SpeedyGonsales
Here are some links I thought useful:
- Wikipedia:Tutorial
- Wikipedia:Help desk
- M:Foundation issues
- Wikipedia:Policy Library
- Wikipedia:Utilities
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Wikiquette
- Wikipedia:Civility
- Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
- Wikipedia:List of images
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
- Wikipedia:Current polls
- Wikipedia:Mailing lists
- Wikipedia:IRC channel
Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. The Wikipedia:Village pump is also a good place to go for quick answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.
Sam [Spade] 14:46, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Thank you on useful pointers, Sam! But you won't see much of my work here, as I am dominantly oriented to work on Croatian Wikipedia, which you can se here: My work.
On English Wikipedia up to now I only added links to croatian Wikipedia, but in future I may write something related to my field of interest, if there will be need to add something to Science fiction or Computer security topics.
SpeedyGonsales 16:28, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Help with translation
editHi there, I see you are en-3 and hr-N, so I wondered if you could check my translation on this page: Reproduction of Croatian currency. This page is going to be linked from a Template on commons.wikimedia.org, so I'd like it to be in perfect English... hope you could help. PS, I'm especcialy uncertain whether I got the "nema središnje značenje" correctly translated to "hasn't got central place". I really don't know how to put it correctly... --Dijxtra 09:48, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
Hi,
I address you as the ambassador of your wikipedia. Please notice the above project.
This project, more than other projects, will benefit from inter-wiki cooperation. Can you post a message regarding this project at your wikipedia village pump?
Thanks for your help, APH from the English wiki
Medieval Croatia
editIs the ethnical border of Serbs and Croats in the early Medieval ages something like Una-Cetina region or something else? HolyRomanEmperor 15:51, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
Your opinions sound very rational. I guess that we can only draw facts on borders of the states, not based on ethnicity (during Tomislav's realm there was an abundence of Serbs in Croatia, possibly brought through his most eastern territories; King Dragutin mentions Croats as one of the peoples living with Serbs in Usora, Soli and Srijem; etc.) 12:08, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
I don't understand one thing, though. Zahumlje (nor Paganija, for that matter) weren't part of King Tomislav's realm... HolyRomanEmperor 12:13, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
And Krešimir held Pagania under his proctetorate only. Zachlumia was a part of the Slav Kingdom of Doclea. HolyRomanEmperor 12:16, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
Yes, I get it. HolyRomanEmperor 15:13, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
I am glad that the Greater Serbian article of Catholic Serbs got deleted. May I invite you to make with me a new one? (my research on that field is almost finished; while I am lacking info on Orthodox Croats) HolyRomanEmperor 12:52, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Oh, I can wait a hundred years. Just yes or no? HolyRomanEmperor
Oh, I can wait a hundred years. Just yes or no? HolyRomanEmperor 17:13, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Ruđer Josip Bošković, Conte Orsatti di Pozza (Medo Pucić), Kralj Stefan Dragutin Nemanjić, Veliki Župan Stefan Nemanja, Pero Budmani, Milan Rešetar, Raffo di Pozza (Rafo Pucić), Frano Gundulić (Gondola), Ivo Andrić, Niko Pucić, ???? Zlatarić, Antun Fabris.... Jel' mogu ovi? HolyRomanEmperor 17:16, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
