Sundar1

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Sundar1! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- LittleOldMe 14:31, 1 December 2006 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

WP

I am wondering if you interest in Wikiproject Germany -- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 04:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Please note: Sundar1

Please note that you have deleted important data from the article "Pokhara" from wikipedia. Please make sure of what you delete before you delete the portions of the article.

Merge tag removal

Please do not removed Merge tags as you have now done twice on your disputed Cuba in Angola article. It can be considered vandalism. — Deon Steyn (talk) 11:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Cuba in Angola

Ich hab dein Posting auf WP:EA gesehen. Da wir beide Deutsch sprechen, vielleicht könntest du die ganze Situation klarer und effizienter auf Deutsch erklären. Ist zwar nicht die "feine Englische", aber das Durchkämmen der history und talk page dauert immer ewig. Bei erster, oberflächlicher Betrachtung scheint das Problem mit dem Vorwurf von WP:OR bzw. WP:NPOV zusammenzuhängen. Aus Erfahrung kann ich dir versichern, dass sich revert wars nie lohnen, wie du ja selbst schon bemerkt hast. Das beste Vorgehen ist es, der "anderen Seite" so früh wie möglich entgegenzukommen und ggf. heftiges editieren hinzunehmen. Wenn du mir also mal in deinen Worten die Sachlage erläuterst, könnte ich versuchen (dann natürlich auf English), besser informiert einen Kompromissvorschlag einzubringen. Dorfklatsch 17:26, January 9, 2008

Ok, ich sag mal so: Meiner Meinung nach ist das Hauptproblem mit Cuba in Angola, dass das Thema durchaus unklar umrissen ist. Eine mögliche Variante des Vorgehens wäre, den jetzigen Artikelinhalt auf eine Unterseite von Angola-Cuba relations zu kopieren und den Inhalt, soweit angebracht, in den Artikel einzubauen. Gleichzeitig könnte man versuchen, ein besser abgrenzbares Thema zu finden, um einen sogenannten content fork, also eine große oder gar vollständige inhaltliche Überlappung, zu vermeiden. Eine Möglichkeit, die mir so vorschwebt, wäre "Cuban political/military involvement in Angola". Ich hab das so mal Deon Steyn vorgeschlagen.

Was das Verhalten aller Beteiligten angeht: Leider passiert es viel zu oft, dass die Leute nicht cool bleiben und anfangen, wenig konstruktiv mit Begriffen wie "Vandalismus" um sich zu werfen. Am besten ignorierst du das und konzentriest dich auf das Wesentliche; in diesem Fall: Wie können die mit verlässlichen Quellen belegbaren Inhalte möglichst neutral wiedergegeben und auf vorhandene oder neue Artikel verteilt werden. Wie gesagt, finde ich persönlich Cuba in Angola als Artikelthema zu unklar. User:Dorftrottel 20:18, January 14, 2008

Ergänzung: "Cuban political/military involvement in Angola" könnte zunächst als Abschnitt in Angola-Cuba relations konzipiert werden. Wenn sich zeigt, dass das Thema zu vielschichtig ist, kann man sich dann immer noch darauf verlagern, einen eigenen Artikel zu planen. User:Dorftrottel 20:21, January 14, 2008

Information zum korrekten "Verhaltenskodex" findest du z.B. auf WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA etc. Lohnenswert ist auch ein Blick auf Kriterien für Vandalismus. M.E.n. ist keiner der edits auf dem Artikel ernsthaft als absichtlich schädigend zu bezeichnen, daher sind Vandalismusvorwürfe (die ohnehin nie ein positives Ergebnis zeitigen) auf allen Seiten absolut unangebracht. Ein besseres Verhalten, als sich strikt an inhaltlichen Fragestellungen zu orientieren, ist nicht möglich. Demensprechend sollte sollten alle Beteiligten auf z.B. politisch ausgerichtete Ad hominems verzichten. Generell sehr wichtig ist auch, nicht auf ein niedriges Niveau zu verfallen oder sich einzulassen, ganz unabhängig davon, was die "Gegenseite" macht. Kommt dir ein Posting beleidigend, ungerecht, etcpp vor, ignoriere dies, und fahre unbeirrt fort, dich strikt auf die Sachebene zu konzentrieren (siehe z.B. de:Themenzentrierte Interaktion). Was ich persönlich in derartigen Auseinandersetzungen für unabdingbar halte, und was nur allzu oft völlig fehlt, ist die a priori Bereitschaft, sich durch gute Argumente überzeugen zu lassen. Das Hauptproblem, wenn Leute die Ruhe verlieren, besteht meiner Meinung nach darin, dass es oft dazu führt, dass sich weniger hochwertige Argumente durchsetzen. Fazit: Mehr, als die eigene Argumentation möglichst sachlich anbringen, kann ich dir bzgl. Verhalten nicht empfehlen. Bedenke, dass jede inhaltliche Auseinandersetzung die Verbesserung der Wikipedia zum Ziel hat, also mache dies zur Maxime deiner Argumentation. User:Dorftrottel 16:02, January 17, 2008

