User talk:SiliconProphet/Archives/2021/October

Speedy deletion nomination of Yaacob I ben Aaharon ben Shalma

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Yaacob I ben Aaharon ben Shalma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elazar IX. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Amram VIII ben Shalma

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Amram VIII ben Shalma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elazar IX. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Epistles has been accepted

The Epistles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 09:43, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stromer von Reichenbach (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stromer von Reichenbach and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stromer von Reichenbach, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 18:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, SiliconProphet! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! scope_creepTalk 18:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Stromer von Reichenbach has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stromer von Reichenbach. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 18:16, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Great Song to Mani (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:The Great Song to Mani may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pax Verbum 06:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Edit on Seiunji Temple

Hello, @SiliconProphet:! Now you can edit to Seiunji Temple. Thanks! ---Limited Idea4me (talk) 22:35, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sermon on Mani's Teaching of Salvation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mani.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Unreferenced articles

Hey I have been noticing you creating tons of articles on Japanese mythology. Good job translating all that but, do be careful with translating unreferenced articles. It being unreferenced does increase the chances of it being deleted.

Also at times it can come off as being disruptive.CycoMa (talk) 01:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

I think I see what the issue is. The automatic translation system was deleting the Japanese-language references due to a conflict in reference format between English and Japanese, I will fix the references in the next day or two SiliconProphet (talk) 01:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Content Translation

When you're working with CX, be aware that it can leave cruft lying around (because it's not very smart). You should try to remove it while you're working on the page. Izno (talk) 02:12, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nakatsuhime-no-Mikoto

The article Nakatsuhime-no-Mikoto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ––FormalDude talk 03:51, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Great Song to Mani

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:The Great Song to Mani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://newbuddhist.com/discussion/17144/the-great-song-to-mani. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hayleez (talk) 18:11, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ame-no-Kaguyama-no-Mikoto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Onuma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Kushimichi no Mikoto moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kushimichi no Mikoto, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 12:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Ainu Culture moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ainu Culture, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 03:37, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Kisumimi

Hello SiliconProphet. Sorry but I've moved you article to draftspace. The references are unverifiable as they haven't been translated, inturn causing the article to have many citation errors. If you get the translation done ping me and I'll help to get any over issue fixed up. Thanks ActivelyDisinterested (talk) 15:15, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Saint Paraskeva-Pyanitsa.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Saint Paraskeva-Pyanitsa.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:45, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Nakatsuhime-no-Mikoto moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nakatsuhime-no-Mikoto, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 01:31, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Saint Paraskeva-Pyanitsa.jpg

The file File:Saint Paraskeva-Pyanitsa.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Святая Параскева-Пятница.jpg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 14:32, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Star Game (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Star Game may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

---✨LazyManiik✨ 13:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Folk Orthodoxy

added a link pointing to Commemoration

Himetataraisuzu-hime

added a link pointing to Jinmu

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Yosotarashi-hime moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yosotarashi-hime, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:53, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Lower mythology

I see that you are still working on the brand-new article Lower mythology, but I did a few quick fixes. The article will need quite a bit more cleanup, and it would be great if you would take care of that. In particular, you've got a mess in the citations that needs sorting out, and punctuation always goes before the citation. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 00:17, 31 October 2021 (UTC)