Ah, da :) Dominiko Zlatarić, Nikola Bošković, Luko Zore, V/Baltazar Bogišić, Petar i Paskva (Pasco) Pucić (Pozza), Dživo (Ivan) Gundulić (Gondola), Dane Rastić, Michael i Marinus de Resti, Simona Mathie de Resti, Symeon Sclani de Resti, Vita Volcii de Resti, Matija Ban, Marko Car, ... HolyRomanEmperor 17:30, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
Luko Zore was a Croatian, catholic by birth, who was one of the leading opposition fighting against the foreign forces of Austro-hungarian Empire and Italy in Dubrovnik. In that time there were two major intelectual streams in Dubrovnik as well as in the whole Croatia: First one was for the union of all the slavic people believing that all the slavic people were of one nation ( Ilirski preporod), which was prevailing in Dubrovnik, and the second one was for croatian state of croatian people which was much weaker since they were not able to resist the forces of bribed political power of that time only by themselves. Luko Zore therefore entered and was an active part of all the slavic associations available in that time in Dubrovnik, trying to fight the foreign political power and to develop the idea of national identity of the language and slavic origins. Mediteranac 16:39, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Yes, ofcourse, the article's subject are the Dalmatian Serbs (some from Dubrovnik or elsewhere) and the harsh Venetian forceful conversions to Catholicism (te list was those who would be mentioned in the article) HolyRomanEmperor 15:35, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
...vidim da si ti zapoceo ovaj clanak, pa mislim da bi trebalo da izjasnis svoje misljenje o njemu (znatno sam ga prosirio) --HolyRomanEmperor 19:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Prijevod
editHej, neki momak se na commonsima trudi prevest neke dvije recenice na razne jezike. Zamolio me, i ja sam mu obavio prijevod na hrvatski, no molio bih tebe da provjeris da li sam to dobro obavio (vjerujem da vi imate razradjenu teminologiju, pa provjeri da li sam ju dobro slijedio...). Prijevodi se nalaze ovdje: [1] --Dijxtra 10:33, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Jimbo u RH
editHej, pred nekih mjesec dana načuo sam informaciju da će Jimbo doći u Hrvatsku, no od tad više ni traga ni glasa nekoj sličnoj informaciji. Znaš li ti išta o tome? --Dijxtra 21:26, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, slijep sam :-\ Uglavnom, hvala! --Dijxtra 09:56, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
COTW Project
editYou voted for Lipovans, this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. -Scottwiki 04:57, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thanks!
editPosted by (^'-')^ Covington 07:50, 24 April 2006 (UTC), on behalf of the the AID Maintenance Team
Posted by (^'-')^ Covington 07:23, 1 May 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the the AID Maintenance Team
Skalić
editHvala ti SpeedyGonsales što si popravio članak o Skaliću jer je dio o nacionalnosti naprosto jedna teška nebuloza kojoj tamo sigurno nije mjesto. Ali izgleda da ekipa (Primetime posebno) jednostavno nije sposobna shvatiti neke stvari, a izgeda da im niti zdrava logika nije jača strana.
Drže se ko pijan plota svojih enciklopedija, za koje se jednostavno mora priznati da su poprilično loše, i nikakvi argumenti se uopće niti ne razmatraju. Dovoljno je to što se u "svetim" knjigama nalaze drukčiji podaci. Nažalost Primetime je ponovno vratio ono što si ti maknuo na razgovor, tek toliko da znaš. Pa ako ti se uopće da petljati s ovim likovima... Ako ti se da baviti takvim budalama kao što su naša dvojica junaka, molim te javi još ponekom sa Hr. wikipedije da također ode na istu stranicu, i na stranicu o enciklopediji gdje stalno brišu podatak da je Skalić Hrvat, pa neka to ljudi isprave- neka djeluju na te ljude. Ujedinjeni smo jači!
srdačan pozdrav,
Goran
Please help on William Shakespeare
editPosted by PruneauT 01:01, 20 June 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the AID maintenance team.
