User talk:Twinkle1990/Archive 17
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Twinkle1990. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |
Draftifying articles that are at AfD
Hi, you should probably refrain from draftifying articles when they're the subject of an AfD, as you did here. It needlessly complicates things. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 05:07, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- I noticed that after draftifying. I have reverted. Twinkle1990 (talk) 05:09, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks both. I wish it had been eligible for draftification. Would have been a much cleaner solution. Star Mississippi 12:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- The draft should be deleted. I don't understand how a draft landed in AfD while it wasn't an article in real but by creator's mistake. Twinkle1990 (talk) 12:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- It was an article because the creator moved it on their own after it had already been draftified once. It wasn't a mistake per their note at AfD either. Star Mississippi 12:23, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Then it's obvious to be in AfD. Let me check if I find anything that can help to survive. Twinkle1990 (talk) 12:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Good luck! They're a commercial artist and I do not see any indication they're a notable one, unfortunately. Star Mississippi 12:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Found nothing in Google search, news search, book search. All references are vogue to the article. Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Good luck! They're a commercial artist and I do not see any indication they're a notable one, unfortunately. Star Mississippi 12:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Then it's obvious to be in AfD. Let me check if I find anything that can help to survive. Twinkle1990 (talk) 12:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- It was an article because the creator moved it on their own after it had already been draftified once. It wasn't a mistake per their note at AfD either. Star Mississippi 12:23, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- The draft should be deleted. I don't understand how a draft landed in AfD while it wasn't an article in real but by creator's mistake. Twinkle1990 (talk) 12:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks both. I wish it had been eligible for draftification. Would have been a much cleaner solution. Star Mississippi 12:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 180.200.221.5 (talk) 13:57, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Brian Slocum Article
Hello User:Twinkle1990, the Draft:Brian Slocum (law professor) article was not created in return for undisclosed payments. I am a writer based in Australia, I have no connection to the subject, least of all a financial one. Please explain your basis for putting that tag on the page. The language used on the page wasn't even promotional. Please remove the UDP tag from that page as I am concerned the effect that the tag will have on my reputation as an editor. Jack4576 (talk) 10:38, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Draft:Brian Slocum (law professor). @Jack4576 (talk · contribs) is a well-known established editor and one of our most prolific content creators on Australian law-related topics.- --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 16:48, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
