"I do not mean to pry, but you don't by any chance happen to have six fingers on your right hand?"
"Do you always begin conversations this way?"
The Princess Bride

Salah Edin

edit

Salah Edin has been mentioned in the wikipedia article Fitna (film). I know notability is not inherited, but does this address your concern about notability? Thanks, Andjam (talk) 12:39, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yep, so I removed my tag. Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 02:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re:Varrock

edit

Wow, you're fast!!! Thanks for tagging this page. Keep up the good work. ŁittleÄlien¹8² (talk\contribs) 02:12, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 02:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Rising*From*Ashes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! DougsTech (talk) 08:34, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wow, and only 2 years after I joined! Thanks, I think... better late than never! Ironically, this belated welcome arrived at the exact moment I made my 500th edit. Ain't life funny? Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 09:33, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tom T

edit

Hey! I wrote the root article about the greatly-missed Tom T. Thanks for your clean-up of my lead. It is better. Mark Sublette (talk) 06:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Mark SubletteMark Sublette (talk) 06:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much! I was just playing with the random article feature, and I stumbled across the article. It was nice to be able to help, but there wasn't much to do! You had already written such a good article. I had never heard of Tom Terrell before. It was really neat to learn about him. Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 07:10, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
I believe that if you link onto NPR's website (but have not actually checked it out) that some of Tom's reviews are available online. Guess I ought to, huh? I have always appreciated the nature of the collaborative effort of the Wikipedia, and although I consider myself to be an expert wordsmith, it is ALWAYS good to have someone else review your copy. As they tell writers, never proof your own stuff. You have a tendency to overlook the same things again. I was lucky enough to be in the D.C. area from the early '80s, and regularly heard Tom on WHFS. Went to his funeral, as well. His Mom is a lovely, educated, woman! Where R U at?

Mark Sublette (talk) 07:19, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Mark SubletteMark Sublette (talk) 07:19, 11 August 2008 (UTC) Falls Church, VirginiaReply

I live in Washington State, in Thurston County. It is neat that you got to meet his family, though it sounds like the circumstances weren't the best. Thanks again for the kudos! Have a nice night! Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 07:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

CSD tagging

edit

Hello Phoenix. If you nominate the article for speedy deletion, don't forget to notify the creator. The correct template you can find at the bottom of the nomination. Check Brooke glavich and Abraham tesfaye, please. Thanks, have a good day. --Vejvančický (talk) 07:27, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Will do, thanks for reminding me! Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 07:37, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Template

edit

In regards to this User talk:Who gives its ya mum, what's the template for this comment? I see a lot of school kids create articles about themselves and even though I know the {{db-bio}} tag, I don't know the talk page template to leave those editors. Thank you.--The LegendarySky Attacker 09:11, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

When you use a db tag like {{db-bio}}, or in this case {{db-person}}, after the page is saved, if you look at the speedy deletion template you made on the article, it has a bit of code in small print near the bottom that looks something like: " Please consider placing the template:{{subst:nn-warn|Template:Db-person|header=1}} ~~~~ on the talk page of the author. " It changes automatically based on the page in question and the template being used, which is pretty cool. I just copied that code onto User talk:Who gives its ya mum, and it produced the comment. I think a generic version of the template is {{subst:nn-warn|Article}}. A similar, more-welcoming is {{subst:Firstarticle}}. Hope this helps! Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 09:42, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
It does help. Thanks.--The LegendarySky Attacker 09:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
  Yay! Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 09:52, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

My name is Indigo Montoya....

edit

You killed my father, now you die...On CSd's they must claim notability to pass. Notice I say only claim, in the case of the Isreali hotel, this is an ad article and could've been tagged as the only signifacance they imply is a trademark.Jake/Hell In A Bucket (talk) 08:52, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Touché! You got me! I had a feeling that it could have been CSDed, but I was editing late at night, and was too sleepy to remember things like {{db-inc}}. Glad to see another The Princess Bride fan on here! Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 19:16, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply


My name is Rick Toh....

edit

The article "Blowing Wings" was a education portfolio I submitted previously that won an award in my organisation (a statutory board). Will that suffice in credibility? Ricktoh (talk) 10:22, 21 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dear Rick,
First of all, congratulations on having your portfolio win the award in your organization. You clearly put a lot of hard work into it. That being said, I have several concerns about whether Blowing wings meets Wikipedia's policies for inclusion. First of all, this article having been based on your portfolio, Education: Clipping Vs Blowing Wings, leads me to concerns that Wikipedia's policy of no original research is being violated; also, as you yourself are the author of both the portfolio and the article, it seems to me that you have a conflict of interest in this subject. Also, the article does not seem to satisfy Wikipedia's policy regarding verifiability, which states that articles need multiple third-party sources that mention the subject of the article; all of the references you listed were published before the subject itself existed, making it seem unlikely that they established its notability. Also, as your term "Blowing wings" is relatively unknown as of now (when I Googled it, I only found copies of the Wikipedia article), it would probably be considered a neologism, and articles on neologisms are generally discouraged.
Please don't take offense about this; your work seems very important, but at the moment, given these concerns, I am not convinced that it is appropriate for Wikipedia. That being said, if, after you have read the policies I mentioned above, you still disagree with my proposed deletion, you can always remove the proposed deletion tag from the top of the article; if you do not remove the tag, the page will likely be automatically deleted once the time period expires. If you choose to remove the tag, I may list this page for discussion at Articles For Deletion so that other editors can weigh in; maybe I am wrong about this article, and it does belong.
Best wishes either way. Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 09:12, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Reply


NPOV edit on Shooter movie

edit

Dude, regarding the edit to "Shooter" (movie), if you want to change the comment to be more neutral, feel free. However, the "military advisor's" statement is 100% pure and utter bullshit. To cite but one "reference", David Drake (sci-fi author) was an intelligence officer in Vietnam, and in the afterword to one of his novels, he discusses interrogating a Vietnamese girl who was shot by a .50BMG round. Her limbs were not scattered 200 yards away, she lived for enough time after being shot to have a conversation with him. The hydrostatic shock did considerable internal damage, but hardly peeled her apart like a banana, nor dismembered her.

I realize that the statement in the article is (presumably) a direct quote from the so-called advisor, but the best you can say about his statement is that it is "dramatic." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.212.195.136 (talk) 04:16, 5 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Well, it sounds like you know more about this than I do. Calling something "nonsense" in an article comes across pretty opinionated, so it might raise red flags with other editors; you might choose a word that has less stigma to it, or give more of the explanation you shared here. Just be sure to back up what you say with references or else it might come across as original research. Alternatively, you could bring up your concerns on the article's talk page and discuss it with the other editors. Sorry if it felt like I stepped on your toes. Best wishes and happy editing! Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 04:31, 5 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Louis Congo

edit

The DYK project (nominate) 18:03, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Children's and Young Adult literature Newsletter

edit

  Newsletter September 2010

Project news
  • Welcome to the first edition of the WikiProject Children's literature newsletter! If you are interested in contributing or want more information, you can find us in the Outreach department.
  • The project now has a list of its most popular pages. The mosts visited page in our project's scope in July was List of Twilight characters which was visited 538088 times from July 1st to July 31st; which means it was visited a whopping 17357 a day.
  • Due to the combined efforts of several editors, the backlog of nearly 4000 unassessed articles has been eradicated in less than six months. Thanks to everyone who took part!
Collaboration article

Don't forget that the current Children's literature collaboration article is Curious George (book). Be sure to get involved and together we can make the article a better quality.


From the Editors

Hello and welcome to this, the inaugural edition of the WikiProject Children's literature newsletter. We're very excited about it and we hope that you will enjoy reading it. We're still in the early stages, though, and need your suggestions and feedback. Do you like the newsletter? What would you like to see in the next edition? Please give us your feedback on this issue here. We really value it.

Current discussions

The project's current discussions are as follows:


Got a suggestion for a future issue or want to help on the next newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? - It's all here


Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Children's literature at 15:44, 1 September 2010 (UTC).Reply

Dani

edit

There is many many footballer known as just D-A-N-I, the only words appeared on their shirt, in although their real given given name isn't. The same case appeared in English football, Andy vs Andrew, Steve vs Steven, etc. Matthew_hk tc 06:56, 27 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Children and Young Adult's literature Newsletter - October 2010

edit

  Newsletter October 2010

Project news
Unreferenced BLPs

There's only a few Unreferenced BLPs (Biographies of living people) left. Why not head over to the page and help by adding sources to the articles? It's an important job, that requires assistance.


From the Editor

Hello and welcome to this, the second edition of the newsletter. This month, I need to ask a favour of you. You may have seen that this month I had to write the newsletter by my self. I really need your help with writing and giving suggestions. If you have a suggestion for a future edition, please list it at the tips desk. You may also notice the links underneath this piece. Please use them to share this newsletter on your favourite social networks. Until next time, happy editing!


Share:  Twitter · Identica · Facebook · Delicious · Reddit · Digg · Buzz · StumbleUpon
Ways to promote the project
If you're interested in promoting the project, why not visit the Outreach department for more ideas?

There are many ways to promote the project. One of them is to add the project's ad to your userpage. To do this, simply add the code {{Template:Wikipedia ads|ad=212}} to your talk or user page. Another thing you can do is to invite other users to join the project. To find prospective members search the history pages of Children's literature-related articles and invite people who seem to be deoing good things for these articles. The code for the invitation template is {{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Children's literature/Invite}}.

Want to help on the next newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? - It's all here



Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Children's literature at 00:05, 1 October 2010 (UTC).Reply

Children and Young Adult's literature WikiProject Newsletter - Issue 3

edit

  Newsletter November 2010

Project news
  • The project's most popular page in September was Harry Potter which received 481902 views throughout the month. That means that it received on average 16063 views each day. It's a GA which is Top importance within the project's scope. To see more popular pages head over to the list now.
  • The Children's literature Portal is up for Peer review. Please feel free to chime in here.
  • Pandawing$ has joined the project. Thanks for joining Pandawing$.
Articles needing infoboxes

There are lots of articles within this project's scope without infoboxes. They can help to improve the quality of an article by adding a brief overview. It's a task that won't take very long so why not head over now and help out?


