This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vampire Warrior (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am making this request through a secondary account I created to apologize for my actions and the fake suicide note I used to get away from a stalker. I have taken several months away from Wikipedia to cool down and I would like to come back to Wikipedia and make some worthwhile contributions. The suicide note was not a "prank" as claimed by Wknight94, it was a bad idea at the time and it was my only option to get away from the guy who was following me throughout many websites. This account is not a "sockpuppet" of ImmortalKaine. ImmortalKaine is my old old account. I forgot the password to ImmortalKaine and I don't remember the email I used to register it. I am requesting this unblock so I may once again be a helpful member of the community. I am not a bad person, I just made a few bad choices in my previous tenure on Wikipedia. If you choose to unblock me, allow me at least an hour to move my userpage from User:Vampire Warrior II to User: Vampire Warrior, after that, feel free to block this account.

Decline reason:

Unfortunately there would be multiple issues with considering to unblock you. The biggest being, the suicide threat you posted on your user page. Threats of harm are not to be thrown around lightly on Wikipedia and I doubt accounts blocked indefinitely for such threats are ever unblocked. The second issue is the obvious tension and ill feelings you harbor towards various people. I fear that you may easily fall whim to those tensions again. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 01:40, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm contacting the blocking admin. Sandstein (talk) 23:44, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
To any administrator reviewing this, take a look at his "helpful" attitude towards Wikipedia here. Metros (talk) 00:48, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
I was pushed too far. That is my response and I stick by it. People claim I have no "helpful" edits. I have and had plenty. I took time off of Wikipedia, as was suggested. I come back, to make an impact, to be a functional member of this website. I see plenty of people get second chances after making some mistakes. I made mistakes. We all make mistakes. I deserve a second chance just as much as anyone else. I do not appreciate the disrespect I see on this page. I have tried to make amends, but I have been ignored. I cannot help that people like our little friend above me ignores me. So it is written, so it shall come to pass. I'm sick and tired of having my talk page protected whenever I try to voice an opinion and try to talk man to man with some of your so called "administrators", and instead being treated with disrespect, having my talk page protected, usually with some smart mouth comment in the Edit summary, and then being treated like a dog. Vampire Warrior 01:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well I don't think anyone will want you around if you're flipping out because you're "pushed too far." Lots of crap happens around here and if you're just going to run around, calling people names and posting suicide threats when things aren't going the way you like it, I don't think you belong here. Metros (talk) 01:24, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
I do not harbour any ill feelings towards others. I do not see why I shouldn't be unblocked. I am a constant editor, here nearly every day and I revert alot of vandalism. I even created an article or two, and even some userboxes. I reiterate, I do not harbour any ill feelings or resentment towards anyone. You are all just doing your job. I've apologized many times for my actions. I was immature then, I have grown up. As for the suicide note, you must see it from my point. This guy was following me around from site to site, sending me threatening messages. I didn't know what to do. I didn't know I could have gone to the police. I did the only thing I could think of at the time, and it turned out to be the wrong choice. After the officer showed up, I went back here and created User:Vampire Warrior II, wrote up an apology, explaining everything and sent an apology message to several users. Would a bad person or a vandal think to do something like that? I think not. I didn't mean to cause any problems...I am sincere in my apology. I mean every word of it. I made bad choices, and I've seen plenty of people get second chances. Vampire Warrior 01:56, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • sigh*....I see Wknight94 doesn't real care for me very much. He also can't spell riddence. I'd like to get some unbiased comments on this from wiki admins who aren't Metros or Wknight94.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vampire Warrior (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please, read the latest comment by me. I am not a bad person, I just made a bad choice and did the wrong thing (the suicide note). I was stupid back then. I didn't know what else to do...

Decline reason:

No, given the lack of evidence that anything positive would come out of this. ~ Riana 04:02, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notification of automated file description generation

edit

Your upload of File:Blood Soaked.PNG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:CaptainBlacks.PNG

edit
 

The file File:CaptainBlacks.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 June 2019 (UTC)Reply