User talk:Robomaeyhem/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Archive 1: March 2006 - July 2006

Welcome!

Welcome to the Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject! I see you are just getting started in helping with tropical cyclone articles, and us at the project are happy you joined. There are numerous ongoing projects, including greatly improving the retired hurricane/typhoon articles or finishing a database encompassing tropical cyclone seasons in every basin. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me or at our headquarters. Have fun, and see you around.

Thanks, I just started watching Hurricanes in 2005, so I'm still kind of new to it

That's cool. There's always room to learn, so any little way you can help would help the project as a whole. Hurricanehink 15:03, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:2005atl.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:2005atl.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 12:26, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Article formatting

Dear Tropical cyclone editor,

As a member of the Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject, you are receiving this message to describe how you can better tropical cyclone articles. There are hundreds of tropical cyclone articles, though many of them are poorly organized and lacking in information. Using the existing featured articles as a guide line, here is the basic format for the ideal tropical cyclone article.

1. Infobox- Whenever possible, the infobox should have a picture for the tropical cyclone. The picture can be any uploaded picture about the storm, though ideally it should be a satellite shot of the system. If that is not available, damage pictures, either during the storm or after the storm, are suitable. In the area that says Formed, indicate the date on which the storm first developed into a tropical depression. In the area that says Dissipated, indicate the date on which the storm lost its tropical characteristics. This includes when the storm became extratropical, or if it dissipated. If the storm dissipated and reformed, include the original start date and the final end date. Highest winds should be the local unit of measurement for speed (mph in non-metric countries, km/h in metric countries), with the other unit in parenthesis. The lowest pressure should be in mbars. Damages should, when available, be in the year of impact, then the present year. The unit of currency can be at your discretion, though typically it should be in USD. Fatalities indicate direct deaths first, then indirect deaths. Areas affected should only be major areas of impact. Specific islands or cities should only be mentioned if majority of the cyclone's effects occurred there.
2. Intro- The intro for every article should be, at a minimum, 2 paragraphs. For more impacting hurricanes, it should be 3. The first should describe the storm in general, including a link to the seasonal article, its number in the season, and other statistics. The second should include a brief storm history, while the third should be impact.
3. Storm history- The storm history should be a decent length, relatively proportional to the longevity of the storm. Generally speaking, the first paragraph should be the origins of the storm, leading to the system reaching tropical storm status. The second should be the storm reaching its peak. The third should be post-peak until landfall and dissipation. This section is very flexible, depending on meteorological conditions, but it should generally be around 3. Storm histories can be longer than three paragraphs, though they should be less than five. Anything more becomes excessive. Remember, all storm impacts, preparations, and records can go elsewhere. Additional pictures are useful here. If the picture in the infobox is of the storm at its peak, use a landfall picture in the storm history. If the picture in the infobox is of the storm at its landfall, use the peak. If the landfall is its peak, use a secondary peak, or even a random point in the storm's history.
4. Preparations- The preparations section can be any length, depending on the amount of preparations taken by people for the storm. Hurricane watches and warnings need to be mentioned here, as well as the number of people evacuated from the coast. Include numbers of shelters, and other info you can find on how people prepared for the storm.
5. Impact- For landfalling storms, the impact section should be the majority of the article. First, if the storm caused deaths in multiple areas, a death table would work well in the top level impact section. A paragraph of the general effects of the storm is also needed. After the intro paragraph, impact should be broken up by each major area. It depends on the information, but sections should be at least one paragraph, if not more. In the major impact areas, the first paragraph should be devoted to meteorological statistics, including rainfall totals, peak wind gusts on land, storm surge, wave heights, beach erosion, and tornadoes. The second should be actual damage. Possible additional paragraphs could be detailed information on crop damage or specifics. Death and damage tolls should be at the end. Pictures are needed, as well. Ideally, there would be at least one picture for each sub-section in the impact, though this sometimes can't happen. For storms that impact the United States or United States territories, this site can be used for rainfall data, including an image of rainfall totals.
6. Aftermath- The aftermath section should describe foreign aid, national aid, reconstruction, short-term and long-term environmental effects, and disease. Also, the storm's retirement information, whether it happened or not, should be mentioned here.
7. Records- This is optional, but can't hurt to be included.
8. Other- The ideal article should have inline sourcing, with the {{cite web}} formatting being preferable. Always double check your writing and make sure it makes sense.

Good luck with future writing, and if you have a question about the above, don't hesitate to ask.

Hurricanehink (talk) 20:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #1

Number 1, June 4, 2006

The Hurricane Herald

This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary of the activities of the WikiProject over the past month and upcoming events over the next month. In addition monthly tropical cyclone activity will be summarized.

You have received this as you are a member of the WikiProject, please add your username in the appropriate section on the mailing list. If you do not add your name to that list, the WikiProject will assume you do not wish to receive future versions of The Hurricane Herald. Sorry if the newsletter breaks your talk page formatting.

Storm of the month

Typhoon Chanchu near its peak intensity

Typhoon Chanchu was the first typhoon and first super typhoon of the 2006 Pacific typhoon season. Forming on May 9 over the open western Pacific Ocean, Chanchu moved over the Philippines on the 11th. There, it dropped heavy rainfall, causing mudslides, crop damage, and 41 deaths. It moved into the South China Sea, where it rapidly strengthened to a super typhoon on May 14, one of only two super typhoons recorded in the sea. It turned to the north, weakened, and struck the Fujian province of China as a minimal typhoon on the 17th. The typhoon flooded 192 houses, while heavy rainfall caused deadly mudslides. In China, Chanchu caused at least 25 deaths and $480 million in damage (2006 USD). Elsewhere on its path, strong waves from the typhoon sank eleven Vietnamese ships, killing at least 44 people. In Taiwan, heavy rainfall killed two people, while in Japan, severe waves killed one person and injured another.

Other tropical cyclone activity

• Tropical Storm Aletta existed in the eastern Pacific Ocean from May 25 to May 29, peaking as a 45 mph tropical storm.

New and improved articles

• New storm articles include: Typhoon Joan (1970), Hurricane Bonnie (1986), Tropical Storm Matthew (2004), Storm of October 1804, Typhoon Chanchu (2006) and Cyclone Olaf.

• New non-storm articles include: Tropical cyclone rainfall climatology, Dvorak technique and List of Bangladesh tropical cyclones.

• New Featured articles: 2005 Atlantic hurricane season, Hurricane Mitch, Hurricane Irene (2005) and Hurricane Claudette (2003)

• Articles which became A/GA class: Hurricane Katrina (A), Effect of Hurricane Katrina on New Orleans (A), Hurricane Felix (1995) (GA), Cyclone Percy (A), Labor Day Hurricane of 1935 (A), List of New Jersey hurricanes (A), Hurricane John (1994) (A), Tropical Storm Isabel (1985) (GA), Tropical Storm Odette (2003) (GA)

New articles and improvements wanted

• An article is requested on subtropical ridge
• The current collaboration of the fortnight is Hurricane Gilbert, please help improve this article.
• Improvements are requested to Indianola Hurricane of 1886, Hurricane Camille and Hurricane Andrew.
• The WikiProject is likely to submit Hurricane John (1994) and Hurricane Katrina to Featured Article Candidates in the near future, so please help improve them to featured standard.

Member of the month

This isn't the generic barnstar, we just don't have a WPTC star yet…

The May member of the month is TitoXD. The WikiProject awards this to him for his brilliant work in improving articles. TitoXD joined the WikiProject in October just after it had been founded. Since then he has contributed substantially to many articles, for example Hurricane Nora (1997), which is currently a Featured Article Candidate. He is also actively involved in the assessment of articles and so helps to improve many more articles.

Explanation of content

If you have a topic which is not directly related to any specific article but is relevant to the WikiProject bring it up on the Newsletters talk page, and it will probably be included in a future edition of The Hurricane Herald.

These two sections are decided by the community on the newsletter's talk page:

• Storm of the month: This is determined by a straw poll on the page. While all storms will be mentioned on the newsletter, the selected storm will be described in more detail.
• Member of the month: Nominations are made on the talk page, voting is by secret ballot; read the talk page for details. The winner receives the WikiProject's barnstar (when we make it).

Main Page content

• 2005 Atlantic hurricane season appeared on the Main Page as Today's Featured Article on June 1.
• Hurricane Floyd will appear on the Main Page as Today's Featured Article on June 17.
• Entries from Dvorak technique, Typhoon Joan (1970), Typhoon Chanchu (2006), and Storm of October 1804 appeared on the Main Page in the Did you know column during May.
• Entries from 5 other articles relating to tropical cyclones had appeared in the Did you know column earlier in 2006.

