User talk:SkyWarrior/Archive 1

THIS IS A TALK PAGE ARCHIVE Please do NOT edit this page. If you leave a message here, I will not respond to it. Click here to return to my active talk page

Welcome!

Hello, JudgeRM, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 21:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

My reversions

You're welcome. Have a great day. :-) --Ches (talk) (contribs) 19:45, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Nice work so far! GABHello! 20:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Drinks on me for catching the troll. Winterysteppe (talk) 16:16, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Dear JudgeRM

Hello, I am Snowbeast12345, and I have recently been talking on the deletion for the article, B.C. (2013 film). I have sent this message to make a point here, and I shall get to it.

I have heard many people complain of how the movie is not on DVD. However, due to it being a newer release, it may not have come to DVD yet. For example, the movie Piranhaconda, is on Amazon, but is only available in Region 2. It was released in 2012, one year before B.C., and it still not on DVD for Region 1. So, B.C. may only be on Region 2 for the current time. To back my information here is a link:

Piranhaconda on DVD Region 2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snowbeast12345 (talk • contribs) 18:23, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello Snowbeast12345, thank you for sharing. I would like to say that the reason as to why B.C. (2013 film) was deleted was not because there was no DVD release(s), but because it failed Wikipedia's notability guidelines on films. In the AfD, I have not actually seen any complaints about their not being a DVD release, so I can not, for Wikipedia's purposes, answer your question, unless I have already accidentally. JudgeRM 22:19, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Untitled

Sir I am very disappointed to see the wrong history of Noongar Cast .They have not belong to Julaha or Teli Cast. JULAHA and Tel I are a different Cast .Noongar are a kashatriya Rajput's of Sisodia Clan.They Called Noongar only Haryana and Punjab.These community belonged to Sisodia Rajput's of RAJASTHAN. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SUSHIL SISODIA (talk • contribs) 18:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi JudgeRM

Looks like you changed the spelling of my page title to reflect the page name. Since the page is about a person, this means their name is spelled incorrectly. Is there anyway to correct this? Thank you! Elisabethmiles (talk) 23:59, 8 June 2016 (UTC)ElisabethElisabethmiles (talk) 23:59, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello Elisabethmiles, really all that needs to be done is to move the page to capitalize the "A" in "D'Arcy", which I have done for you. JudgeRM 00:04, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

@JudgeRM: Thank you! Elisabethmiles (talk) 03:29, 9 June 2016 (UTC)ElisabethElisabethmiles (talk) 03:29, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Bayonne Bridge

Hello JudgeRM, I would like to happily inform you that The Bayonne Bridge is in fact Marred to Uday Schultz. There was an Official Priest present as well as consent from both parties. Although the Bayonne Bridge is an inanimate object, the owner of the bridge has officially given Uday Schultz the right to marry the Bridge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angus Jelinek (talk • contribs) 16:36, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Angus Jelinek, please provide a reliable source to confirm this claim. It will continue to be removed until such a source can be provided (my own research has yet to yield one). JudgeRM 16:39, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

My Wikipedia entry

Dear "Judge",

I edited my own page recently and removed the content because I do not want to be a part of Wikipedia. I would like the entire entry to be removed. It's my life, not yours, and I would like to keep it private. Please let me know how I can effect this. Mizrae (talk) 06:51, 16 June 2016 (UTC) Raechel Donahue

Mizrae, I have replied to you on your talk page. Please take a look and follow my advice. JudgeRM 16:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Black Jazz Records Copyright Violation & Slander & Mis-information

JudgeRM Im the owner of Black Jazz Records there is alot of Slander,Copyright Violation and Mis-information about my label ony Wikipedia. Its says im not the owner and has places and dates incorrect. If your not going to allow me to correct this information. Im asking you to remove my labels name and likeness from Wikipeda asap. Or I will have no choice to pursue a legal remedy...James Hardge C.E.O Black Jazz Records, [redacted] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.4.231 (talk) 18:54, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Brian Wells Death

Sorry, I am new to Wikipedia and I'm not very experienced. I was just watching one of my favorite shows and I got the idea to check out the person. I went down to the see more section and I saw 'List of unusual deaths', so I added the info. If you can, teach me how to add references so I can help out more.

From, PiGuy139 (talk) 18:24, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello PiGuy139. Adding references can be very simple. At the very basics, you can simply add the <ref></ref> tags in between your source. To put a reference from a website into an article, do the following:

<ref> [insert URL here] </ref>

That is the bare basics of it, really. Note that it can also be used for offline sources too, but since you're new, I think it's best that we stick with online sources for now. Furthermore, make sure the source you use is reliable; if it's not, the addition will be removed. If you would like to know more, see WP:REF. JudgeRM (talk to me) 19:01, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Dear JudgeRM,

Thank you for the information.PiGuy139 (talk) 19:17, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

External Links

Can I as the entry person, add links under External Links, found on a Google search of my name? Carol Smallwood (talk) 20:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Assuming you have a conflict of interest, Carol Smallwood, you are not supposed to edit the page at all. This would include adding external links. If you would like to propose changes to the article, including the addition of external links, please see Template:Request edit.

I would also advise you to see WP:EXTERNAL, specifically WP:ELNO, as some external links should not be listed at all, and I feel that the external links you want to list (and have previously listed) shouldn't be on the page in the first place. JudgeRM (talk to me) 21:19, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi JudgeRM. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 04:47, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Damn, that was fast. Thank you. JudgeRM (talk to me) 04:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

hello

this is about that russian chinese border wars 1969 this is the whole thing about that article i am just stating the facts so stop making lies about that article read this whole template On March 2, 1969, a group of Chinese troops ambushed Soviet border guards on Zhenbao Island. The Soviets suffered 59*dead, including a senior colonel, and 94*wounded. They retaliated on March 15 by bombarding Chinese troop concentrations on the Chinese bank of the Ussuri and by storming Zhenbao Island. The Soviets sent four then-secret T-62 tanks to attack the Chinese patrols on the island from the other side of the river. One of the leading tanks was hit and the tank commander was killed. On March 16, 1969, the Soviets entered the island to collect their dead, the Chinese held their fire. On March 17, 1969, the Soviets tried to recover the disabled tank, but their effort was repelled by the Chinese artillery. On March 21, the Soviets sent a demolition team attempting to destroy the tank. The Chinese opened fire and thwarted the Soviets. With the help of divers of the Chinese navy, the PLA pulled the T-62 tank onshore. The tank was later given to the Chinese Military Museum. On March 15, 1969, the Chinese troops were repelled from Zhenbao Island (Damansky Island) with significant losses and did not return until September of that year, when Soviet border guards received the order to not open fire against them.[2] and this I think when Kessler set the question he war referring to the armed conflict that occurred. In that case the soviet Union clearly prevailed. During the first storming of the island the Russians attacked the chinese in the flank and inflicted around 200 casualties. Later the Chinese returned, captured the island after meeting minimal soviet resistance. After this the Russian forces stormed the island with 4 t-62s and forced the chinese to withdraw. They then launched a large BM1-Grad bombardment which resulted in around 1000 chinese casualties after which the chinese withdrew. They made no further attempts to capture the Island and therefore the Russian forces could claim victory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dennis767 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello Dennis767. Your changes remove content that is properly and reliably sourced. Furthermore, what you add is not. The sources you have provided so far (from Wikia and a forum) are not reliable sources and cannot be used to support the claim. I would suggest you discuss such controversial changes on the talk page before editing the page any further. Thank you. JudgeRM (talk to me) 17:31, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

do not be unfair too

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Inm4fOr36xs this is a youtube video see this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Di9RJPNQduM and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zscg9GVJ1j0 it was a clear russian victory — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dennis767 (talk • contribs) 17:37, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Dennis767, YouTube is not a reliable source and cannot be used to support your claim. Please see WP:RS for more information on what a reliable source is. Furthermore, please sign your comments with ~~~~. Thank you. JudgeRM (talk to me) 17:40, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Be careful of WP:3RR please. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Noted. JudgeRM (talk to me) 17:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Sartorius (3rd nomination)

Hi JudgeRM. You closed this discussion as "speedy keep". May I ask which one of the speedy keep criteria you closed it as this under? Omni Flames (talk) 09:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Omni Flames, I closed the discussion as a speedy keep simply because all the other votes were speedy keep. I am fully aware of WP:SKCRIT; with that said, I am willing to change the vote to a regular keep (or even a SNOW keep), if requested. JudgeRM (talk to me) 17:02, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Ah, okay, that makes sense, thanks for explaining. Perhaps a SNOW keep would've been better, but then again, that's really just process for the sake of process. Omni Flames (talk) 21:59, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

No problem. I'm probably just going to leave it as is tbh; I could change it to a SNOW, but it really is just process, and likely wouldn't make a difference in the long run. JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:02, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

August 3

hi there friend. I am not supporting its inclusion, I was simply tidying it up, if you think its unwarranted there please feel free to remove, ta Govindaharihari (talk) 15:18, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Understandable, Govindaharihari. I'm going to remove it, though if it is re-added I'll likely bring it up to the talk page instead of re-reverting. JudgeRM (talk to me) 15:21, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Cool, thanks, best regards 15:44, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Trumball County, Ohio

@judgerm i was including articles and the videos from the tv episodes where this has aired for the trumbull county distrubance could you please get bacl to me how you notfied me before live in warren ohio which is in trumbull county ohio and i feel the ppl hear need to know about one of the biggest events here i was including every article etc on it i worked and was working hard on doing this article for my county — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vampireking1988 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Vampireking1988, please provide a reliable source about these events. You have not provided such (a YouTube video is not a reliable source, by the way). Therefore, it cannot be added to the article until you provide reliable sources. Furthermore, please sign your posts with ~~~~. Thank you. JudgeRM (talk to me) 18:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

@JudgeRm sorry im still actually new to this the idea of letting the ppl know around me popped into my head when i found my county has a wiki lol i have no idea half of the stuff im supposed to do i thuought i was signed in what would be a reliable source if i found a newspaper article etc i have them saved to my computer is just wont let me or i dont know how to upload the image driectly into the article i could probably have my frind help me at a later time to do all of this ill try and watch the tutorial i cant find it it ty i dont mean to be a pest i just dont know how to do alot of this stuff and wouldnt the episodes from the shows like paranormal witness etc sovice as well so i can add them or when i figure out the reffrence thing can i add the links as well so ppl can hear the 911 call etc i know the lady roy ann but i doubt shed want to make a inteview after all the media attention and what not how do i upload a image becuase i could write the article again i got it off the site for this becuase as you see i suck at typing lol but what would be conidered a reliable source — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vampireking1988 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

What is considered a reliable source can be found here. Newspapers like The Plain Dealer are reliable sources. This can help you locate reliable sources. Also please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~). JudgeRM (talk to me) 18:36, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

@judgerm sorry about that i got messed up and accidently added the stupid sources to the list instead of the article :( Vampireking1988 (talk) 19:10, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

@judgerm i think i got it i hope ty so much for your help your a cool dude :) im sorry i was a pest again i really do ty (Vampireking1988 (talk))

Vampireking1988 It's fine. Glad I was able to help. By the way, add your signature (with ~~~~) at the end of your posts, not the beginning. JudgeRM (talk to me) 23:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

the tumbull county disturbance article

hi i was trying to get all the info together i live in trumbull county ohio and i wanted to make this part of the page i have various newspaper articles etc and episodes from the shows this has aired on is there any way you can get back to me on this asap the way you got ahold of me before i thought that owuld have been enough reffrence with all the stuff i had shows etc that its aired on syfy and stuff i was going to include the ufo hunters episdoe this is one of the biggest things thats ever happned in this county and i really want ppl to know it could happen again to keep watch — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vampireking1988 (talk • contribs) 18:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Vampireking1988, please see what I have written above. JudgeRM (talk to me) 18:25, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacGyver the Lizard

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacGyver the Lizard . Lizzymartin (talk) 06:56, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

• @JudgeRM: Please see above. Lizzymartin (talk) 03:49, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Brentwood edit

My edit to the Brentwood Wikipedia page is accurate. Brentwood is very well known for being particularly affluent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:C207:1D00:74ED:C174:1D33:1DF0 (talk) 19:14, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

I do understand, however stating it as such is not a neutral point of view. Please see WP:NPOV for more details. JudgeRM (talk to me) 19:16, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Deletion review for MacroGeo

An editor has asked for a deletion review of MacroGeo. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 05:10, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Untitled II

I am creating this page to accomplish my homework. Am I violating any rule? If so, please let me know. As it shows some problem, I might change the name to PGCert Learning Tools — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohammad.farazi (talk • contribs) 22:05, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Mohammad.farazi, to put it bluntly, it does: WP:NOTMANUAL, specifically points 1 and 6. You also fail to provide any reliable sources, which is required.

Also, sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). JudgeRM (talk to me) 22:10, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Untitled III

Don't delete it, come on besides It's almost 2017 - From, CMSabresFan — Preceding unsigned comment added by CMSabresFan (talk • contribs) 03:14, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

hello, CMSambresFan. I nominated the page for speedy deletion because, well, there's nothing on it. Besides, it's too soon to create an article about 2017 events (you can't wait two months, can you?). Unless you add suffice content to the page (see pages like 2016 in amusement parks), it will be deleted. If you do add suffice content, however, I would suggest you move the page into the draft space until 2017. JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:23, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Hawaii Five-O#Requested move 10 November 2016

Can you undo the closure and the relist the discussion? The consensus is inadequate. A few supported the disambiguation but split. The opposers... how are they more convincing than the supports? --George Ho (talk) 22:36, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, George Ho. I looked over the discussion, and still agree with my close. Since I don't revert closes unless it was against policy (and this wasn't in my eyes), I will not be reverting the close. I suggest you open a discussion at move review and discuss it there. JudgeRM (talk to me) 00:53, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

In other words, opposers had stronger arguments than supporters? --George Ho (talk) 01:03, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

If neither side made a stronger argument than the other, can you revise the closure rationale to "no consensus" per WP:RMCI#Three possible outcomes? --George Ho (talk) 01:06, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I'll revise it (I'll admit a no consensus appears better). If you still disagree, move review is always an option). JudgeRM (talk to me) 01:20, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Untitled IV

--Deep4012 (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Jana Hart--Deep4012 (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Freshslice Pizza- terminated employee posts

A terminated employee who we have a supreme court case pending with charges of slander, libel and extortion has posted on this page. We suspect it was this individual because we have traced the IP to his home town. I have removed the items in question a few times but they keep reappearing. As this is a pending legal case I ask that you do not repost. Also can you tell me how we can lock this site from that individual? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mctom54 (talk • contribs) 03:19, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Mctom54. The content you keep removing is properly sourced by reliable sources; it is advised that you not remove them without discussing them first on the talk page. Despite that, I will not revert your removal, though if another user does, then oh well. If you do believe the content is truly libelous, then please feel free to email Wikipedia at info-en-q@wikipedia.org

As for the user, we cannot lock the entire site from the entire user. We could block them, but that won't do much if they are an IP. You could also request for the page to be protected (that means only certain users can edit the page) here, though I don't think you'll succeed in that.

