User talk:PigeonChickenFish/Archives/2023/February
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:PigeonChickenFish. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you!
Thank you for recently created articles on the California State Convention of Colored Citizens, Black Times: Voices of the National Community, and Nathaniel W. Depee, and for helpful edits on Mirror of the Times! Important and underrepresented history. Urve (talk) 02:45, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Urve: and thank you too for all of your work here and for the creation of the Mirror of the Times. I always welcome collaborations, so please feel free to expand or edit any of the mentioned. I look forward to seeing you around here! PigeonChickenFish (talk) 21:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Improved workflow
In the future, if you are moving a page in order to create a dab in its place, simply edit the redirect to create the dab - there is no reason to G6 the redirect in order to move a draft, as you did with Daniel Bentley. It's not the end of the world that you did it, but it does mean extra/unnecessary work (especially for waiting around for an admin) and it's happened a couple of times now so I thought I would mention it. Primefac (talk) 08:05, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Primefac: hello and thank you for the note. I am sorry if I was making the process complicated but I am confused. When I read the link WP:G6, it does mention tagging the article for a speedy delete for uncontroversial maintenance. Do we want the pre-history of the article redirects tied to the new DAB page? From my limited understanding, clean up was part of the admin process of deleting and moving the page (per WP:POSTMOVE). PigeonChickenFish (talk) 08:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- It doesn't really matter if what came before the dab was a redirect, so save yourself the wait and save an admin needing to take action and just overwrite the redirect. We do not need to "sanitise" the history of pages so that the only thing in them is related to the current version of the article. Primefac (talk) 09:01, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- OK, thank you. I will work to do that going forward. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 09:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- It doesn't really matter if what came before the dab was a redirect, so save yourself the wait and save an admin needing to take action and just overwrite the redirect. We do not need to "sanitise" the history of pages so that the only thing in them is related to the current version of the article. Primefac (talk) 09:01, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
There are much more merged female/male slavicized/slavic surname pages than the splitted ones
There are much more merged female/male slavicized/slavic names than the splitted ones. Why should the number of articles be artificially increased? Geysirhead (talk) 01:04, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bourbon County, Kentucky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Centerville, Kentucky.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
|
The Women in Red barnstar |
| Awarded to PigeonChickenFish for making lists of Afghan writers and artist and all your good work to create articles about notable women. CT55555(talk) 23:48, 8 February 2023 (UTC) |
- @CT55555: thank you! I hope to work with you more in the future. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 23:56, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Any chance I could twist your arm into writing up an entry on A. H. W. Ross? You did such an amazing job on Giles Beecher Jackson. FloridaArmy (talk) 05:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- @FloridaArmy:, no problem I am always here to help, I will check it out soon. I hope you are well! PigeonChickenFish (talk) 06:06, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
This entry looks interesting. No idea if their are any copyvios or other issues but it likes like Encyclopedia Britannica had an entry on it? Thanks for all your great work. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging