Thewinrat

Welcome!

Hello, Thewinrat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GermanJoe (talk) 19:07, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Thewinrat! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 00:17, Saturday, March 24, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

star

Well, thanks for the star Hmains (talk) 01:44, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Your welcome, fellow autopatroller! Thewinrat (talk) 01:48, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

What are you doing?

Although I obviously strongly disagree witht he IP users’ lack of civility towards others, they were not entirely wrong. You seem to be making a lot of weird moves, including creating blank talk and user pages for IPs, claiming other users are “open to trout slapping” and making bad reverts. None of that looks like it is helping the encyclopedia, instead it looks like you are just screwing around, and in some cases being disruptive. Maybe review WP:5 and rethink what it is you hope to accomplish here. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:48, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

ma bad. i will stop and keep those comments. Thewinrat (talk) 15:50, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Something to keep in mind

Hello, the wikitrout is for editors who've made a silly and ideally funny mistake that does not severely affect the encyclopedia, not for serious mistakes and malicious activity. Please read the guidelines for trouting before you do it again, as excessive and inappropriate trouting may lead other editors to believe that you are not taking this seriously. Thanks. Zyc1174 _chat? ^{what I did} 03:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: how much i did was wrong

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: I still think the information about the timing of the Husker Du version of Eight Miles High is superfluous and not notable. It bloats the section. 218.102.199.73 (talk) 21:48, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Your help desk question

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:34, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Huggle

Question: you say you use Huggle. How are you able to run Huggle without having rollback righths? I cannot even launch it without having rollback rights. Thanks in advance! SaltySaltyTears (talk) 22:33, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Good question! well, what i do is that i go to huggle, when it says that i can not use the app when i do not have them, and it says that i can use the app in guest mode. so i click yes, then when

i found any type of vandalism, i go to that link that was vandalised, then revert it! kudos, Thewinrat (OS of this day: Ubuntu 4.10 (Warty Warhog) (talk) 00:46, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Thewinrat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2018).

Administrator changes

Al Ameer son • Randykitty • Spartaz

Boson • Daniel J. Leivick • Efe • Esanchez7587 • Fred Bauder • Garzo • Martijn Hoekstra • Orangemike

Interface administrator changes

Deryck Chan

Guideline and policy news

• Following a request for comment, the Mediation Committee is now closed and will no longer be accepting case requests.
• A request for comment is in progress to determine whether members of the Bot Approvals Group should satisfy activity requirements in order to remain in that role.
• A request for comment is in progress regarding whether to change the administrator inactivity policy, such that administrators "who have made no logged administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped". Currently, the policy states that administrators "who have made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped".
• A proposal has been made to temporarily restrict editing of the Main Page to interface administrators in order to mitigate the impact of compromised accounts.

Technical news

• Administrators and bureaucrats can no longer unblock themselves unless they placed the block initially. This change has been implemented globally. See also this ongoing village pump discussion (permalink).
• To complement the aforementioned change, blocked administrators will soon have the ability to block the administrator that placed their block to mitigate the possibility of a compromised administrator account blocking all other active administrators.
• Since deployment of Partial blocks on Test Wikipedia, several bugs were identified. Most of them are now fixed. Administrators are encouraged to test the new deployment and report new bugs on Phabricator or leave feedback on the Project's talk page. You can request administrator access on the Test Wiki here.

Arbitration

• Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 3 December 2018. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.

Miscellaneous

• In late November, an attacker compromised multiple accounts, including at least four administrator accounts, and used them to vandalize Wikipedia. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. Sharing the same password across multiple websites makes your account vulnerable, especially if your password was used on a website that suffered a data breach. As these incidents have shown, these concerns are not pure fantasies.
• Wikipedia policy requires administrators to have strong passwords. To further reinforce security, administrators should also consider enabling two-factor authentication. A committed identity can be used to verify that you are the true account owner in the event that your account is compromised and/or you are unable to log in.

Obituaries

• Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (Raymond Arritt) passed away on 14 November 2018. Boris joined Wikipedia as Raymond arritt on 8 May 2006 and was an administrator from 30 July 2007 to 2 June 2008.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, and congrats!

Congratulations! You are the first user to use my "just dosen't get it" userbox!
Thanks, CrazyMinecart88 16:50, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Thewinrat! You created a thread called Redirect question at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Smile

Hello Thewinrat, CrazyMinecart88 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks, CrazyMinecart88 (talk | contribs) 22:20, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).