A copyvio at the hr-WP
editHi there! I see that you are an admin at the Croatian WP and also the "ambassador"... It seems that the article hr:Ferdo Livadić (created in November 2004) is a copyright violation from this article, which existed already in February 2004 (see the Internet Archive). Could you please deal with this appropriately? I have not figured out how to report a copyvio at the hr-WP. Thanks! Lupo 11:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- You said you'd look into this. And...? I don't see any action, so you must have come to the conclusion that it wasn't a copyvio. Would you please explain why? Lupo 09:53, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for following up on this one. Glad to see that this has been resolved. And I'm even more glad that it turns out to be a properly licensed copy. The author of the off-Wikipedia site was and is aware of course that a "Wikipedia-only" release is not good enough and thus did license his texts as GFDL, I presume. Lupo 19:34, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Another editor has started two articles, Croatian Association of Prisoners in Serbian Concentration Camps and Union of Croatian Homeland War Volunteers Association, which may be deleted for not being notable. If you can expand either article, I would be grateful. You may also want to look at Croatian Worldwide Association -- Eastmain 06:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Good morning
editYou know me from Croatian wiki, but here I have different name. This is just FYI. In case that you need any help with translations or something else. I am very good at Croatian history as well as ...--Billy the lid 08:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Would you look at the article Spencer Boone, about a supposed 19th-century Croatian politician? For reasons I have stated on its talk page, I suspect it to be a hoax, and I would be glad to have your view. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- I answered on talk page, and per your talk page, I answer you here :-) that if you need any additional explanation, check #wikipedia-hr on freenode (as there are almost always one or two hr wiki admins, but please observe the timezone :-) Thanks for warning! SpeedyGonsales (talk) 18:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you, just what I wanted to know. I tagged it for deletion - already gone. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:23, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Draža
editPošto si me blokirao na hr vikipediji moram ovako da ti se obratim. Dražu nisam ja rehabilitovao, već srpski sud, isti onaj koji ga je i osudio 1946. godine. Komunistička presuda protiv Mihailovića je jedina u celom svetu koliko znam, a i ta jedina je povučena, tako da Draža nigde nije osuđen za ratne zločine osim u glavama nekih ljudi. Draža je ZVANIČNO(a to se valjda jedino i gleda na vikipediji ako se ne varam, zvanični podaci) borac protiv fašizma, i saradnik saveznika, a to što je po tebi(i mnogima na hr vikipediji) neprihvatljivo da on stoji među saveznicima je nešto potpuno nebitno i nerelevantno. Kao što sam verujem napomenuo u prošlom razgovoru, u USA četništvo nije zabranjeno, za razliku od fašizma npr, a zakoni USA vladaju na wikipediji, zar ne? Dražu je odlikovala Amerika, to je činjenica. Amerika nije povukla odlikovanje, to je činjenica. U Americi kao i u celom svetu osim u BiH i Hrvatskoj, Draža je među saveznicima. To što je po tebi nemoralno da neko šalje Trumanova jaja ubicama čoveka koga su ti isti odlikovali, je opet POTPUNO NEBITNO, kao i svi tvoji "logični" zaključci(koji spadaju pod originalno istraživanje, koje je zabranjeno, a koga ima na pretek na hr viki) u vezi ove teme. Stvar je jako jednostavna, čovek nigde nikada(pa ni pred "narodnim sudom") nije osuđen za ratni zločin, i stoga NIKAKO NE MOŽE BITI RATNI ZLOČINAC (zvanično). I da, baš mi je drago što si me blokirao, jedino mi je žao što mi nisi dao večni blok, da pokažeš koliko si stvarno nemoćan da se suočiš sa činjenicama... Vule91 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.195.223 (talk) 15:49, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Right back @ ya!
editHappy 2009 to you too!
By the way, thanks for fixing my page. When I wrote that I was not very skilled at speaking Croatian :)
Do not be so quick to revert
editIt's correct to write such notice, but I would use Google before. If you will answer me, do it on my talk page. I hope you'll find my advice leading you to work better, not as allowing vandals more freedom. Regards. SpeedyGonsales (talk) 16:01, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- I actually did a Google News search for him and found no relevant matches. I still don't see any media mention of his death. I don't speak Croatian, though. If you do find a link, I think you should add it to the article because I still think it is lacking. --Zvika (talk) 18:05, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Popis
editPopis sam stavio na en. wikipediju jer samo nju pratim. Oni koji rade na hr. wikipediji mogu ga slobodno kopirati s en. wikipedije. Iako manje, popis je koristan i ovdje jer npr. imena ostaju jednako napisana bez obzira na jezik. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vedranf (talk • contribs) 16:41, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Peruča vs Peruća
editHi Speedy. Why you think its Peruća?