And lastly, please read the following pages: WP:COI and WP:NLT, just so you know these exist (especially the former). And sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~). JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:47, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JudgeRM. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Untitled V

Hi my name is Alex, and have the maps original of Samanco district Peru . Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fusion1961 (talk • contribs) 20:49, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

B

I looked up on the letter frequency page and ot said that B is used more often than V, K, J, X, Q, and Z. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IggyKoopa408 (talk • contribs) 03:53, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, IggyKoopa408. Please provide a reliable source that supports that claim; the info cannot be added to the page by your word alone. Furthermore, sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~). Thank you. JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:55, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Monopoly section blanking

It was one thing for you to blank the section. Please see WP:NOBLANKING But after I undid your edit, and requested that you bring it to TP, I don't understand why you went ahead and blanked it again without discussion.TeeVeeed (talk) 15:22, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, TeeVeeed. I'll first start out by saying that WP:NOBLANKING is an essay, not a guideline or policy. Furthermore, there are exceptions to removal, one of which is that the content is WP:UNDUE, or that the content represents a minority viewpoint (see WP:WONTWORK, which is policy), which I personally believe the content is so. I will explain in more detail later, I have things to do. In the meantime, I would also suggest getting some more opinions on the matter from editors other than me; I see that you have already began, and I do apologize for not discussing it more. JudgeRM (talk to me) 15:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

I agree to wait for further discussion, thank you. TeeVeeed (talk) 17:01, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Closing a discussion

Hello! Could you consider closing a page move discussion on Talk:Chairman of Committees (House of Lords)#Requested move 11 November 2016? --Editor FIN (talk) 17:11, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I'll consider it. Let me look over it (and ask a few questions over on IRC) though. JudgeRM (talk to me) 20:46, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

 Done, closed as move. Thanks for making me aware of the discussion, Editor FIN. JudgeRM (talk to me) 20:53, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

mistakenly left info on wrong page

Hi I didn't realize that wasn't a page to set up an article until I had already saved it. I didn't write it on purpose to create a problem. My apologies.I hope I am answering you in the correct way as I didn't mean to do anything wrong.

Vernell HackettVhackett (talk) 03:56, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

I see. We all make mistakes, right? Well thanks for letting me know (and yes, this is the correct way to answer me). JudgeRM (talk to me) 11:47, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

AFD

Edits shouldn't be made to AFDs once closed if they're substantial changes - I've simply changed one word because "IMHO the article needs expanding not deleted" makes no sense whereas "IMHO the article needs expanding not deleting" does make sense,
A minor spelling error is not something you should be reverting but anyway If you disagree with the fact I've corrected a spelling post-afd-close then drag me to ANI otherwise I would suggest you move on,
Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 12:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

K. JudgeRM (talk to me) 12:46, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Spelling fixes

Hey Judge,

so I went ahead and fixed a page for it's spelling mistakes (eSports -> Esports) and you revert my changes. I understand that the person who made the article likely doesn't speak English for their first language, but it's a well known fact that names and words within this context maintain the capital letter at the beginning of the word - not in random places.

Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nazrinhedgensucks (talk • contribs) 17:54, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello Nazrinhedgensucks. What you did is not a spelling mistake; "eSports" is spelled with a lowercase "e"; therefore, you should not change it. JudgeRM (talk to me) 23:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Hey Judge,

Clearly English isn't your first language, so as you might not already know, words don't have random captial letters within them.

I understand this could be a hard concept for you to understand, but that's the English language for you.

Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nazrinhedgensucks (talk • contribs) 23:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello Nazrinhedgensucks. Please see WP:NPA; I only know English, so your claim that English isn't my first language is false.

In regards to the actual comment, some words, such as eSports, do have the first letter lowercase, like iPhone.

Also, sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). JudgeRM (talk to me) 23:09, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Hey Judge,

still seems like you having a hard time to grab the concept.

"iPhone" is a brand name, a term created by a company meaning they have control over things such as capitialisation.

However Esports doesn't follow such ruling, as it's simply a word and not a company-created brand name.

Thank you for your time. Nazrinhedgensucks (talk) 23:11, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello Nazrinhedgensucks. Reliable sources say that "eSports" is correct. If you disagree with me, please bring it up onto the talk page instead of reverting me. JudgeRM (talk to me) 23:19, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Please also see Talk:eSports/Archive 1#Article title revisited (22 December 2015), where there is consensus to use "eSports". JudgeRM (talk to me) 23:21, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Hey Judge,

thanks for the links you provided. I guess using the term "eSports", while wrong, is more generally accepted.

I apologize for any misconceptions, as I saw the obvious mistake without realizing how the term is used and accepted, and I thought I was making an actual contribution.

Thank you for your time.