Administrator changes

Galobtter

Orangemike

BorgQueen • Davidruben • Ocee • Revolving Bugbear • Theda • There'sNoTime • Timc • Tijuana Brass • Tristessa de St Ange

Bureaucrat changes

Addshore

CheckUser changes

Joe Roe • SilkTork

Euryalus • Newyorkbrad • There'sNoTime

Oversight changes

AGK • Joe Roe • SilkTork

Euryalus • Newyorkbrad • There'sNoTime

Guideline and policy news

• There are a number of new or changed speedy deletion criteria, each previously part of WP:CSD#G6:

1. G14 (new): Disambiguation pages that disambiguate only zero or one existing pages are now covered under the new G14 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-disambig}}; the text is unchanged and candidates may be found in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unnecessary disambiguation pages.
2. R4 (new): Redirects in the file namespace (and no file links) that have the same name as a file or redirect at Commons are now covered under the new R4 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-redircom}}; the text is unchanged.
3. G13 (expanded): Userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text are now covered under G13 along with other drafts (discussion). Such blank drafts are now eligible after six months rather than one year, and taggers continue to use {{db-blankdraft}}.

• The Wikimedia Foundation now requires all interface administrators to enable two-factor authentication.
• Members of the Bot Approvals Group (BAG) are now subject to an activity requirement. After two years without any bot-related activity (e.g. operating a bot, posting on a bot-related talk page), BAG members will be retired from BAG following a one-week notice.

Technical news

• Starting on December 13, the Wikimedia Foundation security team implemented new password policy and requirements. Privileged accounts (administrators, bureaucrats, checkusers, oversighters, interface administrators, bots, edit filter managers/helpers, template editors, et al.) must have a password at least 10 characters in length. All accounts must have a password:

1. At least 8 characters in length
2. Not in the 100,000 most popular passwords (defined by the Password Blacklist library)
3. Different from their username

User accounts not meeting these requirements will be prompted to update their password accordingly. More information is available on MediaWiki.org.

• Blocked administrators may now block the administrator that blocked them. This was done to mitigate the possibility that a compromised administrator account would block all other active administrators, complementing the removal of the ability to unblock oneself outside of self-imposed blocks. A request for comment is currently in progress to determine whether the blocking policy should be updated regarding this change.
• {{Copyvio-revdel}} now has a link to open the history with the RevDel checkboxes already filled in.

Arbitration

• Following the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: AGK, Courcelles, GorillaWarfare, Joe Roe, Mkdw, SilkTork.

Miscellaneous

• Accounts continue to be compromised on a regular basis. Evidence shows this is entirely due to the accounts having the same password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately.
• Around 22% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 20% in June 2018. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless of whether you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:39, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Fan cheng cheng

WP:G5 only applies where the user was blocked before tha article was created. In practice this means that the user has been blocked and come back as a sockpuppet. That's not the case for Fan cheng cheng. WP:A7 would likely be rejected as he is listed in Idol Producer (season 1). I think your original tag of BLPPROD is the most likely to succeed. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 20:12, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

@Discospinster: as they deleted it anyway. I believe Cabayi is correct, unless there's something not in the block log indicating that this user was a sock from the getgo. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:04, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Thewinrat! You created a thread called About contesting a speedy deletion... at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Thewinrat! You created a thread called Question about WP:AIV at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Edits

Hello, i think you are WP:Bite on the newly created articles in the new pages log. You are merely adding tags to articles within a minute of them being created. Some editors may still be improving their articles and your tags may discourage them. Give them a few minutes before adding tags Loved150 (talk) 17:34, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

And you are still at it - this speedy deletion tag was added just three minutes after article creation. Please give editors time to add context before calling for speedy deletion based on your perceived (but in this case incorrect) lack of context. Your actions prevent this encyclopedia from being built, rather than help that process. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:26, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Don’t

Don’t copy anything from other webs until you read this http://en.m.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Copying_from_other_websites Wwepro126 (talk) 20:28, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

I have not even copied anything from any source and, in fact, has not even created a article before. Besides, i don't even know how to cite citations. I can't find citations, and can't find which one is wrong, or which one is right. All i know about them is that they prove something on the article. --TheWinRat (talk) 17:28, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

TheWinRat, if you haven't yet learnt the fundamentals of Wikipedia, such as how to cite sources, then I would suggest that you refrain from marking other people's work by doing things such as deletion tagging. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:46, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Thewinrat! You created a thread called Special:Random at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Thewinrat! You created a thread called 2 questions at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2019).

Administrator changes

Enterprisey • JJMC89

BorgQueen

Harro5 • Jenks24 • Graft • R. Baley

Interface administrator changes

Enterprisey

Guideline and policy news

• A request for comment is currently open to reevaluate the activity requirements for administrators.
• Administrators who are blocked have the technical ability to block the administrator who blocked their own account. A recent request for comment has amended the blocking policy to clarify that this ability should only be used in exceptional circumstances, such as account compromises, where there is a clear and immediate need.
• A request for comment closed with a consensus in favor of deprecating The Sun as a permissible reference, and creating an edit filter to warn users who attempt to cite it.

Technical news

• A discussion regarding an overhaul of the format and appearance of Wikipedia:Requests for page protection is in progress (permalink). The proposed changes will make it easier to create requests for those who are not using Twinkle. The workflow for administrators at this venue will largely be unchanged. Additionally, there are plans to archive requests similar to how it is done at WP:PERM, where historical records are kept so that prior requests can more easily be searched for.