Thanks for the article, but you also noted that Wikipedia is a playground for rightwing politics. Especially articles relating to southern Africa are easy prey to diehards of Apartheid, distorting facts up to being unreconizable. It is hard to come up against those, since they have too much time. I had resigned, since I do not want to spend all my time on an editing war with White Supremacists. But maybe ... are there more like you? --L.Willms (talk) 06:41, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Cuba in Angola

An editor has nominated Cuba in Angola, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuba in Angola and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, Sundar1! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be. Wikipedia:WikiProject Germany | watch Wikipedia:German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board | watch

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 06:45, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Cuban Intervention in Angola

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Cuban intervention in Angola (1975-1991). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
(edit copied from source, later moved to New York Accords) Socrates2008 (Talk) 13:53, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Cuban intervention in Angola (1975-1991) appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Socrates2008 (Talk) 00:39, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

IMHO your article is really very valuable and does not really suffer from POV problems. stylistic revisions would be useful if it were not for the constant threat of revert wars from biased editors who seem to have had their very first impressions of this subject from SADF propaganda and have difficulty adjusting to the world-wide scholarly and journalistic consensus (not a monolithic consensus, to be sure). If the subject were less controversial, the usual encyclopedic practice of relying largely on one secondary source would be acceptable. Most encyclopedia writers in the world simply paraphrase one secondary source for their article. One could easily add sources to your article from John Marcum, DAvid Birmingham, karl Maier et hoc genus omne, and nothing substantive in your article would be changed. Maple Leaf Forever!130.15.101.140 (talk) 15:57, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Cuban intervention in Angola (1975-1991)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Cuban intervention in Angola (1975-1991), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuban intervention in Angola (1975-1991). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Socrates2008 (Talk) 10:36, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.

I have read your contributions to the Angolan conflict and I can not believe the bias you show, keeping in mind that you have no direct involvement or refernce to what happened there. You sound like one of those armchair liberals that visited Africa once or twice and know consider yourself to be an expert on Sub-Saharan politics and history. For the rest you obviously rely on selective sources to suport your views of the world. I find the contributions you keep on making to the pages relating to the Angolan conflict, and can't help but wonder why you have such a strong opinion on an event that has no bearing on your past or future. I am not a Namibian, Angolan or South African citizen, but had the privilege to stay in the north of Namibia (Grootfontein) during the conflict. I have been in the south of Angola on a number occasions and I have spoken to quite a few people on both sides that was at Cuito. I know that it is not very objective to rely on eyewitness acounts, but what I want to mention is that neither of these people (on both sides) that did the actual fighting are willing to claim victory. On the other hand it appears that a lot of armchair soldiers with "facts" from various sources tries to reconstruct the battle in such a way as to claim victory for their side.

I am willing to concede that I also may have a biased view on this conflict, but at least I can claim that my family was directly afected by the conflict and that I had numerous dealings with people that actively participated in the conflict. I am very curious to know what the real reason for your bias is. Having lived in South Africa for a number of years now I have come to the one realisation: The liveration movements in Southern Africa have mostly benefited from good propaganda engines. These Marxist supported liberation movements have just as much blood on their hands as the regimes they replaced.

As Canadian you would better serve the public domain if you start investigating the involvement of the US government in maby of these Third World conflict.

Advertising

I just noticed how large the page had got. I wonder if it would be a good idea to spin off a new article Criticism of advertising and reduce the section to 2 or 3 paragraphs? Cheers. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 23:56, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately at the moment it will have be be fairly low on my priority as well. I'll need to think about it for a while. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 14:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Speyer Cathedral talk

• I must apologise for not realising that part of your recent addition was your own competent translation. I am sorry if that comment seemed patronising.
• Referring to any work of art as a "pastiche" is rather insulting. That was ICOMOS word, not mine.
• The royal plural(?). No, it's not quite like that. Another editor, Johnbod, also entered the discussion, and has also contributed to (mostly) English art/architecture articles. The attitude to which I am referring is the attitude expressed in general by English architectural historians who list all the various building stages of each building, including the Victorian additions.
• Because of this, I have been trying to make sense somehow of your extraordinary degree of upset at seeing the Neo-Romanesque facade of Speyer used to illustrate a section on Neo-Romanesque architecture and your insistence on "purity" of the building. If your attitude isn't linked to national pride, and isn't simply ignorance (which it obviously isn't), then what's your problem?

It is not as if there is no mention of Speyer Cathedral in the article. There are several places in the article in which Speyer is cited as an example. There are a great many other Romanesque buildings which are not mentioned at all.

• One of the things which I find quite hilarious is that for months and months I was hassled by a Polish art student who was absolutely incensed at the notion of my citing any German Romanesque buildings whatsoever, on the grounds that they had all been so heavily restored that almost none of them was in its original form. According to this person, the buildings had been literally vandalised for the sake of "purity". She (I think it was a woman) was extraordinarily critical of my use of Bamberg Cathedral as an example.

On delving into the matter a little, I discovered, of course, that her claims were true- that in 19th century Germany Baroque domes, towers, facades and altars were pulled down, that Gothic chapels and porches were demolished, that genuine Romanesque towers which didn't quite match were made to match and so on and so on. It was not a case of conserving what "was". It was a case of purging buildings of any details that did not contibute to "purity of style", whether that style was Romanesque, Gothic or Baroque. The older the building, the more it was likely to have been modified, and therefore the more likely that it should suffer this ruthless reconstruction.

This 19th century German attitude was very different to the attitude which prevailed in England at the same time. Many of the great abbey churches in Germany and France had relatively short building periods, and then were later added to, with smaller additions such as chapels. In England however, every cathedral except one (Salisbury) grew at a very slow rate. The architects almost never tried to make the parts match. I don't think that either France or Germany have a single large abbey or cathedral that is as diverse in its parts as are the huge cathedrals of Canterbury, Gloucester, Lincoln, Durham or Ely. Durham, often cited as the greatest example of Romanesque architecture on the planet, has never suffered the type of re-conversion that is normal to German Romanesque buildings. So it retains a Gothic eastern transept, three Gothic towers and a large Gothic western window, none of which, had the building been in Germany, would have survived the 19th century. We would have ended up with Durham looking as pristine a piece of Romanesque architecture as Speyer does, minus that diversity that is so typically English.

• About using material from other articles- using large slabs of material from other articles or books is not permissable. The only permissable circumstances are 1) translating from Wikipedia that is in another language, 2) using material from 1911 Britannica. For any other material that you quote, you must put the material in quotation marks. You can quote "phrases" within the text, and short sections using indents. If you are drawing extensively from another source, say for a description of a building, then you need to paraphrase it.

So it is fine to say: 'Peter Bloggs says of St Augustine's Abbey "it is the noblest and grandest ruin in Europe".'

It isn't fine to simply copy and paste Peter Bloggs' whole description of the abbey. This is why I utilised the ICOMOS material and cited ICOMOS a number of times as a source. I included one of the most pertinent quotes about the overall quality of the building, as a direct quote in quotation marks.

My description of the building itself is merely a straightforward description of the features that are clear on the plan and in photos, using the photos and plan as a primary source. ie. it has a a single nave and aisles, an apsidal east end, etc etc. I should probably go back and write "see plan" after it.

• Ecclesiastical status- for every cathedral, its status as a cathedral is mentioned in the first sentence.
• "Basilica". The word is used in two ways, and in this article it is applied in both of them. Ecclesiastically, it is a "Minor Basilica". Architecturally, it can be described as having a "basilica" plan ie. long with a nave and aisles rather than centrally planned like the old cathedral at Aachen. I think that it is rather confusing to use the word twice in the same article to mean different things, and generally avoid using "basilica" as an architectural term unless referring to the Constantinian basilica churches of Rome.

Toodle-oo! I'm going to have dinner at the pub. Amandajm (talk) 07:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Not metric actually

I rolled back the LRC edits. Metrification was just starting when the LRC was introduced, and railway terminology remained Imperial throughout. Even today the speed signs are all in mph. You also converted many units that aren't really measurements, like railway gauge. Like "two by four", this isn't really a measurement so much as the name of a standard. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:50, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

List of Cities by GDP AFD

Hello, would you care to comment here - Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_cities_by_GDP - ? I'm not sure what brought you to that article, but saw your comment on its talk page. Cheers. THEPROMENADER 06:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Pretzel

I would respectfully request that you please participate in the pending dispute resolution at Talk:Pretzel, lest your previous reversions be seen as tendentious now that the information that you desired remains in the article, though tagged. Thanks. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 13:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Talk: Pretzel

Comment on Style: Self analysis and Self evlauation is a healthy process. As a wiki author you appear to be single minded (regardless of what you stated) and have completely diluted the article and information.

I read what other contributors to this article have stated and talk of similar issues with your style, so I do not see this as personal but rather one of style. I can only assume that your concerns for German overtones have overwhelmed the real story and has very artfully destoryed earlier more exciting informational versions.

(1) Points of Information: Pretzel is a food with a distintive shape. That is the real story. The fact that there are other shapes is just marketing by manafacturers or poitical interests that are built on the word "pretzel". How about the pizza pretzel? Is it a pizza or a pretzel. It is about sales $$$$$.

(2) Points of Infromation: John Jr. (talk) 14:01, 24 January 2010 (UTC)"Party" Pretzel is something you made up. It is not a common use of the word or term anywhere except in a cookbook to create popular terms.

putting an image on its feet

sometimes i upload a photo and it ends up sideways (because that's the way i took it). even though i make sure to file the picture in an upright position, on commons it ends up sideways again. how can i change this? can i turn the picture after it's on commons? what can i do to avoid this problem?Sundar1 (talk) 11:56, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi Sundar

It is quite easy to turn an image. Go to the image you want to turn and hit the edit button. Then you add the command: {{rotate|90}}. (you can use either 90, 180 or 270 degrees) The image will be turned the next day so you can sit back and... wait. I did an example with one of your images here: File:SpeyerCathedralAfraChapel2.JPG. The reason why this happens is, that there are different ways of how one can turn an image. Either one turns the real physical image, or its written into the EXIF that the image should be viewed by turning it clockwise. The problem is, that not all programs react the same. some only use the physical image rotation, some use the EXIF and some both.--Amada44 (talk) 12:35, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

For the second question: see also Commons:FAQ#How_do_I_fix_the_orientation_of_an_image.3F. -- User:Docu at 12:39, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Cabinda

Hello: I just saw that you eliminated from the article on Cabinda (Province) some basic economic information. I think it would make sense to leave it there, because the reader of the Cabinda article is entitled to the basic information on the reasons and conditions of the ongoing Cabindan separatism. -- Aflis (talk) 16:50, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Sorry: that was hasty reading on my side. I apologize. Aflis (talk) 17:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Angola

I want now finally take up your invitation of four years ago. You might have noted that I added some stuff related to Angola. --L.Willms (talk) 14:04, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

September 2012

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nicaraguan general election, 1984, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, DVdm (talk) 13:20, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Nicaraguan general election, 1984. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. DVdm (talk) 13:33, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

My apologies for this. See also this. DVdm (talk) 16:35, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

apology accepted. Sundar1 (talk) 09:04, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Sanphebagar

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sanphebagar, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://hewgill.com/~greg/wikiblame/simple/Asyut.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 10:47, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Great photo! Bruno Russell (talk) 13:58, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

History of Speyer

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of History of Speyer, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://igeonote.com/city/map/1425322/speyer-rheinland-pfalz-germany.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

it's rather the other way around: the content in http://igeonote.com/city/map/1425322/speyer-rheinland-pfalz-germany is entirely taken from wikipedia.Sundar1 (talk) 09:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of village development committees of Nepal may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ], [[Kabahigoth]], [[Kabahijabdi]], [[Kachorwa]], [[Kakadi]], '''[[Kalaiya|Kalaiya Municipality]]]''', [[Karaiya, Narayani|Karaiya]], [[Khopawa]], [[Khutwajabdi]], [[Kolhabi]], [[Kudawa]], [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:07, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank You ...