Nazrinhedgensucks (talk) 23:25, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome. I probably should've linked to that discussion in my first message, but oh well. JudgeRM (talk to me) 23:26, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Untitled VI

Well If You Use Unresponsive Editing Which Minds Me Of Blocking User. You May Be Blocked :/ Good Luck Surviving

oh well — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:586:4b00:bf80:ed39:832b:518a:e180 (talk • contribs) 22:09 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Please note that I have placed Breitbart News under a 1RR and other sanctions - please see the template at Talk:Breitbart News for more information. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 05:35, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gregory kirchhoff

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gregory kirchhoff, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Waggie (talk) 20:31, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Waggie, you placed the speedy on the redirect, not the actual article. I've removed it, though if the actual article is speedied then you can re-add it. JudgeRM (talk to me) 20:34, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

It wasn't a redirect when I went to CSD it, if you look at the page history, you moved the page and created the redirect seconds before I CSD'd it. Waggie (talk) 20:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Huh, it appears you're right. Turns out it was just some simultaneous editing at work. Sorry 'bout that. JudgeRM (talk to me) 21:59, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

S'chn T'gai Spock

Why did you revert my edit? As I explained in the edit summary, Spock's full name was revealed in the novel Ishmael. How is that not constructive? --110.174.166.224 (talk) 03:18, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm using Huggle, I can't see the edit summaries. I have reverted the edit. Sorry. JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Actually, after looking over it, the more I agree with my initial revert. Technically, it wasn't sourced. You got to provide reliable sources supporting your claim; just saying "it was revealed in novel x" isn't enough. JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Are you saying that the novel is not a reliable source or are you saying that I should've included a citation for the novel in article? -110.174.166.224 (talk) 03:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

The latter. I don't doubt the reliability of the novel, you just gotta provide a citation for it.

With that said, even if a citation is added, I will not be responsible for any reversions of your edit by another user. JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:38, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Untitled VII

not trying to be rude but i was trying to tell the truth — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polinka123 (talk • contribs) 08:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

I had to look at your edits to figure out what you were talking about; I'm assuming you're the IP from above? In any case, please don't make edits like that again. JudgeRM (talk to me) 19:40, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop reverting my edit

not trying to be rude but pls its true thats a real country and a real party kthx bye 112.198.76.55 (talk) 08:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Reversal of addition

I dont understand the reversal. I am Russell Jackson. I was a member of the Mississippi State University football team from 2005 through 2007 after which I tranfered to Jacksonville State University and play there from 2008 through 2010. Jsu1454n Jsu1454n (talk) 03:56, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello Jsu1454n. I do apologize for the reversion; I don't remember actually reverting it, and I don't usually revert edits to tables (unless it's blatant vandalism, which this does not appear to be). I have reverted my reversion, to leave for someone else.

In the meantime, read WP:COI. JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:59, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Please stop reverting edits to the talk page regarding the career of Hattie Jacques. It is a perfectly acceptable contribution in response to the bullying the editor has undergone. You have no right to remove it from the talk page. None. You will be blocked from editing without further warning should you continue this bullying. 4.15.125.35 (talk) 03:37, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Please see WP:NPA. Personal attacks are not allowed, and your comments clearly constitute one. JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:38, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

The editor in question has been subjected to numerous personal attacks and humiliations today and you've done nothing. One user even deleted a complaint they opened to try and get help. If you are such a stickler for protocol, I suggest you take a look at all the users involved and issue the same threats to all of them. I posted a message of support on their talk page that you have no right to remove. They can remove it if they choose. Its their talk page. Not yours.4.15.125.35 (talk) 03:40, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

No. Blatant personal attacks can be removed from anyone, and your comments still constitute as personal attacks. Please refrain from making such comments before you are blocked. JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:41, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Then you need to block Cassianto to and all their various aliases. They deleted an open complaint. 4.15.125.35 (talk) 03:44, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

I cannot block anyone, for I am not an administrator. Contact one and try to convince them. JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:45, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for having to leave you to see this persistent one through. I was out for a while. Meters (talk) 05:07, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

It's alright. This was a difficult one to deal with, I'll admit, especially considering how long it took to block. But I was able to handle it, no problems. If I don't mind asking, Meters, you know the history behind this IP, because it's clear that this IP isn't new. JudgeRM (talk to me) 05:16, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Sorry I don't know, but I've been wondering that too. Clearly someone who has a past history with certain admins. More of the same ranting and attacks by this IP from a year ago here. This edit summary by the talk page's owner (75.25.138.60) shortly afterwards bears a striking resemblance to some of the recent edits by 72.245.246.219 (for example [1] ) just before 4.15.125.35 started up. A bit of a coincidence that all three of those IPs geolocate to within a few miles of each other... Meters (talk) 05:50, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Hm, interesting. Given the behavior and the geolocation, I wouldn't be surprised if the IPs are the same person. Well thanks for the info. JudgeRM (talk to me) 11:30, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

TalkBack

Hello, SkyWarrior. You have new messages at NecrosisBuddha's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for reverting all that vandalism on my talk page. —MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome. (I hope you don't mind, but I also stoleborrowed your semi-protection notice for my own talk. If you do mind, then you can remove it). JudgeRM (talk to me) 20:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

~~~ Merry Christmas! ~~~

Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!

Hello, JudgeRM! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia!
Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Linguist If you reply to me here, please add {{ping|Linguist111}} to the start of your message 20:59, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}

Pornography in Judaism

Just saw your comment to my edits. I am new to editing wikis, so please be patient with my methods while I learn.

The original entry cited an article written by myself, providing a very misleading paraphrase of its contents. I was alerted to this by my readers, at least one of whom trusted the paraphrase and acted accordingly. So I corrected the misleading sentence.

The original entry stated explicitly that there is no prohibition in Judaism against pornography. I provided the most authoritative sources there are stating explicitly otherwise.

Both my edits were almost immediately reverted. I deleted the entry, temporarily, so as not to mislead readers, while I could compose a more thorough entry. Perhaps this was rash.

At present—at least for the moment—we have a collaborative effort with information provided that is not incorrect. But it is quite obvious that someone is editing with an agenda, and purposely misinforming the public. I am only doing what I can to correct that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flange the Flee (talk • contribs) 02:47, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello Flange the Flee. How you handled the situation with this edit summary is not how we do things here on Wikipedia; just because you were reverted for removing something is not an excuse to remove all mentions of the topic.

You were reverted for removing sourced content without explaining why, especially with this edit. You need to explain your removals, either with an edit summary or on the talk. If the content is removed again, then don't remove it again; instead, discuss it on the talk page and get consensus for it. JudgeRM (talk to me) 02:56, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Cumbernauld

User and edits already reported to Oversight. Meters (talk) 18:55, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Alright thanks for letting me know. Was about to go do it myself. The editor's been blocked, now we just gotta wait for the edits to be removed. JudgeRM (talk to me) 18:57, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

I figured everyone who say that was going ot be going to Oversight at the same time. Meters (talk) 18:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Fair point (though it doesn't hurt to have multiple people report the same thing to Oversight, especially in a clear cut case such as this). Well, thanks again. JudgeRM (talk to me) 19:01, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Untitled VIII

Oh I'm sorry I was just messing with a friend she I edited Demopolis Alabama's page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul6512 (talk • contribs) 03:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Alright, Paul6512, I'm going to assume good faith and let this slide. But don't do it again or you'll risk getting blocked. JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:29, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Mother Teresa

Dear sir I see that the article Mother Teresa is a saint but on its talk page it has no saint portal or Christianity mark do assist me for the same as it is listed on the project page but not on article talkpage --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 03:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello Tiven2240. I apologize if I misunderstood your request, and feel free to correct me if I did.

If you click on the [Show] button where the words "This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details." appear, it will show a list of WikiProjects the article belongs to; the Mother Teresa article is in both the Christianity and the Saints WikiProjects. Clicking [Show] on the Christianity WikiProject will also show that the two portals you are requesting to be added are, in fact, already on the talk page. I hope this helped. JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the same but I see it is B-class how can it be A because I wanted it to be nominated for FA and I wanted to regrade the article --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 03:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello Tiven2240. You should first start by working the page up to GA status. I see that you have already requested a GA assessment. That's the first step; someone will then assess the article and, if they think it qualifies, will promote it to GA status. If it fails, then they will provide tips on how to get the page to GA status. JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for assisting me --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 03:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome. If you need any more assistance, feel free to message me again. JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Untitled IX

Dear JudgeRM,

In retrospect, I got carried away in trying to delete paragraphs, so I sincerely apologize for that.

However, I fail to see why I would be prevented from trying to add a paragraph, which is all that I attempted on my most recent edit. The rule against vandalism specifically refers to wanton deletion, not an earnest attempt to add a serious paragraph.

Again, I'm sorry in general, but I beg you to reconsider on the one, specific point

Sincerely, Darwin Dynasty Darwin Dynasty (talk) 04:10, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello Darwin Dynasty. Your addition was reverted because you failed to provide reliable sources supporting it. All additions to the page must be properly sourced, and if it's not, then it must be removed. I will say that lead additions don't need sources, as long as the info is already sourced later in the article; however, since your addition was not in the article at all beforehand, this doesn't apply. JudgeRM (talk to me) 04:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for Yago Roche

Hello, I have read your message on my page about the "speedy delete" of the page Yago Roche that has been this:

I have contested the speedy deletion. I can not, however, do anything if it goes to article for deletion, and will not do anything if it is prodded or speeded with different criteria. JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

I wanted to thank you from my heart that thanks to you they have not erased the page, I do not really understand the reason why they sent the deletion of the page but thanks to you is still active, thank you very much. If you need anything, let me know. And Merry Christmas.

--ShayminCat (talk) 03:15, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome, ShayminCat. I will still say this; your page is not completely safe from deletion; for now, it is, but someone else may come along and send it to AfD or PROD it. Until then, however, it is safe. I do suggest you keep working on the article to prevent deletion. If you want, I can move it to a subpage of your user page so you could work on it outside of the mainspace.

And Merry Christmas to you, too. JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

And what should I do? --ShayminCat (talk) 20:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

ShayminCat, there are many things that you could do to improve the quality of your articles. Even though you have made a few articles, I would recommend you look over WP:YFA. You should also look over WP:N, WP:NOT, and WP:RS, among other pages that are linked in those articles.

I would also suggest that, instead of putting a page straight into the mainspace, you should instead put it into draft space. That way, users can provide feedback on what can be fixed before it can go into mainspace (if you wish, I can move your current mainspace articles into draft space for you). Note that this is not required, just a little suggestion, and you don't have to go to draft space if you want. JudgeRM (talk to me) 21:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

French Paradox

Hi JudgeRM

You say you took down my edit because it wasn't constructive (OED: Helpful, Positive). I can see that it didn't agree with that section of the article, and was probably at worst antagonistic, but if the information in the article is wrong, in fact misleading, then in the interests of keeping Wikipedia correct, surely corrections - with supporting references - should be allowed. After all, Wikipedia has come to be considered the de-facto supplier of factual truth the world over. So in the interest of truth and fact Wikipedia has a corrections function, and thankfully arbiters to ensure those corrections are feasible.

So allowing statements that are patently untrue to continue when they can be corrected, in fact taking down the correction in favour of the lie is surely rather Orwellian. Double ungood, even.

I did not remove the offending section I was countering as the whole point of it was to emphasise the apparent French Paradox, but, in pointing out the errors in the facts used to partly justify the article, I then cast doubt on the veracity of the rest of the article into question. Maybe the originator of the post would have been stung enough to verify their own facts and re-consider their text. I don't know, the whole article is an opinion. The French Paradox is just that, an opinion. But to attempt to support the opinion with incorrect data is just wrong.

I understand that I wasn't too subtle in my method, but I feel that when searching for a fact, one should not have to second guess the answer. You should be able to take it as truthful and accurate. Wikipedia purports to be an encyclopedia, not a novel, or an op-ed! It should deal in verifiable fact.

Fact and Opinion are not the same. I have stated that in my opinion the article was wrong. and I have given a verifiable fact to support that opinion. I have also given a correction in the form of the facts as supplied by official figures, and I believe that I also gave a link to the source of those figures.

So, after all this high-horsed justification, would you please let me know how I could have corrected this article without being frowned upon. ;-)

Yours

David Whatley-Holmes

David Whatley-Holmes (talk) 10:34, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello David Whatley-Holmes. After looking over your edit again, I did in fact found that it did not appear to be vandalism as I had originally thought. With that said, the removal is justified by other policies and guidelines. For starters, your edit appears to be original research, which is strictly prohibited on Wikipedia. Your edit also didn't appear to be in a neutral point of view, which all edits must be. Furthermore, you have to prove your edit is a French paradox with a reliable source; your edit didn't appear to do that, and the source you did give made no mention of a French paradox.

Do not state flat out that the article is wrong in the article itself. Instead, leave a message on the talk page explaining why the article is wrong, and in that, leave suggestions on how it could be fixed. JudgeRM (talk to me) 16:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Cheng Xiao Wikipedia Page

Hello!

I wanted to create a Cheng Xiao wikipedia page as a solo, instead of being redirected to her group, Cosmic Girls, but now it is undone. Am I not allowed to create an individual artist page? Wjsn0225 (talk) 03:23, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello Wjsn0225. It's not banned to start an individual article from a redirect, but the individual article must meet WP:N and WP:GNG or else it will be reverted back to a redirect. You must provide reliable sources assuring us that Cheng Xiao meets GNG. Before you start, can you prove that Cheng Xiao is notable enough for their own article? JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:25, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Cheng Xiao rose to fame in Korea over a holiday period called Chuseok, where she performed a rhythmic gymnastic routine on an idol athletic show called ISAC. After trending for that, she received a lot of love from CF (commercial film) companies, as well as many many variety shows. She models for many companies now such as Welli Helli Snowpark, Nexon Sudden Attack and KT Olleh, with her KT ClIp CF video as well as photo modelling. These are only 3 out of many companies that she models for now, as well as her modelling gigs with popular magazines such as Cosmopolitan.. With variety shows, she's appeared on many famous Korean shows such as Happy Together, My Little Television, and is a fixed cast on the show Law of the Jungle for this season with other famous celebrities.. I've checked many other individual member wiki pages such as the members of APink who have even less individual gigs than Cheng Xiao, and Cheng Xiao is only a rookie right now in the K-pop industry. The individual page will be easier to keep track of all she is doing, as Cosmic Girls have 12 members in total and only small profiles, an extended page would be very necessary considering how big she is now. Thank you. Wjsn0225 (talk) 04:08, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

References