- Peruča, akumulacijsko jezero na gornjem toku Cetine, kraj Sinja; 13 km2, dubina do 64 m. HE.[1]
- ^ Hrvatski leksikon (1996-1997) (in Croatian)
--Kebeta (talk) 19:26, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- O.K. --Kebeta (talk) 12:42, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Sources
editIf there are five high-quality references (university publications, primary sources) that say "the sun is yellow", and you arrive with a source that says "the sun is blue", you cannot simply write "the sun is blue, yellow" and then cry "don't write against sources!" when someone removes that. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 12:15, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
- 1) Concerning sources in general. Perhaps the post above was not clear? The sources listed exclude "Croatian" and support "Croatian or Serbian". In other words, you have one source that is contradicted by all the others, so how can you add both contradicting facts? In short please "DO NOT edit-war to push your edit", per policy. (Whether the check is "pending!" or not is not my concern. I hardly need notification of your daily activities.)
- 2) Concerning the contradiction in this specific case. Now please understand the following: Your source is indeed high quality and is not really wrong - your source is correct. Within Croatia-Slavonia both the names "Croatian" and "Croatian or Serbian" were indeed used - for one and the same language (none of this is imaginary, see source on Talk:Kingdom of Croatia-Slavonia). However, the reason why of these two "Croatian or Serbian" is currently in the infobox is because in Austria-Hungary, and in all official documents of the state, the name "Croatian or Serbian" is always used. In the rest of Austria-Hungary, outside the Kingdom of Croatia-Slavonia, the name "Croatian or Serbian" is the only name for the language (while both were used in C-S). In Dalmatia, for example, the language was only known as "Croatian or Serbian". This was all because there "was no method to distinguish between the languages, even if such a desire existed".
- I really hope you read the above carefully... I get the feeling this is one of those things I'll have to repeat. Regards --DIREKTOR (TALK) 15:42, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
- Polite? I did NOT mean to sound arrogant or anything! (Keep in mind that raw text can be ambiguous.) I was just hoping I'd have your full attention. But if you want to talk about politeness than I suggest that first and foremost you stop edit-warring to introduce your edit. Its still there and it can be easily restored. Edit-warring destroys conversation.
- Never mind how many there are, they are not wrong and they do not contradict my sources so its not an issue.
- "Opposite"? Its not the "opposite" at all, and there are sources of my own... wait. You did not read point "2)" of my post, did you?
- Please read my post completely. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 16:09, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
- Polite? I did NOT mean to sound arrogant or anything! (Keep in mind that raw text can be ambiguous.) I was just hoping I'd have your full attention. But if you want to talk about politeness than I suggest that first and foremost you stop edit-warring to introduce your edit. Its still there and it can be easily restored. Edit-warring destroys conversation.
- If you make a new edit and it is reverted, please have the courtesy, the patience, and prudence to wait for a while until the matter can be discussed. If your version gets reverted, please do not immediately start edit-warring. And I can see that my appeal was well placed. You still did not read my post completely. Was my wording unclear?
- (P.S. You do not know what revisionism is. "Revisionism" is not when you find something you and your buddies think is wrong.) --DIREKTOR (TALK) 17:33, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
File:Spomen ploca Nikola Tesla 0108.JPG
editHi, SpeedyGonsales
I'm wondering if File:Spomen ploca Nikola Tesla 0108.JPG should have the {{pd-art}} tag for it's copyright since Croatia grants freedom of panorama to public plaques, instead of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
Wikimania discussion
editHi, we just met over lunch at Wikimania. This is just a note to make contact. Your talk was entertaining as I predicted... :-) Dovi (talk) 11:47, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
- Just wanted to mention that I was the person (in the jacket) to whom you talked to during the break. Ironically, I came expecting to meet Dovi, but missed him.Mzk1 (talk) 14:32, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- It's my username, at hotmail.comMzk1 (talk) 20:54, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ZP logo.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:ZP logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:38, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Croatian independence referendum
editHi! I'm working on expanding and referencing the Croatian independence referendum, 1991 article, and I'm struggling to find any relevant images. I saw a poster image on Croatian wiki article, but since it's not available on the Commons, I'm wondering whether it would be alright to upload it to en wiki and use it as a fair-use image. What do you think?--Tomobe03 (talk) 20:55, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Actually it really appears that the poster is not copyrightable under the Croatian law. Article 8 Section 2.1 of the Copyright Act says that official works published in order to inform the public are not subject to copyright protection. I'm unsure what type of licensing should be applied in the commons though.--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:21, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Your HighBeam account is ready!
