerbic) and I'm writing to you because at some point you joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism. This might have been months ago - or even years ago. With the best of intentions the project was created years ago, and sadly like many WikiProjects has started to go dormant. A group of us are attempting to revitalize the Skepticism project, already we have begun to clean up the main page and I've just redone the participant page. No one is in charge of this project, it is member directed, which might have been the reason it almost went dormant. We are attempting to bring back conversations on the talk page and have two subprojects as well, in the hopes that it might spark involvement and a way of getting to know each other better. One was created several years ago but is very well organized and a lot of progress was made, Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skeptical organisations in Europe. The other I created a couple weeks ago, it is very simple and has a silly name Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skepticism Stub Sub-Project Project (SSSPP). This sub-project runs from March 1 to June 1, 2022. We are attempting to rewrite skepticism stubs and add them to this list. As you can see we have already made progress.

The reason I'm writing to you now is because we would love to have you come back to the project and become involved, either by working on one of the sub-projects, proposing your own (and managing it), or just hanging out on the talk page getting to know the other editors and maybe donate some of your wisdom to some of the conversations. As I said, no one is in charge, so if you have something in mind you would like to see done, please suggest it on the talk page and hopefully others will agree. Please add the project to your watchlist, update your personal user page showing you are a proud member of WikiProject Skepticism. And DIVE in, this is what the work list looks like [2] frightening at first glance, but we have already started chipping away at it.

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Participants page has gone though a giant change - you may want to update your information. And of course if this project no longer interests you, please remove your name from the participant list, we would hate to see you go, but completely understand.

Thank you for your time, I hope to edit with you in the future.Sgerbic (talk) 07:37, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)