Thanks for this Wjsn0025. I'll look over this in the morning, and give you feedback then. JudgeRM (talk to me) 04:48, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Alright, Wjsn0025, here's what I think of that. I'm unsure about the reliability of the sources provided, but they look reliable (except the YouTube link, which appears to be a primary source and thus cannot be used to show notability). I would suggest starting a draft article (I can assist you in doing this if you want), so I can see what the article would look like, and for you to get feedback from other editors before it goes into the mainspace. JudgeRM (talk to me) 18:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Okay!! Thank you, will do after the holiday period, merry christmas. :) Wjsn0225 (talk) 00:49, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Alright. I'm here if you need any assistance. And merry Christmas to you, too. JudgeRM's public acct. (talk) 01:02, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Season's Greetings!

We wish you a Merry Christmas,

We wish you a Merry Christmas,

We wish you a Merry Christmas,

And a Happy New Year!

May your holidays be filled with peace and joy. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Altamel (talk) 06:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Adapted from {{Xmas6}}. Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:User:Altamel/Christmas}} to their talk page.

Thanks for all your help fighting vandalism. Best, Altamel (talk) 06:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Kowitz Edited page

Thanks for the feedback!

I made the following adjustments... I removed "terrific defensively, amazing at the plate"

Nevertheless, the statistic is a FACT and was trying to offer "neutral point of view" by anyone's standard.

How do you offer commentary on an ACCOMPLISHMENT?

"Brian had a 37 game hitting streak which was the 2nd longest in Clemson University's history".

This is amazing.

Certainly NOT "Promotional in nature"

Thanks again!

Vacuum5 (talk) 21:10, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome, that looks a whole lot better and neutral. JudgeRM's public acct. (talk) 21:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Page mover granted

Hello, JudgeRM. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

• Wikipedia:Requested moves
• Category:Articles to be moved, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, post here, or just let me know. Thank you, and happy editing! — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 03:50, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, Coffee. JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:51, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Westworld

Thank you for closing the RM at Westworld. Please do remember to clean up the disambiguation page and hat notes, and to handle the incoming links. It looks like there are still very many that are mis-linked. Thanks,--Cúchullain ^t/c 17:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Oh, did I forget some things? I do apologize, I will look and fix those things soon. JudgeRM (talk to me) 17:08, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Alright, Cuchullain, I think I corrected the links. Thanks for making me aware of this. JudgeRM (talk to me) 18:01, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Need to change the name of Subbarow to SubbaRao

Hi There,

i was trying to change the name of Yellapragada Subbarow to the Correct one "Yellapragada SubbaRao". Request you to make the changes as the name already mentioned is wrong one.

Thanks. Siva Varanasi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.72.144.54 (talk) 18:57, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

The article is at Yellapragada Subbarow; therefore, unless the article is moved (and if you want it moved, please start an RM discussion; I will not do it myself unless you give me a good reason to), it will stay at Subbarow. JudgeRM (talk to me) 19:01, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi JudgeRM,

First of all the name itself is wrong which was mentioned. you can change the name as "Yellapragada Subbarao". Also can you please let me know your country of origin ( Do not mistake Me). In India the names mean a lot and and as the article relates to a renowned scientist. request you to make the changes immediatly.

Thanks. Siva Varnasi.

Hello. I will reply to your comment like this: for starters, I am from the United States. And second, please read what I have written above. JudgeRM (talk to me) 19:16, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Rather than needlessly edit warring...

...why not just answer the anon IPs question and let it go? Edit warring over something that stupid is stupid. And, just for the record, you were edit warring, too and could be sent to AN3 just as he can. You'd be wise to let this go. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 21:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Winkelvi, it was a blatant violation of WP:TALK, and therefore had no place on the talk. The IP was blocked for doing something similar back in 2014. Furthermore, judging from their contributions, I'm convinced they're only here to disrupt. JudgeRM (talk to me) 21:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

IP's been blocked for disruptive editing. By the way, Winkelvi, I still stand by my original actions. JudgeRM (talk to me) 21:43, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

You led him there by angering him and just removing what he wrote rather than responding. Your actions were wrong and you were edit warring (still are). What you were (and are still) doing is disruptive and completely unnecessary. You should have also been blocked, in my opinion. Knock it off and please read both WP:BITE and WP:POKE. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 22:08, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

For starters, given 2014 edits like this, I'm led to believe that this IP is the same user from 2014. Second, after the whole fiasco, the IP went ahead and reverted edits by ATS without explanation, likely in retaliation to this fiasco. It's clear that this user is only here to cause disruption. And third, I'm not edit-warring, and if I was, I stopped. Off-topic discussion can be removed per WP:NOTFORUM and WP:TALK. I still stand by my actions, regardless of what you have said. JudgeRM (talk to me) 22:37, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Furthermore, Winkelvi, in response to this, I present you with this; I know what I meant by archiving. And if you really want me blocked, then feel free to go to WP:ANI or something. JudgeRM (talk to me) 23:40, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

I don't want you blocked, I want you to stop being unnecessarily bitey and rude to a newbie. All he did was ask a couple of questions. You were in the wrong, you were disruptive, and you didn't need to be any of that. I have no desire to see you blocked, maybe just learn from this? -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 23:45, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Alright, Winkelvi, I'll back away from this. I'll learn from this instead of trying to defend myself even further. JudgeRM (talk to me) 23:46, 27 December 2016 (UTC)