Welcome!

edit
 
Hello, Pamdex!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

 Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, CMD (talk) 00:33, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proper referencing

edit

Please see WP:REFB vice WP:EL for how to properly cite sources. You recently added external links to several articles (FAO links) and these should be converted into proper references. - UtherSRG (talk) 02:53, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thank you very much for the feedback! I indeed thought the way I cite the data could be improved and was reading up on citation guidelines. How about replacing:
as reported by the FAO. Source: FAO.
by:
as reported by the FAO<ref>FAO. 2024. Global Production. In: Fisheries and Aquaculture. [Cited Friday, December 6th 2024]. https://www.fao.org/fishery/en/collection/global_production?lang=en</ref> Pamdex (talk) 12:20, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
You don't even need the "as reported by FAO" portion. Please consider using a {{cite web}} template to format the reference. Then you don't have to worry about which parts to put in italics, etc.: {{cite web |title=Fisheries and Aquaculture {{!}} Global Production |year=2024 |author=FAO |url=https://www.fao.org/fishery/en/collection/global_production?lang=en |access-date=2024-12-06}} We prefer to use the templates even though the citation isn't as recommended by the individual websites as this lends to internal consistency. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:43, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply