Welcome!

Hello, RWIR, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 15:56, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Rubies of Eventide

edit

You edited the image at http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/File:Tavern.jpg that was associated with the article Rubies of Eventide. The description of the image explicity says and said at the time you made the change that it was a "Screeenshot from the game "Rubies of Eventide". " and the photo you replaced it with does not meet these qualifications. Please do not change images already used in articles unless the new image also meets the image's qualifications. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TVR Enthusiast (talkcontribs) 21:27, 17 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Richard Waldron

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Richard Waldron, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.surfingincognito.com/index.php?q=aHR0cDovL2VuLndpa2lwZWRpYS5vcmcvd2lraS9Vc2VyOlJXSVI%3D. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:58, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Vanessa Hillman

edit
 

The article Vanessa Hillman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable local singer. Appears to fail WP:MUSIC.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ttonyb (talk) 04:21, 20 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Vanessa Hillman

edit

I have nominated Vanessa Hillman, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Hillman. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ttonyb (talk) 04:52, 20 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Vanessa Hillman AFD

edit

Hi. I've closed this discussion as "delete," but I placed a copy of the article in your user space at User:RWIR/sandbox/Vanessa Hillman so you don't lose your work. If addition sources are located that show notability, the article can be restored. Thanks. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 13:28, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your helpRWIR (talk) 23:15, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the message

edit

Sorry, didn't mean to be rude but you didn't sign the message you left at my talk page, and it took me a bit to figure out who left it. Yes, I have tried to give somewhat equal weight to the descendants of both Deacon John of Hingham and Thomas of Hampton. They were both interesting characters, while apparently unrelated. Have noticed your work on the New Hampshire folks, and I hope that that continues to go well. MarmadukePercy (talk) 05:50, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Non-free files in your user space

edit

  Hey there RWIR, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:RWIR/Thomas Westbrook. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

  • See a log of files removed today here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Westbrook image

edit

Hi, thanks for the message. I'm afraid I'm not the best person to ask about the image question. I tend to upload everything to Commons, and go from there. I haven't had a great deal of experience using 'non-free images' because the rationale for their use is tricky, and I tend to shy away from using them. You might ask someone else, though. I think you might have a hard time justifying use of the image on the article about the man, as odd as that sounds. But as I say, I'm no expert in these matters. Take care. MarmadukePercy (talk) 09:03, 23 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Good images you've added. Also, I didn't realize you were in Vancouver. (Thought you might be in New Hampshire. ;-) ) Vancouver's a great place. Did your family leave the states as Loyalists, if you don't mind my asking? I had quite a number who did, and left for New Brunswick, but who eventually returned. Best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 07:51, 27 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Hi again. If I may make a suggestion, when you upload good images like File:Benning council chambers.JPG, you might want to upload them to Commons instead of to wikipedia. That way more folks have access to the image, and I've found it easier to work with images over there. At first it can be a little intimidating, but I think you'll find that there are some very helpful administrators over there. If you need any help on that, please let me know. MarmadukePercy (talk) 22:16, 29 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Garrison.JPG

edit

You overwrote one of my picks, File:Garrison.JPG, with a picture of your own. Please change the name of your file because the picks are not related and each pick should exist, not replace one another. Thanks! QFL 24-7 bla ¤ cntrb ¤ kids ¤ pics ¤ vids 13:50, 28 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Vancouver Wikipedia 10th Anniversary Meetup

edit

Infobox

edit

Hi again. Not all articles need infoboxes. In the case of John Leavitt, I think the piece is much better without one. Regards, MarmadukePercy (talk) 07:59, 27 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

No worries. I just think that that entry has such strong visuals that an infobox isn't needed and tends to clutter things up. Hope things are good with you. Best, 18:32, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Pointless

edit

Please read this re File:Waldron Street.jpg. And read this about reporting permission via OTRS. Also, unless the copyright holder unaccountably insists on fair-use, you should upload to the Commons. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:29, 5 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to Vancouver meetup

edit

Hello,

Wikipedian British Columbians are planning a meetup at the Vancouver Public Library, Central Branch, on Sunday, October 16th, as part of the Wikipedia Loves Libraries events. If you wish to attend, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Vancouver and add your signature to the list.

Thank you! InverseHypercube 03:06, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to Vancouver meetup

edit

Hello,

You are invited to an edit-a-thon at the Prophouse Café on Sunday March 25, as part of Women's History Month events all over the world. If you wish to attend, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Vancouver WikiWomen's Edit-a-Thon and add your signature to the list.

Thank you! InverseHypercube (talk) 09:37, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ortonville, New Brunswick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Olympian, Settlement, Salmon River and Unincorporated

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 5 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Loren Brigham Laceste for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loren Brigham Laceste is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loren Brigham Laceste until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SyG (talk) 14:58, 9 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Narima dela Cruz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ateneo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 29 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

May 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Apothecary to the Household may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • //trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/49960633?searchTerm=mystery.&searchLimits= "Palace Duties"](Broken Hill, New South Wales, 2 August 1954, p.9 accessed 20 July 2012</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:40, 6 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Wentworth Loring may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • The British Navy ship [[HMS Loring (K565)] was named after him.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:57, 12 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Nigel Loring, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MRCS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 18 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Watson (journalist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Degree. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 25 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of PNT Singing Idol for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PNT Singing Idol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PNT Singing Idol until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 11:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Richard Waldron IV for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Waldron IV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Waldron IV until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Please be aware, Wikipedia is not the place for you to conduct genealogical research. This is an encyclopedia. We rely on secondary sources and apply specific criteria for notability. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:20, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Thomas Westbrook Waldron (Canada) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Westbrook Waldron (Canada) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Westbrook Waldron (Canada) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, RWIR. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of PNT Singing Idol for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PNT Singing Idol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PNT Singing Idol (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:37, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, RWIR. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, RWIR. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

June 12, 2019 edit-a-thon at "Atla Annual 2019" in Vancouver British Columbia

edit
1000 Women in Religion: A Wikipedia edit-a-thon at "Atla Annual 2019" in Vancouver, British Columbia
 
Sheraton Vancouver Wall Center

The 1000 Women in Religion Project is working to improve the coverage of women’s contributions to religious, spiritual and wisdom traditions worldwide. In support of this goal, the edit-a-thon at Atla's (formerly the American Theological Library Association) annual meeting will focus on improving articles about women in religion. We would love to have a few Vancouver area Wikipedians to help us get new editors oriented and editing!!

Wednesday, June 12, 2019
8:00am-12:00pm
Sheraton Vancouver Wall Centre
1088 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6Z 2R9 Canada

Dzingle1 (talk)Dzingle1 (talk) 15:50, 29 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:CLINTON HONOURS FALLEN crop.jpg

edit
 

The file File:CLINTON HONOURS FALLEN crop.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of John Boyarski for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Boyarski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Boyarski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hirolovesswords (talk) 22:22, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply