June 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm Shovon76. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Bengali alphabet, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Shovon (talk) 18:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

July 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Cyrillic script, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:28, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Thai language. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 12:48, 4 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

August 2014

edit

  Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Urdu keyboard. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 09:46, 10 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

September 2014

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Arabic keyboard. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 12:31, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

February 2016

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 12:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Noorswelm (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

it was correct related subject Noorswelm (talk) 12:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This account has done nothing but insert links to a single website. --jpgordon::==( o ) 15:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.