Miscellaneous

• Voting in the 2019 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2019, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2019, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
• A new IRC bot is available that allows you to subscribe to notifications when specific filters are tripped. This requires that your IRC handle be identified.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Competence is required

Hello, Thewinrat. Your question at the Teahouse about reporting editors for sockpuppetry has been answered by Cabayi and myself (see here). I am really confused by your actions; they don't seem very reasonable to me. Perhaps I'm missing something blindingly obvious, so can you explain, please? You can do that either here or at the Teahouse - it's up to you. Two minutes after your Teahouse post, you reported two different new users at WP:SPI (see here). Each editor had only one ever made one or two edits each, and each created new drafts (Draft:Himachal Abhi Abhi and Draft:Mahalaxmi municipile) They were created half an hour apart and both in Hindi. As I believe there are more than two Hindi-speakers in the world, is it not unreasonable for two such editors to simply coincide and make the mistake of posting a non-English article at roughly the same time? I fail to see why, at this time, you would conclude they were related as sockpuppets? The article contents seem totally unrelated, so I can't see how you'd conclude sockpuppetry just from seeing two consecutive entries on the Page Curation report, which was your rationale to SPI. To me, your Teahouse question, and then two minutes later at SPI, just wastes volunteer time and suggests a serious lack of understanding by you of how parts of Wikipedia works. Before reporting and accusing editors, you should acquire far more evidence of your suspicions yourself first - especially that which shows similar activity patterns before accusing brand new editors of sockpuppetry. You'll have seen that we have an editor interaction tool to compare the activities of two or more editors, and perhaps you should read the instructions at WP:SPI and look at older SPI reports to see how others have gathered their suspicions together and how they have reported them.

How do you think an immediate SPI notice on their userpages is going to make people feel welcome as new editors here? Because I have looked at your talkpage and have seen others editors expressing concerns about your lack of understanding in certain areas of Wikipedia, I am pasting this copy of my reply directly on your talk page, and advise you to step back before reporting more editors in this way. Please stick to less contentious area of editing and do read: Wikipedia:Competence is required. Nick Moyes (talk) 19:13, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Thewinrat! You created a thread called Question at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Thewinrat! You created a thread called Sockpuppet Question at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Thewinrat. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 17:32, 11 February 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

I found NFL players article

• Draft:Keith Radecic
• Draft:Dan Morgan (offensive lineman)
• Draft:Jesse James (center) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A000:140D:4316:A97E:32DB:770A:DB0D (talk) 16:42, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

What about the drafts? What can i do to help them? Why did you send me these drafts? Please tell me. --TheWinRat (talk) 16:45, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Make into a article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A000:140D:4316:A97E:32DB:770A:DB0D (talk) 16:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, but i dont have reviewer rights. I might get them when i have 500 edits on mainspace, but for now, i can't. --TheWinRat (talk) 16:51, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

BLP Sources

Mind explaining why you added a blp sources notice to an article where every line has a clear source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shofet tsaddiq (talk • contribs) 20:30, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Because it will need more sources to prove it does exist, and its actions actually happened. 3 sources might not be enough sources for a Wikipedia article. --TheWinRatHere! 16:26, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

I added a source for her date of death. Adding this notice was not a good decision. Shofet tsaddiq (talk) 16:50, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Well hey, you can now remove the BLP Notice. --TheWinRatHere! 16:52, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

(after edit conflict) Thewinrat, your reply here shows why you should follow the advice that I gave earlier and stop passing judgement on other people's contributions until you have learnt the basics of Wikipedia yourself. The tag that you added said that there were statements in the article that were uncited, but this simply wasn't true. And I don't know how you managed to come to the conclusion that it hadn't been proven that she (not "it") did not exist, because the sources clearly show that. It's not a matter of the number of sources, but whether the content in the article was verified.

I would also point out that this edit was simply ridiculous, and I'm not surprised that the article creator thought that it was done by some automated process, because it seems pretty incredible that a human editor would conclude that that was a copyright violation.

I know that you mean well, but it would be much better if you concentrated on improving articles until you have learnt more about Wikipedia, rather than asking for advanced permissions and telling good editors that they are doing something wrong when they are not. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Well, you are right. I should check if it were to be free or not to be free. You see, every time i see the copyvio issue in the page curration, and it is past 79 persent, i would just delete the article. I must stop that. I will stop that. I will only delete articles that has non free content. Im just gonna stop talking... --TheWinRatHere! 17:09, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Thewinrat! You created a thread called Can anyone help? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Your signature

Hello, Thewinrat. The black background on your signature makes it difficult to read. Do you think you could remove the black background? Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 22:37, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