Thank You for your deeds in Wikipedia. Appreciated (y) ... Sajan Subba (talk) 05:57, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Devachuli

If this spelling change from "Devachuli" to "Devchuli" is correct, then the whole page needs moving, not just the text changed. I have reverted for now. You might want to take it up with page creator Dr. Blofeld. 220 of ^Borg 20:32, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kulturkampf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Progress. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kulturkampf may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• by legislation restricting the Catholic church's political power".{{Sfn | Hollyday | 1970 | p = 6}}}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:02, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kulturkampf

added links pointing to Victor Emmanuel, Benedict XIII, Victor Amadeus and Charles Emmanuel

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grand Duchy of Baden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palatinate German. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lower Franconia

added a link pointing to Rhenish Palatinate

Middle Franconia

added a link pointing to Rhenish Palatinate

Swabia (Bavaria)

added a link pointing to Rhenish Palatinate

Upper Franconia

added a link pointing to Rhenish Palatinate

Upper Palatinate

added a link pointing to Rhenish Palatinate

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Middle Franconia may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• also involved some border changes or territorial swaps. Thus the district name of Rezatkreis change]]d to Upper Franconia.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rhenish helm, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Apex and Romanesque. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lalitpur District, Nepal

added a link pointing to Kaleshwar

Lower Franconia

added a link pointing to Middle

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Unterdonaukreis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freyung. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chitwan District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bharatpur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Khotang District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kubhinde. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of village development committees of Nepal

added a link pointing to Harinagar

Shadanand

added a link pointing to Mulpani

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sundar1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

HI!!

Hi, Sundar1. I grew up about 3 hours from your hometown in Upstate New York. Glad to see someone else from that neck of the woods. I have been searching for the guidelines for WIKIgermany : Conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia or in german Konflikt-of-Interest-Bearbeitung auf Wikipedia. Can you send me the link to this page for the German wikipedia? I'm having trouble locating it.Chefmikesf (talk) 19:50, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Gustav Landauer

Hello, most of the article on Gustav Landauer was recently removed as it lacked references. This is a pity in my opinion. I believe you wrote most of it, translating from the German Wikipedia. I wonder if the text could be restored with some references? Cheers, AxelBoldt (talk) 22:01, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sundar1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sundar1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Happy Dashain!

Namaste, Sundar1, and Happy Dashain!

WikiProject Nepal wishes you a wonderful Dashain filled with joy, love, and happiness.

Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a great Dashain! Cheers.

Message sent by CAPTAIN MEDUSA on behalf of WikiProject Nepal.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Throws a Poke-ball

I caught you, don't move! I had to go through 24 alleged German-speaking editors on Category:Available translators in Wikipedia only to discover you're one of only two still hopefully active :P Anyways, I'm writing Haltlose personality disorder which is an absolutely phenomenal article (if I do say so myself) that has shorter versions in Dutch, Portugeuese and Romanian...but oddly enough, not in German...despite all the sources on the English article being by Schneider, Kraepelin, Bleuler, Kahn, Aschaffenburg and the like. I wondered if you could do up at least a very short version on the German wikipedia to get it started, since you can use all the same sources as on the English article...which relies almost exclusively on German sources. I did also ask User:Pjt56 the same request, so you two might trip over each other there. Thanks! :P HaltlosePersonalityDisorder (talk) 20:40, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

You have been pruned from the Wikipedia:WikiProject Nepal/Members list.

Hi Sundar1! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Nepal/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 1 year.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Nepal/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:01, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Test2

This page has been tagged for deletion as a redirect from an implausible typo, due to speedy deletion criterion R3.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mast303 (talk) 00:23, 30 January 2023 (UTC)