Slasher600

Click here to leave me a new message, But please sign it with four ~'s at the end.

can i delete things off of my usertalk?

hey, and thanks for your answer to my question... Which i'm still wondering how you found my talk page anyways.. but my question is am i allowed to delete anything on my talk page or is it considered a "log" or "legal" matter...?Slasher600 05:51, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Well I found your talk page because you commented on another user's page that I watch regularly. You can delete pretty much anything you like, although removing warnings is a controversial matter (some see it as vandalism, some don't). — nathanrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 05:59, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

This was part of someone else's talk page that was Here

Battle of College Park

I've deleted it. Thanks for spotting this nonsense article and helping deal with it. Canderson7 ^(talk) 01:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Feel free to contact me anytime you need help. Canderson7 ^(talk) 02:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Alex Lynn

I've withdrawn my db. porges 01:22, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

subst:

That's a good question, the difference is an important one. A full explanation is located at Wikipedia:Template substitution. If you have further questions after reading that page, don't hesitate to ask away. Canderson7 ^(talk) 22:22, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome. Canderson7 ^(talk) 22:34, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Morley Bartnoff

I have reverted the removal of the tag. The article almost certainly qualifies under CSD A7, but I feel it is better to err on the side of don't-delete. You are right to be mindful of the 3RR, but it does not apply to vandalism and removing the prod tag from an article like this is vandalism. In the future, feel free to revert as many times as needed. Canderson7 ^(talk) 19:49, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

sorry

Hello I made a massive mistake thought I was editing my own bio on the practice page my name is Morley Bartnoff my user name is user:MogleyBe

I'm now carfully re reading the rules and regs

as a super newbee I had no ideo I had entered a beyond rough drat and then when i removed it to edit or delet I received your 2 notices

i hope this explains it all? Sorry for not understanding in advance Mb

Classical

I like the page man, though Jon told me that Zippin is indeed head of the Science Department. Obviously formating needs a bit of work, "Excurricular" is like 10,000 feet above the chart for it. BTW in case you're wondering who I am, I took your advice in Bio and made me an account (A. Howard) I wonder whether or not the Charts' background should be purple and the type color white instead of vice versa (ya know, like the school's color format) TheMadjester

Sorry about that..

I didn't intend to mess anything up, I'm a "rookie" so to say on wiki, just trying to add the stub things to pages, was hoping someone would add it.. but its my bad.. [[HappyHarvick2962

A co brother is your wife's sister's husband or the husband of your wife's sister.Co brothers are your wife's sisters' husbands or husbands of your wife's sisters. Explanation: Co brother or Co-brother is purely an Indian English (Indish) term to describe the husbands married to two or more sisters.Like in my case the eldest sister Shanthi Alberquerque is married to me that is Phillip David. The other sisters Sathi,Sheila and Susheela are married to Manu,Anil and Peter respectively.So each of the husbands that is Phillip,Manu,Anil and Peter are co brothers to each other.Example" Peter Rodrigues is Phillip David's co brother." This relationship is different from brother-in-law. In Indian languages each relationship has a specific term for example in Tamil( the language of the gods) elder sister is 'akka' and younger sister is 'thangi';elder brother is 'anna' and younger brother is'thambi' and so on.

Worst president ever

The article is currently on AfD, and I think that's the best solution. It attempts to discuss its subject neutrally (which means it cannot be considered vandalism), but is still not necessarily encyclopedic. It looks like the consensus will be to delete. Canderson7 ^(talk) 11:06, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Contirbution trees

I don't know the details, but I do know that the tool server based edit counters have been having technical difficulties lately. You're right that there is some sort of error in your case. You might want to request the details from User:Interiot, who runs that particular edit counter . Canderson7 ^(talk) 22:16, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome. Canderson7 ^(talk) 22:28, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Classical ranking stat

(As of the week of the 31st of April) Go to Newsweek.com. Click on the magazine icon in the upper left. Now click 1,000 to 1,100. At spot 1,056 you will see Classical HIgh School.Nathan128 23:10, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

dork

i got it from wikitionary 22:24, 4 May 2006 user:Numberoneconti

Classical

Sweet. Thanks for the good work!--SarekOfVulcan 19:04, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Reminder...

When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template.

Also, it should be noted that signing your posts with ~~~~ is a lot more effective than using {{User}}. Happy editing! — Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 03:08, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Who do I talk to in order to lock/revert an article?

Hi. Currently there is a Wikipedia article for the high school Marin Academy.

The problem I see with this article is that practically all of the information in unverifiable due to the lack of public resources that provide research on the institution.

As a faculty member at Marin Academy, I feel that it is my responsibility to fix this, as the majority of the content on the page is fictitious and even malicious.

I think the best course of action would be for the page to be wiped and only verifiable information to be allowed on it. Certainly some factual information there now would be lost, but in the long run I see this as the only way to continue Wikipedia's goal.

Thanks for your time. I contacted you since I noticed you dealt with the article after some blatant vandalism a while ago. -206.13.48.3 18:59, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Reply

I will reply to you both here and on your page, since you are an IP and i'm not sure of who you are. I strongly recommend that you get a user name.

Regarding Marin Academy, to fix the page, simply delete all unfactual information, and put in what is truthful and nessesary. Wikipedia is a wiki, which means the users decide what is credible and what is not. When you edit it, just put in the "edit summary" the nature of your edit. "revert vandalism," or "remove false information, please provide proof" would be another good one. I will keep an eye out for the page if you would like me to after you edit it. But remember, you must cite proof also as you do not want to come across as a hypocrite. If you delete alot of information, you may state it on the "talk page", and put your reasoning. Then, it will have to be contested if anyone argues with your changes. Although there has not been substantial vandalism on the page, you may list the page for protection at the Request for Protection Page. However, I'll be watching out for your page and if it is protected only registered users may edit it, as you are not logged in, you must register then.

Feel free to edit whatever you wish, or contact me with any more concerns, questions, or just to say hello.

Slasher600 03:18, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Re: NCSY

I've been away from my computer for awhile due to exams. Thanks for taking care of the NCSY page. Have you been part of the organization? Slasher600 03:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Nope, never. --Bachrach44 17:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Hey!

You don't know me, but my name is Dan Rozenson, and I've been a longtime member up at the club in Newton South. Good buddies with Maya, Dan Hazony, those folks. I hear your name come up sometimes, usually Maya going "Abi Berin's calling me!!!!". You know how it is.

I was interested to see who started the page here--I'd been too lazy to do anything. Will you be at the big party at BU Hillel on Sunday? Let's get in touch.

AIM: BronxBomberDude

Beth Sholom Synagogue

Sorry I'm responding so slowly, I meant to respond to your question earlier but it slipped my mind. Anyway, if you want to make a page for another Beth Sholom (and assuming its got some claim to notability), then call it Beth Sholom Synagogue (Toronto), move the current one to Beth Sholom Synagogue (Philadelphia), and make a disambig page in place of the old Beth Sholom Synagogue. If you need any help, let me know. --Bachrach44 16:26, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

School 1

Please do not create redirects to non-existent articles. (aeropagitica) 12:59, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Steven Burg

I've nominated Steven Burg, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Steven Burg satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Burg and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Steven Burg during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. IZAK 11:19, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

you've been to israel, fix it. and if you can, please fix the classical website.

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ncsynational.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ncsynational.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NCSYLOGO.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:NCSYLOGO.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Slasher600! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:19, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Slasher600,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Oral torah sc.gif

The file File:Oral torah sc.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Written torah.gif

The file File:Written torah.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 18 May 2019 (UTC)