editGood news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:
- Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
- Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
- If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
- The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
- To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
- If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
- A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
- HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
- Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
- When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 21:03, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Images
editThanks for providing photos of Giovanni Cernogoraz and Sandra Perković. Images are sometimes not easy to come by, so these contributions are certainly appreciated! GregorB (talk) 23:07, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
You've got mail!
editMessage added 09:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
Bot Trial Complete
editPlease turn your bot off and please make sure you follow your bot's contributions so that it does not exceed the allowed trial.—cyberpower ChatOffline 23:29, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Help with a Croatian translation?
editHello SpeedyGonsales, how are you? You were recommended to me by Keegan as a good person to talk to about Croatian wikipedia. We are planning on rolling out the new VisualEditor to hr.wiki in a few weeks. I have a message to the hr.wikipedians, do you have time to do a short translation for me? Regards, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 02:34, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Need help from Croatian users
editJimbo Wales is asking for aditional input from Croatian users regarding the situation on Croatian Wikipedia. Please feel free to voice your opinion. Regards! Timbouctou (talk) 21:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Violation of freedom of speech on hr.wikipedia
editWe have met in 2005, and I very much respect your efforts in contributing to and helping administer Croatian Wikipedia. However I am very very disappointed by the kinds of editorial policies you have decided to adopt. You, Suradnik:Zeljko, and others are blocking users on hr.wikipedia for telling you things you don't like, in ways you don't like. If you are truly committed to the principles of Wikipedia in general, I would like to ask you to address the substance, not the tone of the criticism, or the graphics someone chooses to describe one's positions.
I have currently been blocked on hr.wiki for changing graphics on my user page. The graphics in question are not that much different from those used by Suradnik:Starčevićanac to express his opposition to totalitarian regimes. I changed them after you have deleted the Userbox that contained the same graphics as "vandalism." I think the decision to block me is utterly unacceptable, but I don't expect we'll agree on this. I would just like to ask you to let me know for how long I have been blocked, because I would like to continue to contribute to the discussion, both in constructive conversation & by work on hr.wiki articles.
Many thanks. – Miranche T C 00:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Correction, I see now that only my user page has been blocked. Will continue talk on hr.wiki – Miranche T C 01:05, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
- Another correction, I see that I've been blocked for 3 months. Strangely, all pages still say "Uredi"/"Edit". Well, that's that. I guess I'm the least of your problems these days, I do hope you know what you're doing. But I won't hold my breath. – Miranche T C 05:50, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
wikEd translation
editHi SpeedyGonsales,
I have updated your wikEd translation to the current version (0.9.119c). It would be great if you could find the time to translate the new additions into English. Please let me know here if you have any questions or suggestions.
Thanks in advance, Cacycle (talk) 14:03, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
editVolume 1, Issue 1, October 2013
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 19:55, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library Survey
editAs a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 14:48, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Your bot on English Wikipedia
editA proposal to de-authorize a group of idle interwiki bots on the English Wikipedia is currently in process. A bot account of yours has been included in the list. If you are no longer using this bot, no action is neccessary by you. Should you wish to revive your bot in the near future, please remove your bot from the list here: en:Wikipedia:Bot_owners'_noticeboard#Interwiki_Bot_that_are_inactive. Thank you for your contributions. For the en: Bot Approvals Group, Magioladitis (talk) 17:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Welcome
editThank You for Your welcome of mine. Unfortunately I cannot speak&understand Croatian. Yours, Agricola Planitius (sitting in a building next to the prison of Salzburg [Mr. Sanader, You know...]).
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, SpeedyGonsales. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, SpeedyGonsales. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)