RoaringMice

I have confirmed via the webmistress of DK's official website that he is unmarried and also no longer engaged. RoaringMice 17:45, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

And thanks for changing the "marriage" reference to "engaged". Sadly, however, friends tell me that the relationship ended this year. I do not have an article confirming, because this was in private conversation. --RoaringMice 21:38, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for that! --RoaringMice 21:36, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello RoaringMice, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! CobaltBlueTony 15:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC) Getting started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikipedians Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Your edit to Dominic Keating

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also push the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! - CobaltBlueTony 15:41, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

The College of Westchester

This in regards to your question on the help desk. As you can see from the link above, the page does exists. You have edited the article twice and are the only editor listed.--NMajdan•talk 19:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

An article you helped edit is now on WP:UNI/COTF

The current University Collaborations of the Month are Ohio State University & Princess Nora bint Abdul Rahman University
Every month two B-, C- or Start-Class higher education-related articles are chosen for you to improve. Be bold! This COTM is organized by WikiProject Higher Education. (vote for future collaborations or see past collaborations) This collaboration is effective: May 20, 2011 — June 20, 2011 until someone updates it. Pick the next WikiProject Higher Education COTM!

A new round of WikiProject Universities Collaboration of the Fortnight will begin on 04 Jan 2008. Please take a look at our WikiProject article guidelines and help improve the articles. If you have any questions regarding the COTF or have questions/problems on how to improve the article, please place them here. Thanks and Happy Editing! - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 11:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

New WP:UNI/COTF!

The current University Collaborations of the Fortnight are:
Editor Nominated Topic	Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
B-Class Improvement Drive	California Institute of Technology
Start/Stub Improvement Drive	Berklee College of Music
Every fortnight three higher education-related topics, stubs, or red linked articles are chosen for you to improve. Be bold! This COTF is organized by Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities. (Nominate future collaborations or see past collaborations.) This WP:UNI/COTF is effective: Jan 04 2008 ~ Jan 17 2008.

The article you nominated/supported to be Round 4's COTF Editor Nominated Topic has been selected and WP:UNI/COTF Round 4 has begun! Best of luck to you! - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 06:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Fansites

Fansites are generally considered inappropriate external links, which is the only reason I removed them. Acalamari 17:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) Acalamari 20:16, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Minwax

A tag has been placed on Minwax requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 02:21, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Marian Court College

Thank you for your contribution to the article on Marian Court College. Part of the text you added was about class sizes, but did not have any specific figures from a published source. Since it sounded somewhat like promotional material (which of course would not be appropriate in Wikipedia), I took out those few words. However, if you find any specific numbers that can be documented, feel free to add the information to the article. Regards. -- Chonak (talk) 06:32, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

New York Film Academy help

Hi there! I noticed you have edited their page and was wondering if you could help or advise. Jerry Sherlock, the owner, has a pretty messy page without many citations. Also I believe a "controversy" section or something of the like should be added. 2 of his 3 total film and theater projects have been picketed: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,922522,00.html (lolita picketers, and the author also bashes the play)
http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/charlie-chan-and-the-curse-of-the-dragon-queen/Film?oid=1073454 (charlie chan picketers)

He's also gotten a load of bad reviews: http://www.timeout.com/film/reviews/69089/charlie_chan_and_the_curse_of_the_dragon_queen.html http://www.film4.com/reviews/1980/charlie-chan-and-the-curse-of-the-dragon-queen

And was caught buying stolen cameras: http://www.observer.com/node/40726

Is it possible to add all of this and stay neutral?

Thank you for your help SteveWiebe (talk) 15:51, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. When you recently edited Matt Stutzman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athlete (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)