@Mz7:  Done --TheWinRatHere! 16:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! Mz7 (talk) 22:45, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Mz7 (talk) 22:47, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Originally, I had granted this right indefinitely. However, after a closer review of your contributions, it appears that you have a recent history of biting newcomers: see User talk:Thewinrat#Competence is required and User talk:Thewinrat#BLP Sources. As I believe that pending changes reviewer is one of the most lightweight and easily obtainable permissions any editor can receive, I won't revoke the right, but I am going to restrict it to a trial period of one month. After one month with the permission, if you wish to continue using the right, you may contact me or file a new request at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer to extend the duration of the right. If you have any questions, feel free to let me know. All the best, Mz7 (talk) 23:00, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion criteria

Hello, Thewinrat,

I saw that you tagged User:Epic game fixer page under CSD G5 criteria which is a tag for deleting pages created by a blocked editor. However, this criteria doesn't apply to pages created BEFORE an editor is blocked or AFTER a block is lifted. So, basically, this criteria applies to pages created by sockpuppets of a blocked editor. In this case, the editor created their user page before they were blocked so the criteria doesn't apply.

I see that you have received some criticism on your talk page as you pick up the many, complicated rules of editing Wikipedia. I would like to applaud you for your work welcoming new editors to Wikipedia. Even after years of editing and becoming an admin, I still usually spend some time each day welcoming new editors to the project. Because experienced editors can retire or drift away from active editing after years of work, Wikipedia relies on an influx of new editors each year and I think it makes a big difference when they receive a welcoming message on their talk page pointing out where they can go to learn about editing. It's impossible to tell which new editor will become the next active contributor so we might as welcome those who are just starting out! 20:39, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Just changed another that you tagged G1 (nonsense) which doesn't apply to foreign language articles, to A2 te:దక్షిణ తీరం రైల్వే జోన్. Cabayi (talk) 16:46, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Please don't...

...do stuff like this. Drmies (talk) 17:30, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

• From the editors: Help wanted (still)

• News and notes: Front-page issues for the community

• In focus: Wikimedia affiliate organizations seek community participation in 2019 board election

• Discussion report: Talking about talk pages

• Featured content: Conquest, War, Famine, Death, and more!

• Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbitration Committee

• Traffic report: Binge-watching

• Technology report: Tool labs casters-up

• Gallery: Signed with pride

• Recent research: Research finds signs of cultural diversity and recreational habits of readers

• Essay: Optimist's guide to Wikipedia

• From the archives: New group aims to promote Wiki-Love

• Humour: Pesky Pronouns

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2019).

Administrator changes

Evad37

There'sNoTime

Alex Shih • Brian • Mushroom • Nakon • Oscarthecat • PeruvianLlama • Ragib • Reaper Eternal • Rossami • Tom

Interface administrator changes

Evad37 • Galobtter

Ritchie333

CheckUser changes

There'sNoTime

Keegan • Ks0stm

Oversight changes

There'sNoTime

Ks0stm • Sphilbrick

Guideline and policy news

• The RfC on administrator activity requirements failed to reach consensus for any proposal.
• Following discussions at the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and Wikipedia talk:Administrators, an earlier change to the restoration of adminship policy was reverted. If requested, bureaucrats will not restore administrator permissions removed due to inactivity if there have been five years without a logged administrator action; this "five year rule" does not apply to permissions removed voluntarily.

Technical news

• A new tool is available to help determine if a given IP is an open proxy/VPN/webhost/compromised host.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee announced two new OTRS queues. Both are meant solely for cases involving private information; other cases will continue to be handled at the appropriate venues (e.g., WP:COIN or WP:SPI).
  • paid-en-wpwikipedia.org has been set up to receive private evidence related to abusive paid editing.
  • checkuser-en-wpwikipedia.org has been set up to receive private requests for CheckUser. For instance, requests for IP block exemption for anonymous proxy editing should now be sent to this address instead of the functionaries-en list.

Miscellaneous

• Following the 2019 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Base, Einsbor, Jon Kolbert, Schniggendiller, and Wim b.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Puck Puppet Theatre

G5? DlohCierekim 16:42, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

 Deleted G5 --TheWinRatHere! 16:43, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks

As you might have guessed I am new to Wikipedia, so whatever shortfall left in my editing is because of lack of experience or something like that. Thanks for pointing out the mistakes and the suggestions you provided. I expect to be guided and to be cooperated with. Ankur Jyoti Dewri (talk) 17:53, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Still Aware

I did not make this with the intent of it being an advertisement of the organization. What should I need to change for it to not appear so "promotional"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by *Treker (talk • contribs)

 Deleted SD Notice --TheWinRatHere! 16:59, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! That's very nice of you.★Trekker (talk) 17:07, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

You're welcome! --TheWinRatHere! 17:10, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Thewinrat! You created a thread called Sockpuppet question at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Exotic pet pending changes

I see that you accepted an unexplained pending change that added whales to a list of examples of Exotic pets (and included other questionable changes). This list is a matter of ongoing dispute and it is the reason pending changes are enabled for that article. The issue is discussed on the Talk page. At least one IP has been blocked. I suggest to please try to pay more attention to what you are accepting. —BarrelProof (talk) 03:50, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Orz... I did not know that a simple me accidentally accepting a vandal may cause a problem like this. I'd say, i would RPP the page to be semi-protected. --TheWinRatHere! 16:15, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

OK, thanks for responding. I will do that. —BarrelProof (talk) 16:58, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Thewinrat! You created a thread called Templates meaning at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Apple Inc.

Hello Thewinrat,

You've been identified either as a previous member of the project, an active editor on Apple related pages, a bearer of Apple related userboxes, or just a hoopy frood.

WikiProject Apple Inc. has unexpectedly quit, because an error type "unknown" occured. Editors must restart it! If you are interested, read the project page and sign up as a member. There's something for everyone to do, such as welcoming, sourcing, writing, copy editing, gnoming, proofreading, or feedback — but no pressure. Do what you do, but let's coordinate and stay in touch.

See the full welcome message on the talk page, or join the new IRC channel on irc.freenode.net named #wikipedia-en-appleinc ^connect. Please join, speak, and idle, and someone will read and reply.

Please spread the word, and join or unsubscribe at the subscription page.

RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} and Smuckola on behalf of WikiProject Apple Inc. - Delivered 15:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Thewinrat. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention.
Message added 18:18, 27 March 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:18, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Nice welcome

While it was very nice of you to welcome Isidorakovacevic in Russian, it would have been nicer to welcome her in Serbian, the language in which she has contributed. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:52, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

• From the editors: Getting serious about humor
• News and notes: Blackouts fail to stop EU Copyright Directive
• In the media: Women's history month
• Discussion report: Portal debates continue, Prespa agreement aftermath, WMF seeks a rebranding
• Featured content: Out of this world
• Arbitration report: The Tides of March at ARBCOM
• Traffic report: Exultations and tribulations
• Technology report: New section suggestions and sitewide styles
• News from the WMF: The WMF's take on the new EU Copyright Directive
• Recent research: Barnstar-like awards increase new editor retention
• From the archives: Esperanza organization disbanded after deletion discussion
• Humour: The Epistolary of Arthur 37
• Op-Ed: Pro and Con: Has gun violence been improperly excluded from gun articles?
• In focus: The Wikipedia SourceWatch
• Special report: Wiki Loves (50 Years of) Pride
• Community view: Wikipedia's response to the New Zealand mosque shootings

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 15:42, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Anarchyte (talk | work) 11:02, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).

Administrator changes

Reaper Eternal • ThaddeusB

Bogdangiusca • Christopher Parham • Necrothesp • Schneelocke • Siroxo • Sarah

Mentifisto → Lofty abyss

Interface administrator changes

Mr. Stradivarius

Bureaucrat changes

DeltaQuad

Kingturtle

Technical news

• In Special:Preferences under "Appearance" → "Advanced options", there is now an option to show a confirmation prompt when clicking on a rollback link.
• The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Please see meta:Community health initiative/User reporting system consultation 2019 to provide your input on this idea.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee clarified that the General 1RR prohibition for Palestine-Israel articles may only be enforced on pages with the {{ARBPIA 1RR editnotice}} edit notice.

Miscellaneous

• Two more administrator accounts were compromised. Evidence has shown that these attacks, like previous incidents, were due to reusing a password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. All admins are strongly encouraged to enable two-factor authentication, please consider doing so. Please always practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
• As a reminder, according to WP:NOQUORUM, administrators looking to close or relist an AfD should evaluate a nomination that has received few or no comments as if it were a proposed deletion (PROD) prior to determining whether it should be relisted.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:57, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Tagging and other things

Adding tags like this to drafts is not helpful, particularly as most of these were created within hours of you tag bombing them in user or draft space. Additionally this is also not helpful and not even remotely true, this is on a draft that isn't even submitted, same here and I can keep going - stop adding irrelevant tags meant for mainspace on drafts which are clearly works in progress, it's bordering on disruptive. Praxidicae (talk) 17:09, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Thewinrat Can you please respond to this? We generally do not add tags to draft articles (tags like these, anyway) as I've mentioned above, but you've continued to do so. And why are you adding tags to blocked users? If an admin has chosen not to, you definitely shouldn't be doing so. Praxidicae (talk) 17:50, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

And I'll also note that this is disruptive because it's confusing to new users submitting drafts when they're being given other templates and directions by experienced reviewers only to have their draft tag bombed with maintenance notifications meant for mainspace. Praxidicae (talk) 18:00, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, the cluelessness here, after so many have reached out with advice, is more than enough to go ahead and block. I didn't want it to come to this but it seems like the only solution at this point. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:09, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

your rollback request, and...everything else you are doing

You may notice my name popping up a lot in response to recent edits of yours. This is because I reviewed your bizarre request for rollback permissions and it prompted me to look deeper into your recent contributions. I do not belive you have sufficient maturity and/or English comprehension to be patrolling and evaluating the actions of other users. While you are not always in the wrong, there is an unacceptably high rate of error in your actions. You've been a fairly active user for seven months now, but I'm seeing the type of errors we usually see in brand-new users. In the last twenty minutes I've closed an SPI you filed as not needed, removed a category that is explicitly not meant to be used directly in articles, removed a {{tense}} tag that seemed misapplied, and observed numerous other errors that were already corrected by others, including a nonsensical report to UAA. And I haven't even made it through your last 100 contributions.

You mentioned being blocked in your rollback request, and at the time I thought that was just odd because I couldn't see blocking someone for posting a rollback request that was denied, but now I'm starting to think it might not be such a bad idea. I believe you are here in good faith and honestly trying to help, but you just don't seem to "get it".

I never enjoy saying this to anyone, but for whatever reason, it seems like editing Wikiepdia may not be the best activity for you. I'm just guessing here but I get the impression you are probably a young person, and maybe English isn't your first language. Being young is great. I wish I'd enjoyed it more. And learning a new language is awesome. If I'm right about that you're already way more proficient in English than I ever was when I studied German, but your comprehension level, both of the written word and of Wikipedia's policies, seems severly lacking. I really think you should consider the possibility that at this time this may not be something you're particularly good at. This is not to say you never will be, but the rate of errors you are making is creating work for others, often needlessly, and there's alrady way more real work to be done than can be kept up with.

Again, I'm sorry for being so blunt but I feel strongly it needed to be said. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:46, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the information, well, yes. I actually don't get it. I am a young person here in the Wikipedia (My age here is...finally state my real age. Don't judge.). I don't want to go political, but this is a certain Orz... situation i'm in right now. My eyes popped out when i got blocked for trying to bribe a Wikilove, and despite warnings. Well, basically in a nutshell, its like i'm a person breaking the rules in front of a drill Sargent every time i edit here. Yup, that's it. Everything else i would say would be too political, and i'm not that type of person. Thanks. (P.S. I don't get any sort of barn-stars, well, i got a smile, but that's all i got. (Also, i'm not begging for one, but one barn-star would be fine for me.) (Also also, I'm thinking about quiting this site, or be semi-active, but i don't think i would quit this site.) (Also also also, I have a big fear of getting banned. You know that one time when i was blocked, then spammed i'm sorry all over my talk page, that's a sign. i know its not that important, but its some thing i would like putting out here.) Anyways, kudos.) yup, i'm probably gonna be blocked again. --TheWinRatHere! 15:38, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Maybe take a break from editing for a year or two. That way you wouldn't be blocked, you wouldn't have to worry about making mistakes, and you would also always know that you could come back to editing at some later time and it would probably be easier at that later time. MPS1992 (talk) 17:35, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

@MPS1992: I might be able to do that, i will think about taking a wikibreak from 1 year, or, at least 11 months or something. Thanks for reminding me. --TheWinRatHere! 15:25, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Your recent revert on Valentina Matviyenko

Hi, thanks for your recent revert of BLP-violating vandalism on Valentina Matviyenko. However, I thought you should know that by translating the Russian edit summary into English in your edit summary, you have introduced your own BLP violation in your edit summary. I have requested that this be reversion deleted (along with the original Russian edit), but thought I should let you know in case you notice it in your contributions history. Thanks, Gricehead (talk) 11:03, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for not seeming to be willing and/or able to understand Wikipedia policies and not willing/able to coherently communicate in English.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Beeblebrox (talk) 17:55, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Oh dang. I did not have expected a block here. Well, fun times. Cheers. --TheWinRatHere! 20:05, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

That is not correct, you already said above i'm probably gonna be blocked again. My recommendation would be to create an entirely new account in about two years. And not to avoid the block on this account, because that will cause further problems and will also be obvious. Goodbye and good luck. MPS1992 (talk) 02:03, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Good luck to you too. Guess see you in 2021, maybe. --TheWinRatHere! 15:20, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

To be absolutely clear, MPS1992 is giving you horrible advice: that is a violation of the policy on the use of multiple accounts and we will block any new account you create while this account remains blocked for block evasion. If you wish to edit again, your only option is to follow the instructions above and appeal from this account. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:21, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

 Note: I would suggest that this user go to the Simple English Wikipedia or Vikidia, as those wikis use simple English, and Vikidia is designed for children. Rob3512 _chat? ^{what I did} 17:48, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I would agree with Rob3512, contribute to other projects (on this account), and then we will be much more likely to unblock you if you ever appeal. I'd also encourage you to not add too much information about yourself on the internet. I've had to remove some of it from your userpage for your safety. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:05, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

@TonyBallioni: Sure, i would like to contribute on other projects. Whats the most recommended project i should contribute on? --TheWinRatHere! 15:25, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Made 2 accounts

I have made 2 accounts on both Simple Wikipedia and Vikidia. The Vikidia account is right here and the simple english account is right here. Wish me luck. --TheWinRatHere! 15:54, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

The Vikidia account is about to get blocked as a Onestrike. Simple English will get warned as well. See ya. Dane|Geld 21:54, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

