Nepali Bibek
- Nepali Bibek (talk · contribs · logs · block log · page moves · count · edit summaries · non-automated edits · articles created · BLP edits · AfD votes · XfD votes · admin score (beta) · no prior RfA)
 Archives | |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
|
Contents
|
Varun's Guestbook Barnstar | |
| Sign my guestbook and win this Barnstar. Simple! Varun ☎ |
Nepali Bibek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not sockpuppet of sarojupreti and there are no any strong proof about this matter too. I even don't know who sarojupreti is. Bbb23 just blocked me unfairly. All my contributions are gone as well.Please unblock me.
Decline reason:
Given the editing and behavior I find that hard to believe. The match with the other active socks and time wasting social media activity is also good behavioral evidence. —SpacemanSpiff 16:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@Nepali keto62, your reason is "I am not sockpuppet of sarojupreti and there are no any strong proof about this matter too. I even don't know who sarojupreti is. Bbb23 just blocked me unfairly. All my contributions are gone as well.Please unblock me."
But first explain how? —Constanstin 16:19, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
- @Constanstin: thanks for your try. But only administrators can block or unblock other users. Please ask them to visit here and review my notice.—Nepali keto62 Questions?!?!? 16:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
- I don't think any administrator will unblock you unless you explain how you're not related to Sarojupreti. You have been blocked because of technical evidence found by the checkuser. Meaning, that your IP address and Sarojupreti's IP address are either similar or identical. Ayub407talk 16:48, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Just ping the blocking admin, which is Bbb23, and please wait. And if you're really the sock, then just go to your master account "sarojupreti" and make unblock request on your master account. —Constanstin 16:48, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Nepali keto62, if you want to be unblock, just explain as much better as you can. —Constanstin 16:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
- @Constanstin: But the sockmaster sarojupreti is not my account. Then how can I unblock myself.—Nepali keto62 Questions?!?!? 17:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Nepali keto62, it's difficult now, please E-Mail the blocking admin, and tell them that you're not a sock. Click Here and E-Mail the blocking admin. —Constanstin 17:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Nepali Bibek. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Template:Gauri Khan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 10:01, 14 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumal people until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paradoxsociety 07:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
{{subst:WikiProject Nepal/The 10,000 Challenge Invite}} ~~~~ Thanks. 
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply