Tommyboynr1

Blocked

You have a history of disruptive editing. You knew and acknowledged that edits like this were inappropriate. You then deliberately made these disruptive edits, knowing they were inappropriate: [1], [2], [3]. Given your history of disruptive edits stretching back almost five years, I have blocked you indefinitely. Any admin is free to lift the block if they are convinced you understand why your edits were disruptive and are convinced you'll never again make another disruptive edit. --Yamla (talk) 11:16, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tommyboynr1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Request to unblock, I will never again make such disruptive edits. Tommyboynr1 (talk) 07:23, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You will need to specifically explain how your edits were disruptive, to ensure understanding, and specifically tell what types of constructive contributions you want to make. Until you do that, you can't be unblocked. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 07:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How exactly were your edits disruptive, and what constructive contributions do you want to make in the future? 331dot (talk) 07:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

I will contribute constructively to Wikipedia and follow all admins guidelines. --Tommyboynr1 (talk) 07:54, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

You can see on my contributions cited by Admin Yamla how disruptive they were. I wont do that anymore. I will do the best that I can do contribute positively to Wikipedia guidelines. --Tommyboynr1 (talk) 08:07, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I see them, and I know how they were disruptive, but I(or any admin) will need you to tell us how exactly they were disruptive, so we know that you understand why. I would also need to know what contributions you want to make, such as what articles or topic areas you want to edit in or otherwise tell what exactly you want to do. That also helps us know that you understand what you did wrong. Many people tell us that they understand what they did and then go on to show that they actually did not understand and were just telling us what we wanted to hear to get unblocked. 331dot (talk) 08:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

I understand what I did wrong. I ignored the rules of Wikipedia policy. I will make contribution on news topics and mobile phones articles. --Tommyboynr1 (talk) 08:14, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

What rule or rules did you ignore? Please give your answer in another unblock request, which will be reviewed by someone else. 331dot (talk) 08:15, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tommyboynr1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did not discuss the edits with other wiki users, I will not do so in the future Tommyboynr1 (talk) 08:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This unfortunately shows that you do not understand why your edits were disruptive. It would thus be highly likely that you would repeat such problematic edits if you were unblocked. Huon (talk) 22:13, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Attempted block evasion

This user attempted to evade their block as 192.164.83.2 in March, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 11:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tommyboynr1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand what I did wrong and I will not do so in the future, you will see it if you unblock me Tommyboynr1 (talk) 06:06, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. MER-C 17:48, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tommyboynr1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand all charges against me , please give me a chance and unblock, i wont violate wikipedia entries, I will make positive contributions. --Tommyboynr1 (talk) 10:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 14:07, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you are repeatedly unwilling to address the reasons for your block, I have revoked talk page access. Another admin will be along eventually to review your meaningless unblock request above. --Yamla (talk) 11:26, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

As you no longer have access to your talk page, your only avenue to unblocking is via WP:UTRS. --Yamla (talk) 14:07, 18 May 2019 (UTC)