Newzild
Welcome!
edit
|
A barnstar for you!
editThe Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
For your efforts in improving the article's coherency. Not many editors have a depth of knowledge in grammar much like you do! YuMaNuMa Contrib 13:14, 12 April 2012 (UTC) |
No Gun Ri
editThanks for editing No Gun Ri Massacre. That page has a long history, and any fresh eyes on it are much appreciated. GAB (talk) 15:00, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Nice edits at Austen
editYour nice edits at Jane Austen looked useful and I have recently added a new section on Themes to the article with an eye to improving the biography. There is currently a nice article on the British author Ian Fleming which looked well-crafted and I was wondering if you might have any comments on the relative quality of the Austen article at this time if you have a chance to glance at it. Cheers. Fountains-of-Paris (talk) 17:29, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Alan McGregor Peart (August 4)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alan McGregor Peart and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! Newzild,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gbawden (talk) 06:02, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
|
October 2016
editHmm... it turns out your constant editing to Light fighter are better than I thought. It turns out you are actually removing POV material and unencyclopedic content for example, so that's good. I should've checked more thoroughly. -- AI RPer (talk) 00:09, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For your contributions to Light fighter that may seem crazy to the untrained eye but overall good since your persistent editing helps make the article more neutral and encyclopedic. -- AI RPer (talk) 00:10, 7 October 2016 (UTC) |
Your draft article, Draft:Alan McGregor Peart
editHello, Newzild. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Alan McGregor Peart".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 10:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
I went ahead and fixed the reference for you and fixed the Youtube video, I'm not sure if it was you, not logging in, who changed the time of the video start, but that cleared up the confusion. I'm really not sure if Youtube is even a reliable reference to be honest. Sorry for all of the rollbacks, I just didn't have time to fix it myself at the time, but I knew it wasn't right. Pennsy22 (talk) 05:58, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 1
editAlert
editPlease carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Electronic cigarette topic area, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Disambiguation link notification for August 2
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trench warfare, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 13
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Melania Trump, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 6
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tauranga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Napier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Newzild. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
World Chess Championship 1972
editI'm impressed how many opportunities you found to improve the phrasing. Thanks! Bruce leverett (talk) 14:44, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
de Havilland Mosquito
edit- Hello, I noticed you have made several edits to de Havilland Mosquito and was just wondering about a possible addition. When I see an article that includes things concerning speed: "fast transport", "fast bomber", "innovative high-speed aircraft", "faster than foreseeable enemy fighter aircraft" and "fast aircraft" I wonder why there is not content in the infobox such as: maximum speed= 275 mph (445 km/h) at 15,000 ft.? This sort of information becomes more than trivia when advanced multiple times in an article and I would think the speed of most aircraft articles something of importance to be able to quickly find. Otr500 (talk) 10:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editBlockchain and cryptocurrency general sanctions alert
editYou are receiving this notice because you recently edited one or more pages relating to blockchain or cryptocurrencies topics. You have not done anything wrong. We just want to alert you that "general" sanctions are authorized for certain types of edits to those pages.
A community decision has authorized the use of general sanctions for pages related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after the editor has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editDisambiguation link notification for October 26
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeremy Wells, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Media.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Your edit: https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Curtis_LeMay&diff=next&oldid=1206070176 left a partial reference. Can you fix it? Thanks. 76.14.122.5 (talk) 20:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
editHello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research
editHello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,