NiceWikiEditor5
Welcome
editHello, NiceWikiEditor5, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! wizzito | say hello! 02:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
Bogus RFPP reports
editRegarding this report; that article hasn't had a vandalism revert since July. Please don't use RFPP unless you understand our WP:PROTECTION policy. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:23, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
This is not true It's unfortunate my good faith efforts have been labeled as bogus: I made it in good faith, applying the policy as written;
I created a report because the last IP edits have been Silly vandalism, as in Wikipedia:Vandalism. I have fully read Wikipedia:PROTECTION, and the criteria for semi-protection:
- All or almost all the vandalism is coming from IP addresses. (Yes)
- Unregistered editors should be making very few quality contributions to the article compared to the amount of vandalism coming from unregistered editors (Yes)
- There are regularly many new vandals (Yes)
Articles about kids toys are prone to vandalism, specially this one.
NiceWikiEditor5 (talk) 18:36, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- By the way, Wikipedia:Protection_policy should be clearer about the time frame: I looked at the last few edits and found significant Silly vandalism, even though not in the last few months. NiceWikiEditor5 (talk) 18:48, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- If you think we should protect an article that was last vandalized three months ago, that indicates to me that you don't understand our policy yet. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- I assumed just look at the last few edits was enough. I now know to account for the time frame. Thank you. NiceWikiEditor5 (talk) 23:26, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- If you think we should protect an article that was last vandalized three months ago, that indicates to me that you don't understand our policy yet. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- By the way, Wikipedia:Protection_policy should be clearer about the time frame: I looked at the last few edits and found significant Silly vandalism, even though not in the last few months. NiceWikiEditor5 (talk) 18:48, 17 October 2022 (UTC)