Your submission at AfC Gennady Chibisov was accepted

edit
 
Gennady Chibisov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Arthur goes shopping (talk) 12:28, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Prof John Peacock, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Prof John Peacock! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:12, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rollo Edward Atkinson (May 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 13:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Prof John Peacock. Thank you for your work on Peter J. Young. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice job on the article. Keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 TT me 14:16, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Prof John Peacock. Thank you for your work on Peter Scheuer. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I am prepared to believe that he passes WP:NPROF, but this page needs considerable work. I have marked a couple of paragraphs where sources are needed, many other paragraphs also need them. In addition, opinions can only be included if they are supported by sources, otherwise they are original research and not allowed. Also, this is a bit too much like an essay on him rather than a Wikipedia page. Lastly, what about his awards? FRS or other? These matter here. I will leave the page here for it to be improved. If nothing is done in a reasonable timeframe it should be moved to a draft. Ask questions if needed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 15:26, 4 January 2025 (UTC)Reply