From the Editor

Hello and welcome to this, the third edition of our WikiProject's newsletter. In this month's newsletter, I encountered a problem, well, two problems actually. I needed some help with the production: suggestions and other writers. As with last month, if you have any suggestions for the newsletter, please add them at the Tips Desk. If you would like to write some of the next issue, that's even better! Just come go over to the main Newsletter page to see where you can help out, and of course, as always, please give us your feedback on this edition, on the talk page. Until next time, happy editing!


Share:  Twitter · Identica · Facebook · Delicious · Reddit · Digg · Buzz · StumbleUpon
Children's literature news


Want to help on the next newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? - It's all here



Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Children's literature at 18:09, 1 November 2010 (UTC).Reply

Psychedelic Festival

edit

hey , thanks for helping me with my article, im sorry i messed up your quote, it was a mistake , i wanted to ask you if you could add those little right side picture of the festival you quoted Burning mann , i want to define this term , wicht i think its important since its such an old term , and millions of people going to this events ,thanks please reaply , im still learning the ins and outs of the system so contact me or help thanks ,nice to meet you !! "Startigenix (talk) 10:32, 22 July 2011 (UTC)"Reply

DYK for Tatoosh Range

edit

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:17, 31 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Marillenschnaps

edit

I asked for help sourcing this article on Wikipedia:WikiProject Austria. I thought that was a smart move since I can't read the sources and because I don't know anything about Austrian drinks. Joe Chill (talk) 02:31, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

That sounds like a great plan! Yeah, it seems like it has the potential to be notable, but I know so little about it, and the language barrier does present some difficulties. Good idea! Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 02:50, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

DYK

edit

Just letting you know that the reason I haven't taken another look at your DYK is that I can't approve it for the queue if I'm the one who reviewed the hook without extreme COI. When someone else gets to it though I'm sure it will be fine. Sorry it is taking so long! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 02:06, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

That makes sense. Thanks for explaining! Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 02:19, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Roger Took

edit

Problem is the Media hasn't picked up his death at all. Its almost like its being covered up. I didn't know who he was untill after he killed himself. If there is no way to cite a source, does that mean it stays a secret? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sulla1982 (talkcontribs) 06:42, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ah, but if you are the only one reporting his death, and are using your own knowledge as a source for the information, than that is a violation of Wikipedia's policy "No original research," which is well worth reading, but in a nutshell says: "Wikipedia does not publish original thought: all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position not clearly advanced by the sources." Keep looking for those reliable sources, but keep in mind that Wikipedia is very cautious when it comes to biographies. Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 20:06, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Monarch Contemporary Art Center and Sculpture Park

edit

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 10 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit

Hi Ashes!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 01:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Mildred (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mildred Gordon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 19 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Niva International School

edit

Hi. I see you just tagged this school article as an advert after I had spent some time cleaning out the puff and restructuring for NPOV. I'm curious to know what criteria you applied, and perhaps also why you didn't consider making any further improvements yourself. Cheers, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:42, 20 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi! My power is out, and our internet keeps crashing. Somehow, the version I had read was the one that was there before you cleaned up the article; it had the mission statements, philosophy, vision statements, etc. That was the version I was trying to tag as reading like an advertisement, not the one you improved, yet my edit came in after yours. I'm not sure how. Sorry about the confusion. And as for why I didn't make further improvements, as I said, my internet connection has been shaky. I wanted to mark the article so that I could come back to it once my connection stabilized, which I did today. I have removed the advertisement tag, as it doesn't apply. Best wishes! Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 17:55, 20 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Good enough reason. Been there done that - and got the T-shirt :) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:59, 20 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

George Martorano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Non
Lindy (name) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lyndon
Lindy West (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Guardian
Mind-body interventions during pregnancy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Relaxation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I moved your template

edit

I have moved User:Rising*From*Ashes/w-vandalism-fighter to the template namespace and renamed it. I also made some changes to the template code and documentation. It's a very useful template, and I added it to the top of the list of specialized templates at Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome templates. __meco (talk) 19:25, 17 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

That sounds great! Thank you for doing that! Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 05:38, 18 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. When you recently edited Longnecker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Longenecker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Rising*From*Ashes. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, SteviethemanDelivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Rising*From*Ashes. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Abraham Hatfield

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Abraham Hatfield at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Applodion (talk) 19:44, 12 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Abraham Hatfield

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Abraham Hatfield at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:21, 1 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Template:Did you know nominations/Abraham Hatfield

edit

Hello Rising*From*Ashes. As you have not edited since early August, I have now marked your DYK nomination of Abraham Hatfield for closure as stale. Please return to editing as soon before the nomination is closed if you wish for the nomination to continue. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:47, 18 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Rising*From*Ashes. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply