T Magierowski

Hello, T Magierowski and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Red Director (talk) 18:41, 24 May 2018 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

== transl. ==

Hi T Magierowski! Could you have a look at the article Poland Fair Play’s sub-section, please? Wouldn’t Fair Play State be more accurate than Fair Play Country for the Państwo Fair Play? The change would affect some other articles (e.g. Polish Coalition), and thus I don’t want to make a mistake. Thank you! TaurenMoonlighting (talk) 13:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Yes, state is more common for political matters. T Magierowski (talk) 18:50, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magnolia Park (Wrocław) (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Magnolia Park (Wrocław) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Magnolia Park (Wrocław), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:47, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello, T Magierowski! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:47, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

LGBT topics

Please help me LGBT_rights_in_Poland LGBT-free_zone (talk) 21:50, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

I learned that in the past you were active in the topics. We need your contribution, because the current formulation are not clear. --Cautious (talk) 09:25, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Magnolia Park (Wrocław)

Hello, T Magierowski. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Magnolia Park".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:48, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

Thank you for your recent articles, including Japanese Garden (Wrocław), which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello and welcome T Magierowski! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland, joining the project, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community.

--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Stanisław Marcin Bukowiec

Hello, T Magierowski,

Thank you for creating Stanisław Marcin Bukowiec.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please try to expand and grow the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lefcentreright}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 12:42, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

9th term Sejm and 10th term Senate of Poland

Thank you for your edit to 9th term Sejm and 10th term Senate of Poland! I just want to point out that there's a purpose for the template:sortname, in that it's important for the sortablility of a table. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!^{Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS).} 13:53, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

Thank you for your recent articles, including Iwona Michałek, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:13, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrzej Sośnierz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agreement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Spoiler effect

Theodore Roosevelt's Progressive Party is listed as centre-left to left-wing even if it originated from the Republican Party which is currently considered to be positioned on the right of the Democratic Party. Abraham Lincoln, who was the first Republican President, was progressive by supporting minority rights in similar fashion to future Democrats like Lyndon B Johnson and Barack Obama. Democrat Franklin Roosevelt is considered to be the legacy of Theodore Roosevelt due to his policies rather than his surname which was the same due to them being distant cousins. Republicans became the conservative party that they are known to be today as a result of William Taft's presidency which preceded Strom Thurmond's candidacy in 1948. Franklin Roosevelt's presidency which paved the way for Truman's that allowed Democrats to hold the White House for two decades was defined by Keynesian economics that are considered to be more left-wing than Friedman whose ideas influenced Reagan's domestic policy which limited the state as well as the neoconservative foreign policy of the Bushes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:3A0F:5F00:E067:2638:DFC1:10B2 (talk) 19:45, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

write here: https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk:Spoiler_effect#Strom_Thurmond_and_Tulsi_Gabbard Tomasz Magierowski (talk) 19:59, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

ORP Bielik (295) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, ORP Bielik (295), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 02:03, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

The article is on an Eastern block boat from the early 1950's, as a result sources are extremely sparse, yet the only thing my article states is it's class, and that it used to serve in the Polish Navy, which is confirmed on both the Polish and English Wikipedia, and the source. Since this article is a translation the source used is on the Polish article. On the Polish article there is also a book source, but I didn't cite it since I do not posses the book, though I could add it since I'm only translating. The picture is from this article: https://twojahistoria.pl/2019/04/15/odszedl-zasluzony-dla-polskiej-marynarki-kontradmiral-ipn-odmowil-mu-wojskowego-pogrzebu/, which also confirms that a boat like "ORP Bielik" existed, and the picture of it shows a Whiskey class. I believe there is nothing of contention in the article. I dream of horses. Tomasz Magierowski (talk) 14:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Different language Wikipedia have different standards. If sourcing is "extremely sparse", it'll probably always be a stub at best on the English Wikipedia, even if the Polish Wikipedia is more forgiving.

It's okay to cite the book as long you can reasonably obtain access to it in a Polish-speaking area.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 04:05, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Łukasz Szumowski moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Łukasz Szumowski, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 10:48, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

There is literally a source for every sentence, what exactly is undersourced? T Magierowski (talk) 10:54, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Changes on 2020 Polish presidential election.

@T Magierowski: Hey,
I saw that you undo my changes and state that "correspondence voting is constitutional" but in my changes I write that "making that "elections" only in correspondence voting form" is against the law. I didn't say that correspondence voiting is illegal e.t.c., I have only say that making a elections ONLY in correspondence way is unconstitutional, like I said it is against with Polish constitution which says that "Art. 287. Elections to the President of the Polish Republic are universal, equal and direct and take place by secret voting" . That type of elections are not universal, equal and direct, for example: Polish citizens outside the country- they won't be able to participate in this also its not direct coz of postmens involve in that. Natanieluz (talk) 12:16, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

@Natanieluz: I added that to the last sentence of the section, is that good? T Magierowski (talk) 13:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

@T Magierowski:, yea is good! Thanks, Natanieluz (talk) 13:11, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

2020 Polish presidential election edit war

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Natanieluz (talk) 11:43, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:ORP Bielik (295)

Hello, T Magierowski. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ORP Bielik".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 20:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

I rescued this and expanded a bit. Cheers, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:14, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

Thank you for your recent articles, including Church of St. Dorothy in Trzcinica, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:57, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

@Piotrus: Yes I'd be interesting in featuring it, though I have a few questions. Firstly, does the article have to be of a specific length? Is the current length enough or do I have to expand it, and how much? Second, how many sources would be enough? I found a few more sources on the internet, but the Polish Wikipedia for instance (where I'd probably translate from) mostly uses books which I don't have. Thank you for your time.T Magierowski (talk) 11:00, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

The lenght should be above stub, so above 250 words. The current article is at 100 or so, so a bit expansion would be nice - seems there's plenty more stuff on pl wiki so it should not be a problem. Sources - one is sufficient, more is better, but each paragraph (or sentence if necessary) should be referenced. It is ok to copy references from pl wiki, if we can AGF they verify things (sometimes you can find snippets on Google Books too). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:13, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

@Piotrus: I've expanded the article quite substantially, do you think it's good now? Also note I added an external link to a video on Youtube that I found with the church's bells playing, I assume there is nothing wrong with that, but I am not very knowledgeable on the rules regarding this. T Magierowski (talk) 15:54, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

It looks much better, lenght-wise, but some reviewers could ask for a reference for the bell section and it is unclear if the parts of the restoration section are referenced or not? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:51, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

@Piotrus: The restoration (exept for the polychrome bullet point) is all cited from reference 5, as I decided putting a reference at every bullet point wouldn't look good. The polychrome is cited by source 6. As for the bells, I added the source, also source 5 (the website of the parish) and rewrote it a bit as many dates on the polish Wikipedia are moved back one year (1951 instead of 1952 for instance). Turns out an IP changed that, really don't know why, so I changed the dates on my article to be in line with what the source says.T Magierowski (talk) 10:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Shoud be good for a DYK now! Let me know if you need any help with the process, it can be a bit scary at first (all those rules!). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:10, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

@Piotrus:To nominate my article I have to add it to Template Talk:Did you know under either the date of creation or expansion correct? If yes, should I use Aug 2 (creation date) or Aug 6 (when I expanded the article)? Thanks for the help. T Magierowski (talk) 20:46, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 10:26, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 16:14, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Law and Justice's position on political spectrum

Hello, there is currently a debate here that might interested you. --Martopa (talk) 14:45, 12 March 2021 (UTC)