Tikitorch2

Welcome!

Hi Tikitorch2! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Bon courage (talk) 04:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to COVID-19, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Bon courage (talk) 04:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Martin Kulldorff. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Slow motion edit-warring is still edit warring. Bon courage (talk) 05:27, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

The edit war was instigated by Geogsage and Newimperial going forward with an edit without achieving consensus on the controversial portion. Although it may have appeared I made the first edit, this was not the case as they sought to end a talk page discussion without consensus and I simply attempted to minimize the harm done by their “consensus” by removing the most limited portion of their edit I could. There wasn’t really a good way to keep the portion I removed without redundancy if it were properly attributed to its source. You will note that similar text existed before their edit and I refrained from removal while good faith discussion on the talk page was still ongoing.

I find threats of a block from you ironic because of your own one-sided opinion on the same talk pages prior to this “edit war” and your pattern of reverting to reintroduce false allegations on this and similar contentious articles (see my edit on Gupta’s page) Tikitorch2 (talk) 02:54, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

December 2024

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 05:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Martin Kulldorff, you may be blocked from editing. Ixocactus (talk) 00:23, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Can you take the high road and remove the "falsely" from the article while the talk page discussion is pending? I know you have previous edit history on the page.

The "falsely" is an untrue (or contentious at best) allegation against Dr. Kulldorff on his BLP page and reads as Wikipedia attacking Kulldorff instead of being properly cited to the source (Howard). This has been brought up before but the CDC has updated their statements and data on the subject so now there is a high quality source on the subject. Tikitorch2 (talk) 02:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)