February 2021

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Also please see the Wikipedia:Three-revert rule.--agr (talk) 23:20, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

When across several articles your edits are being reverted by several different editors, you need to consider that there is indeed a problem with the content you are adding and that you should not be reverting their reversions. Please take heed of the good advice ArnoldReinhold gave above.Teishin (talk) 14:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring

edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Canterbury Tail talk 15:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Controversial topic area alert

edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. — Newslinger talk 17:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Newslinger talk 17:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quantum mysticism

edit

Please note that this is considered quantum mysticism as well as synthesis (WP:SYNTH) using WP:PRIMARY sources. Such beliefs and foreknowledge claims, when notable, can be mentioned in relevant articles, but they should be interpreted in the way independent reliable sources do... For instance, if other encyclopedias don't mention it (those are WP:TERTIARY and useful to determine what is important to cover), it's likely WP:UNDUE for Wikipedia. Moreover, we cannot present those like if they were facts in Wikipedia's voice. —PaleoNeonate21:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Without the geometry of light and logic of photon, observer-observability forms a paradox in modern science, truth-equilibrium finds no unification, and mind-light-matter unity is unreachable in spacetime. Subsequently, quantum mechanics has been shrouded with mysteries preventing itself from reaching definable causality for a general purpose analytical quantum computing paradigm. Ground-0 Axioms are introduced as an equilibrium-based, dynamic, bipolar set-theoretic unification of the first…[1] Such WP:PRIMARY papers are not really usable in Wikipedia articles. If you would like to pursue a discussion about the topic itself on Wikipedia, I recommend the Science Reference Desk but doubt that it would lead anywhere. The WP:FTN discussion was not fruitful and persistent WP:PROMOTION could eventually lead to sanctions (I posted here since editors of the noticeboard call to close the thread). I don't know if this applies, but if you are the author or know the author personally, per WP:COI users with a conflict of interest should clearly WP:DISCLOSE it and avoid editing about themselves, friends, company, etc. If there are other topics that you would like to edit about, I highly recommend it (and it would be an opportunity to demonstrate general interest in the encyclopedia). —PaleoNeonate14:06, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

References

How to sign talk page posts

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button   located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. —PaleoNeonate22:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)Reply