DaneGeld, this is uncalled for. Those are both independent of the English Wikipedia, and have their own policies and communities. – bradv🍁 22:47, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

DaneGeld that's not how onestrike works... Vermont (talk) 22:53, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

DaneGeld I advised Thewinrat to join those wikis because they are more suitable for him at his age. He isn't being purposefully disruptive here, so the onestrike policy on Simple Wiki doesn't apply, and there's no such policy _(AFAIK) on Vikidia. Rob3512 _chat? ^{what I did} 00:48, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Let em just add here as the blocking admin that I agree that making constructive changes on another wiki is exactly the sort of thing that could help make an unblock appeal at some later date succeed, and it seems cruel and in bad faith to go after these accounts solely because of problems here. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:31, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Well apparently my colleagues disagree with my decision to block him anyway, so whatever. His account is unblocked. I have nothing more to do with the matter. I disagree though with your sending people that you block here, elsewhere. This is why we now have JaySmith on Vikidia, pestering the hell out of us. Dane|Geld 07:20, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

(after edit conflict) Thewinrat, please don't worry about DaneGeld's comment. It looks like pure trolling, and if it leads to anything it should be to DaneGeld being blocked here rather than any consequences for you. When I was your age I would certainly not have been able to contribute as well as you obviouly can to those other projects, and I am sure that there are very few people of your age who could do so. My one piece of advice would be to start off by improving some of the content, rather than getting involved in procedural issues such as article deletion or using advanced permissions. Phil Bridger (talk) 07:30, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

It's not trolling, Phil, it's the truth. Anyway, I've blocked myself over at the English Vikidia and told them to strip my user rights. Be damned if I'm going to see all the people you block here get sent for everyone else to deal with. And yes, this is incivility, so you can block me here too. Dane|Geld 07:38, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

If only Vikidia had a WP:DIVA page, huh? 😉 ——SerialNumber54129 07:42, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Vikidia can have whatever it wants. I just won't be part of making it or tidying up when it goes wrong :) Anyway, enough gibbering. I'm off. Dane|Geld 07:58, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Phil Bridger But something happened to my Vikidia account. It seems to be blocked by DaneGeld in the 22nd of April. Then it was unblocked by Magasin3 for the summary "this person did not vandalize on Vikidia. Leave him a chance." Then, after a while, it gets blocked again by the Magasin3 again without any summary. MediaWiki is strange sometimes. --TheWinRatHere! 15:32, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Vikidia is not a Wikimedia wiki. Praxidicae (talk) 15:38, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Oh sorry, i meant MediaWiki. --TheWinRatHere! 15:41, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Vikidia, which is what you're referring to (DaneGeld doesn't have admin permissions on any Wikimedia wiki), is not affiliated with Wikipedia or any other Wikimedia projects. Here isn't the best place to ask about that. Thanks, Vermont (talk) 21:15, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

A formal apology to you

I want to apologize to you, Thewinrat, for the way I have behaved both here and at Vikidia. When I initially blocked you, it was because I'd assumed (wrongly) that you'd been blocked as a vandal or something bad.

Other users here have clearly told me off and expressed that I should not have blocked you, and they're right. I have unblocked you at Vikidia and apologized to my colleagues there for my behavior. It's wrong for me to expect other people to tow my line without question.

I also recognize that I have given Vikidia and its community a big black eye by giving you a bad view of what we do. I will understand if you do not wish to return; I would not blame you if you didn't, but it's my fault that you have that view.

Please consider coming back and using the service. As I say, you're unblocked and I've made sure other staff know what I've done and why.

I also apologizes to Phil Bridger and others for my comments and gestures towards them too. My judgement and behavior were both very poor and I do deserve to be blocked here as Phil rightly said. I was rude and incivil and others would get the same.

With warm regards, Dane|Geld 00:29, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Unblock Request Comment

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thewinrat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I think i am ready to be unblocked. I have been editing alot on the simple english wikipedia, welcoming users, fixing errors, but the thing is, i think i can get around with WP:CIR. I've been looking at the WP:CIR page on the simple english wikipedia. And i think im ready to be unblocked. Block or Unblock, do what you want to do. TheWinRatHere! 19:09, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

• Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
• Read our guide to improving articles
• Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
• If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
  1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
  2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
     • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
     • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
     • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
     • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
  3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
  4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
  5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
• Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
• When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
  • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 01:04, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What do you want to edit about if unblocked? 331dot (talk) 19:32, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

@331dot: I might help draft pages and pages that were newly made. I may revert vandalism and welcome new users, or tattle the vandals on ARV or UAA. I might help articles by fixing punctuation errors if i ever find one. And i'll stop tagging draft pages. --TheWinRatHere! 15:28, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

I'm not an admin but considering you're asking to be unblocked just so you can engage in the exact areas you were blocked due to incompetence in doesn't seem particularly compelling to me. Praxidicae (talk) 16:49, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

@Praxidicae: The thing is, i dont know what really can. --TheWinRatHere! 16:55, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

 Non-admin comment Honestly, I would suggest leaving the clerking and maintaining for a bit, since that's what got you blocked for...well, incompetence. Choose a topic you're interested in, look for its WikiProject (there's bound to be one), and look through their to-do list. Look for articles with issues and start from there. Rob3512 _chat? ^{what I did} 06:27, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

• News and notes: An Action Packed April

• In the media: Is Wikipedia just another social media site?

