Too Orangey For Crows
Welcome
edit
|
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Too Orangey For Crows. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
re: Black Sabbath discography
editBlack Sabbath has never been signed to NEMS. NEMS is a South American label which licenced some Sabbath material for re-release in specific countries but they don't own the rights to any Sabbath material. Licenced re-releases and/or compliations are not regarded as "official" releases and are not to be included in Wikipedia discographies. You can initiate a discussion on the talk page if you'd like. SolarFlash (talk) 13:58, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Sorry to correct you, but you seem to be talking about a completely different label: https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/NEMS_Enterprises_(label) This was founded in 1987, so clearly not the same label that released the Sabbath compilation in 1977!
Here is a link to info on the older NEMS label -- which was English, not South American, and appears to have no connection other than having the same name: https://rateyourmusic.com/label/nems/
It states pretty clearly on that page that the older NEMS label was owned by Hemdale Group, who actually managed Sabbath at the time. So surely that qualifies the Greatest Hits as a legitimate release? Too Orangey For Crows (talk) 14:26, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Like I said, you can try to gain a consensus on the talk page. But no way is this an official release. SolarFlash (talk) 01:33, 9 April 2019 (UTC)