Storm article statistics

Grade	April	May	June
FA	7	7	10
A	4	5	7
GA	0	3	5
B	62	66	82
Start	154	177	168
Stub	13	12	10
Total	240	263	282
percentage ≥Less than B	69.6	71.6	63.1

The assessment scale

• The cyclone assessment scale is one of the bases of the new assessment scale for Version 1.0 of Wikipedia. It splits articles into several categories by quality, to identify which articles are "finished" and which ones still need to be improved.
• The assessment scale by itself counts of several grades:
  • FA: reserved for articles that have been identified as featured content only.
  • A: this grade is given to articles that are considered ready for Wikipedia:peer review. The way to get this grade assigned to an article is by asking other cyclone editors at the WikiProject's assessment page.
  • GA: reserved for articles that have passed a good article nomination.
  • B: these articles are "halfway there", and have most of the details of a complete article, yet it still has significant gaps in its coverage.
  • Start: articles that fall in this category have a decent amount of content, yet it is weak in many areas. Be bold and feel free to improve them!
  • Stub: these articles are mostly placeholders, and may in some cases be useless for the reader. It needs a lot of work to be brought to A-Class level.
• The way to use these assessments is by adding a parameter to the WikiProject template on the articles talk page ({{hurricane|class=B}} as an example). This feeds the article into a category which is read and parsed to create an assessment table, summary and log.

I dont know if im doing this right, but why are you saying im vandalizing an article by putting a link to the website that has been the originator of the subject that im posting on? What gives???

Im reverting it because after other people reverted it, you kept posting the link to the same site. Its Considered Vandilism on Wikipedia. (By the way, Just click the + by the Edit this page link at the top and you did it right)Robomaeyhem 06:19, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Ok but this was on the Christian Hedonism site, not Satanism. Why would this be considered vandalism since its just changing the stub to a better article? There must be something im missing. And, yes, that was vandalism on the Satanism site, I know, but i was just seeing what it did since i had not read anything about how reverting/bot worked, and was just curious. Actually didnt have intent to vandalize, and was going to change it back but the bot did it almost immediately.

Edit Summary

Your edit summary on Googleism was "rv vandalism". Just to let you know, that was most likely a newbie test, not intentional vandalism. But no harm done. Wikibout 02:37, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

It probably was a newbie test, but from my quick glance of what he changed, it looked like intentional vandalism. Robomaeyhem 02:39, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Ok, as I said no harm done. Wikibout 02:44, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Chuck Norris

I forgot I should answer you here-- Yes, I think that if you can protect the CN article for a bit, that might help things. I'm hoping they will get bored soon! Thanks! Cabiria 08:58, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the help! Now I can take a break... :) Cabiria 09:11, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the warning. Bring them on! I laugh in the face of danger! Ha ha *cough* :) Cabiria 09:18, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page. It seems we have a particularly persistent vandal on our hands... --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 20:07, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

comment re User talk:71.124.114.26

Thanks for stepping in and talking to that guy removing the talk page warnings. You have one of the most unique sigs i've ever seen. Regards, --Alphachimp ^talk 00:46, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Smile.

*~Daniel~* has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

, Keep doing good work. If you keep doing good work, somebody will probably nominate you for adminship. Cheers!! *~Daniel~* 02:47, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

...for the revert. Btw I love that "category 3 hurricane" -- that's original. Keep up the good work! Antandrus (talk) 04:59, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Umm...

that was my ip address editing my page. not vandalism.  Dure  (T) (E) (C) 05:35, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

User Conflict You Were Involved in

I figured I would tell you that Revolver and the anonymous user have been duking it out for a couple of hours on my talk page. I have posted here with my response. Let me know what you think. --Alphachimp ^talk 07:09, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Your signature

Is massive, dude! It's also very, um, colourful. How about a more tame variety? - brenneman ^{L} 00:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Colourful? You're talking to someone who is very serious about colourful sigs. - brenneman ^{L}

You cheeky bugger! You picked the almost the longest one I offered up. Play around with it more and see if you can shorten it, based upon the fact that anything over two lines in the dialog box may give a few editors difficulty in editing. You've also chosen the one with the e-mail link, but haven't activated your e-mail yet? Anyway, thanks for listening. - brenneman ^{L} 01:17, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Current signature

<not_a_real_sig> put here by brenneman

°≈§→Robo°_°maeyhem←§≈°^Talk

</not_a_real_sig>

Gallery one

Note that here the talk links are fake: They go to WP:TODO instead of here, so that you can see what the sig would look like elsewhere.

1. Robomaeyhem | talk 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
2. Robomaeyhem ^(Talk) 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
3. Robomaeyhem^{T} 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
4. Robomaeyhem^E@ 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
5. RoboMaeyhem | E | talk 19:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
6. Robomay°≈§→hem 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Stream two

All the cool kids are redirecting their user page straight to their talk. This is one less link to include, plus it helps to remind us that the encyclopedia is what we're here for. (Links to WP:TODO as above.)

1. Robomaeyhem
2. Robo±maeyhem 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
3. Robomaeyhem ~ 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
4.  Robomaeyhem  13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
5. °≈§→ Robomaeyhem: T/←§≈° 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
6. Robomaeyhem 13:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Vandalism from 65.145.214.203

Thanks for warning him. However, he'd already been warned with a "blocked from editing without further warning" template for some earlier vandalism. So I went ahead and blocked him for 48 hours after he vandalized again. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 01:16, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks mate

Thanks for reverting vandalism to my user page! hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 03:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Signature.

Hello, Do you remember I smiled at you? I'm just asking. Ahh, Did you change your signature? So, Could you response in my talk-page? *~Daniel~* 03:09, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Ello

Sorry about all the vandalism coming from this IP...it's a shared work computer, and I recently showed some of my coworkers how to edit the pages...perhaps a bad choice...

Thanks so much

My first vandal, and you kindly reverted the nonsense. I'm still trying to figure out that one clickie revert thingie. (which I believe is the technical term for it...Ha!) Thanks so much for your help! :) --Cabiria 06:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Great info- I've been reverting the old fashioned way, with cut & paste! Thanks again. --Cabiria 06:56, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Ahh, the Vandal userbox! I can't believe it. It's like I'm a REAL member of Wikipedia now, as silly as that sounds! <ahem> I'd like to thank the Academy, and all those who believed in my ability to make a vandal upset... Ha! --Cabiria 07:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

User:64.48.78.6

This user has 4 strikes against him today from 3 differebt users - is he a block candidate ??? David Humphreys 07:56, 28 June 2006 (UTC) eek! Re User:64.48.78.6 should've said you reverted one of his vandalism attempts David Humphreys 08:02, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

warnings

I didn't violate any policy. Please see Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Trampikey. I don't think that Eskog or whoever should be able to post block threats on my talk page just because he feels so, being an admin doesn't grant him this right. If he argumented properly by what I violated the NPA, that would be great. That he didn't do. ackoz 08:38, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

remove the warning yourself, please

Did you read the discussion? Or did you just press the button because you assumed that the admin was right and I am not? Please be kind and review what you did carefully. ackoz 08:42, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. ackoz 09:05, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Re: Your hurricane userbox.

Cool, thanks. I believe I will use that graph. One problem... My computer, being the horribly disfunctional computer it always is, seems to go haywire every time I try to use the edit count. I'll try to figure it out. Thanks again. →Cyclone1→ 22:22, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Cool, and I'm glad you took my idea and took it further. One thing, though. The hurricane scale should be expanded a bit. 1000 edits is not that much, and shouldn't be Category 5, IMO. Sorry for you, but it should be more like 5000. --Hurricanehink (talk) 02:46, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

OK, just checking. --Hurricanehink (talk) 18:18, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #2

The July issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 00:50, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

User:OMEN

I was not vandalizing, I was currently being renamed, and knocked off the account. Therefore, I went ahead and signed my name with my old account username. I have just been renamed. Thanks for understanding. 24.164.196.105 06:05, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

No problem, i am just confused now. 24.164.196.105 06:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

205.234.106.105

Its an poorly configured and/or broken php proxy. You can see it by the fact that it turns ' into \' everywhere. Its escaping the outputted text. I reported it to WP:OP. Kevin_b_er 06:25, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Looks like it probably is an open proxy. Blocked and page protected, BTW -- Samir धर्म 06:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Re:205.234.106.105

So if its a proxy, he could come back on a different ip then? °≈§→ Robomaeyhem: T/←§≈° 06:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Likely. The scope appears to have taken action on that proxy at least. Kevin_b_er 06:35, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

OK, Im just a little concerned sience he claimed "Its not that hard to track you down to your real location and kill you. Ive done it before" °≈§→ Robomaeyhem: T/←§≈° 06:37, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Mike-seidel-hurricane-wilma.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Mike-seidel-hurricane-wilma.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:05, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Bury nothing

It's usually seen to be better to answer (or even just ignore) spurious items then to remove them. As you wish, of course.
brenneman ^{L} 03:59, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Robomaeyhem! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. fetofs ^Hello! 12:36, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Re: TD4E

The NRL has it as Carlotta on their site: [1] --Ajm⁸¹ 08:06, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the recent vandalism to my userpage :). Fabricationary 05:27, 15 July 2006 (UTC)