• Discussion report: English Wikipedia community's conclusions on talk pages

• Featured content: Anguish, accolades, animals, and art

• Arbitration report: An Active Arbitration Committee

• Traffic report: Mötley Crüe, Notre-Dame, a black hole, and Bonnie and Clyde

• Technology report: A new special page, and other news

• Gallery: Notre-Dame de Paris burns

• News from the WMF: Can machine learning uncover Wikipedia’s missing “citation needed” tags?

• Recent research: Female scholars underrepresented; whitepaper on Wikidata and libraries; undo patterns reveal editor hierarchy

• From the archives: Portals revisited

• Humour: Jimbo and Larry walk into a bar ...

• Opinion: The gaps in our knowledge of our gaps

• Interview: Katherine Maher marks 3 years as executive director

• Community view: 2019 Wikimedia Summit gathers movement affiliate representatives to discuss movement strategy

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:37, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2019).

Administrator changes

HickoryOughtShirt?4 • RexxS

Necrothesp

Bratsche • Kyle Barbour • Kzollman • Madman

Interface administrator changes

Pharos

Bureaucrat changes

Primefac

CheckUser changes

Reaper Eternal

Guideline and policy news

• A request for comment concluded that creating pages in the portal namespace should be restricted to autoconfirmed users.
• Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.

Technical news

• XTools Admin Stats, a tool to list admins by administrative actions, has been revamped to support more types of log entries such as AbuseFilter changes. Two additional tools have been integrated into it as well: Steward Stats and Patroller Stats.

Arbitration

• In response to the continuing compromise of administrator accounts, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion amending the procedures for return of permissions (diff). In such cases, the committee will review all available information to determine whether the administrator followed "appropriate personal security practices" before restoring permissions; administrators found failing to have adequately done so will not be resysopped automatically. All current administrators have been notified of this change.
• Following a formal ratification process, the arbitration policy has been amended (diff). Specifically, the two-thirds majority required to remove or suspend an arbitrator now excludes (1) the arbitrator facing suspension or removal, and (2) any inactive arbitrator who does not respond within 30 days to attempts to solicit their feedback on the resolution through all known methods of communication.

Miscellaneous

• A request for comment is currently open to amend the community sanctions procedure to exclude non XfD or CSD deletions.
• A proposal to remove pre-2009 indefinite IP blocks is currently open for discussion.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

• From the editors: Picture that

• News and notes: Wikimania and trustee elections

• In the media: Politics, lawsuits and baseball

• Discussion report: Admin abuse leads to mass-desysop proposal on Azerbaijani Wikipedia

• Arbitration report: ArbCom forges ahead

• Traffic report: Dark marvels, thrones, a vile serial killer biopic, that's entertainment!

• Technology report: Lots of Bots

• News from the WMF: Wikimedia Foundation petitions the European Court of Human Rights to lift the block of Wikipedia in Turkey

• Recent research: Wikipedia more useful than academic journals, but is it stealing the news?

• Essay: Paid editing

• From the archives: FORUM:Should Wikimedia modify its terms of use to require disclosure?

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

A belated welcome to Vikidia!

Hallo, please see my welcome message on your talk page on Vikidia! JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK 05:43, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

• Discussion report: A constitutional crisis hits English Wikipedia

• News and notes: Mysterious ban, admin resignations, Wikimedia Thailand rising

• In the media: The disinformation age

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

• Traffic report: Juneteenth, Beauty Revealed, and more nuclear disasters

• Technology report: Actors and Bots

• Gallery: Unlike the North Face, Wiki Loves Earth

• Special report: Did Fram harass other editors?

• Recent research: What do editors do after being blocked?; the top mathematicians, universities and cancers according to Wikipedia

• From the archives: Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching

• Opinion: Why the Terms of Use change didn't curtail undisclosed paid editing—and what might

• In focus: WikiJournals: A sister project proposal

• Community view: A CEO biography, paid for with taxes

• Op-Ed: 2019 Wikimedia Affiliate Selected Board Seats Election Results

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:53, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Merry Merry!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello Thewinrat, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Happy editing, ★Trekker (talk) 15:47, 21 December 2019 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

"Ryze disambiguation" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ryze disambiguation. Since you had some involvement with the Ryze disambiguation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. DannyS712 (talk) 06:14, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

"YR2018" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect YR2018. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 28#YR2018 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 15:20, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

	Happy New Year!
	Hello Thewinrat: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. JACKINTHEBOX • TALK 12:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message