Pegasus-BSG62
Coffey
editThe article is not that bad and you seem to be a bit partisan about it. If you have any exact problems with the content please talk about it on the talkpage. Off2riorob (talk) 23:23, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
I thought I listed the specific problems on the talk page already? I don't know why you think I'm partisan, as I've posted comments on all 3 wikipedia pages of the NYAG election candidates, asking for revisions to make them neutral, because they all read like PR ads. Coffey's is the most so (based on both the language and the fact that most of it was written by 3 people who did nothing but write the Coffey page and link other pages to it), but all of them have neutrality problems of varying degrees. -Pegasus-BSG62 (talk) 23:27, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
So if you think they have issues, improve them, make them better. If you need my help or advice, please feel free to ask. Off2riorob (talk) 23:30, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
I can't improve them directly without knowing more about the candidates (to add details). Someone who knows more information about one or more candidate(s) needs to do that. Some of the candidates, in particular, are "dark horse" candidates don't have much of a paper trail online or in reputable sources, so I can't add anything to the articles myself, but that also doesn't mean that their PR teams should make their wiki pages one-sided advertisements. What prevents me from fixing the articles myself is not questions about WP policy that I can ask and get an easy answer to, but lack of substantive knowledge of the subject, necessary to make additions. -Pegasus-BSG62 (talk) 23:33, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, you are quite new, you have 30 edits here and , you are not going to get anywhere that you will like by reverting my edits. 23:34, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Am I breaking a rule by reverting one of your edits? If so, please show me the rule. And I actually didn't revert your change. I did post a different tag asking for discussion of neutrality, for people who don't automatically click into the talk page. So there's no need for threatening language like that in your previous comment. Thanks.-Pegasus-BSG62 (talk) 23:36, 9 May 2010 (UTC)