User talk:MinorProphet/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Cannibalism in popular culture, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Procne and Philomela (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC) Done

Talkback

I replied to you at Talk:Penrose tiling#Robinson triangles. Regards. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 11:40, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Number theory

Hi MinorProphet - This looks very good! I'm afraid you'll have to wait for at least a week (or rather ten days or so) for further comments from me, since I am very busy with (real-life, number-theoretical) work... Garald (talk) 22:23, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Number theory

Sorry for having been out of action for so long. Your proposed edits look very good; please go ahead and carry them out. On Vardi´s comments on Archimedes - make cautious statements and reference them carefully (cite both Vardi and the works he cites); I am not sure of whether there is a consensus there. Garald (talk) 10:47, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

List of alloys

What does that make cementite? Plasmic Physics (talk) 00:49, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Hmm, an interesting one. Is cementite a compound or an alloy? Does light behave like waves or particles? Technically (and to avoid a direct answer) you could call cementite an iron-carbon alloy phase. In its purest form, it is classified as a ceramic. To recap and to remind myself:

Cementite is the crystalline form of iron carbide, a hard, brittle, stoichiometric, intermetallic, metastable iron-carbon phase (or crystal structure) found in steel alloys. It has the strict chemical formula Fe3C (e.tc.), unlike other iron-carbon phases which are non-stoichiometric and are formed within a range of proportions.

In eutectoid steel (Fe + 0.83 wt% C), ferrite (effectively pure iron) and cementite grow co-operatively as a lamellar mixture (or microstructure), pearlite.

In hypereutectoid steel (Fe + >0.77 wt% C) the structure is mostly pearlite with small grains of extra cementite scattered throughout.

White cast iron contains mostly monoclinic cementite with some silicon, making it very hard and brittle with limited ductility. Cementite is a metastable iron-carbon phase, and will decompose into stable graphite given the right conditions: namely, a higher silicon content and slower cooling of the molten mixture results in grey cast, containing graphite. Phase diagrams, etc. On a slight tangent, I came across this paper on Mechanical properties of cementite. > MinorProphet (talk) 19:04, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

I did further research, and found that scandium hydride in this context is a substance held together by metallic bonding. Metallic bonding is found within alloys and metals. I've also found that "compound" and "alloy" are not mutually exclusive terms. Plasmic Physics (talk) 13:45, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

The Miracle (1912 film)

Regarding your question at the Help Desk: as you've perhaps seen, the history merge that you requested is now complete. For future reference, you don't have to do this (it's fine to copy/paste something you wrote in userspace to create a new mainspace article), but of course there's also nothing wrong with moving pages or requesting history merges. Nyttend (talk) 13:58, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your helpful message, I also thanked User:Anthony_Appleyard, who did the merge. I think it was just a case of me being in a hurry, not knowing exactly what to do, and not bothering to find out. > MinorProphet (talk) 08:41, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

The subject of this article seems to be (with a few significant differences) the same film dealt with in the article Das Mirakel (1912 film). I have started a content-merge discussion at Talk:The Miracle (1912 film). Cheers!--ShelfSkewed Talk 15:55, 18 December 2012 (UTC) Done

20 Frith Street

Hi, MinorProphet. Wow, just... wow. That is awesome. --Shirt58 (talk) 01:36, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Had to be done. Thank you. > MinorProphet (talk) 01:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	WP:NPP is often and with some justification criticised. I do NPP because I enjoy it. I love learning new stuff. Discovering jewels in the Wikipedia crown like 20 Frith Street is exactly why I find it pleasurable. Shirt58 (talk) 09:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Inclines head, bows, swirls hat etc. > MinorProphet (talk) 19:40, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Removed some old bot-type dabs etc. MinorProphet (talk) 16:04, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Seidlitz five-stroke engine

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Seidlitz five-stroke engine, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheLongTone (talk) 12:41, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Taking a powder...

I think Uncyclopaedia might have been a better location... Peridon (talk) 12:55, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

WP:JSTOR access

Hello, WP:The Wikipedia Library has record of you being approved for access to JSTOR through the TWL partnership described at WP:JSTOR . You should have recieved a Wikipedia email User:The Interior or User:Ocaasi sent several weeks ago with instructions for access, including a link to a form collecting information relevant to that access. Please find that email, and follow those instructions. If you were not approved, did not recieve the email, or are having some other concern or question, please respond to this message at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved. Thanks much, Sadads (talk) 21:18, 5 August 2014 (UTC) Note: You are recieving this message from an semi-automatically generated list. If you think you were incorrectly contacted, make sure to note that at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved.

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Piano Concerto (Busoni), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gestalt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

22 June 2012

Removed some old bot-type disambiguation notices. >MinorProphet (talk) 13:39, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

F. Newman Turner

(Moved by MinorProphet to the end of the page)

Goodness! How complicated it is finding ones way round Wikipedia contributors' pages! I hope this message reaches you to thank you for your comprehensive response to my query regarding a new article about F.Newman Turner. As you surmise, it is my first attempt at a proper article (for WP) other than some minor editorial corrections.

As this is a biographical piece, relying on unpublished sources, such as minutes, letters, and diaries in the family archive, it may be difficult to give citations to every statement but I will follow through on your recommendations as far as I can. Also, I was leaving formatting to the final submission process but you have kindly done this in the edit. I shall add the WikiLinks where they are relevant. I will also need to add a photograph, which, presumably, is done following the 'upload images' protocol.

Thanks again and I may well be in need of further help!

Roger Newman Turner 10:21, 22 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roger Newman Turner (talk • contribs)

Hi Roger, welcome to the weird and wonderful world of Wikipedia!

Please add new sections at the end of discussions or user talk pages - just click the "New Section" button on a talk page. To indent further posts when adding to an existing discussion, begin each new paragraph with one or more colons as the first character. Then please sign your name at the end of each post by typing four tildes like this: ~~~~ .

I should point out that diaries and letters are known as primary source material, which is not allowed in references on WP. See WP:VERIFY. Wikipedia requires reliable secondary sources such as printed books, jounals, etc., or the internet in some cases. Although some statements can be flagged like this or like this:2015-6-22 but these tend to detract from an article's overall reliability. I can appreciate the trouble you have taken to write the article, but if there are too many unreferenced statements they will tend to be ruthlessly excised in the early stages. Please add more references to any further reliable sources you can find; it's best to prune heavily, and to present an article for submission with as few un-reffed statements as possible. After the article is approved and makes it to Wikipedia mainspace there tends to be less scrutiny, and various details could be judiciously added without too much trouble, as it were.>MinorProphet (talk) 13:20, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

With suitable references, of course. >MinorProphet (talk) 05:12, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

30 August

Deleted some old dab-type messages >MinorProphet (talk) 09:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Help us improve wikimeets by filling in the UK Wikimeet survey!

Hello! I'm running a survey to identify the best way to notify Wikimedians about upcoming UK wikimeets (informal, in-person social meetings of Wikimedians), and to see if we can improve UK wikimeets to make them accessible and attractive to more editors and readers. All questions are optional, and it will take about 10 minutes to complete. Please fill it in at:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/JJMNVVD

Thanks! Mike Peel (talk) 18:46, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Alfred Karney Young

Hi there. I see you've put together an excellent article in your own user space about Alfred Karney Young, former Chief Justice of Fiji. I was going to write an article about him myself when a search turned up yours. In my opinion, this article is more than ready to go "live" — so please move it to the main article space. You may think it's not "perfect" yet — but no Wikipedia article will ever be. If you need help moving it, you can ask me or any other administrator. Cheers! David Cannon (talk) 12:23, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your encouragement. I tidied it up a bit.  23 September 2015 MinorProphet (talk)

It's looking great! I've added a few cats and links; will do a bit more when I get home from work tonight. Thank you for this article! David Cannon (talk) 01:26, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Just to keep you in the loop: (1) I've moved the page to Alfred Karney Young, because that's what he's generally known as. That's left a broken redirect, which I haven't fixed, because I've gotten into trouble before for editing another editor's user page; (2) I think his father, W. A. G. Young is notable enough to have his own article, so I've spliced that one off. That one needs quite a bit more work, but that can/will come later. (3) Some of his other relatives mentioned in the family tree section might be notable enough for articles of their own, too, but I'm not sure. I'll Google their names tomorrow and see what comes up :-) David Cannon (talk) 12:40, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Sir Richard Ingoldsby (knighted 1617)

Hello MinorProphet. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sir Richard Ingoldsby (knighted 1617), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G7 template in error? this is a mainspace article, and others have contributed. I guess you meant to tag User:MinorProphet/Sir Richard Ingoldsby (knighted 1617), so I have deleted that. JohnCD (talk) 19:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, MinorProphet. You have new messages at Mww113's talk page.
Message added 02:06, 24 September 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mww113 (talk) 02:06, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Opera in Chicago

Hi MinorProphet,

As it is currently written, Opera in Chicago is not a valid disambiguation page. You could rename this page as List of Opera Houses in Chicago to keep the list of opera houses and companies, but it currently fails the guidelines of a disambiguation page at Wikipedia:Disambiguation. Alternatively, you could make a historical article about the history of opera in Chicago. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:10, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

 Done MinorProphet (talk) 11:15, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

Thank you for your recent articles, including Jean Vesque de Puttelange, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

Thank you for your recent articles, including Jean Vesque de Puttelange, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia email re Newspapers.com signup

Hello, MinorProphet. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

HazelAB (talk) 17:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Academy 1-2-3 (cinema)

Outstanding work on Academy 1-2-3 (cinema). You've inspired me to start George Hoellering and Ivo Jarosy. Edwardx (talk) 11:49, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Arnaldo Conti/Conti sources

A tag has been placed on Arnaldo Conti/Conti sources requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:27, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, MinorProphet. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 20:08, 11 March 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stefan2 (talk) 20:08, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Fred Lanchester

Hi MP, I am no expert on Lanchester but two things do concern me: Grace's Guide is not always reliable and, I have corrected it, the idea that the Daimler-Knight engine was a waste of time. It was a commercial success for 25 years before Daimler acknowledged that advances made with other valve systems had outmoded it. Perhaps sounder citations might be found than Grace's. Eddaido (talk) 03:28, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments, Eddaido. Much of the info I used from the Grace's Guide articles is relatively well-referenced, I can substitute the original sources if you like, and I'll try to hunt down to better cites. The negative comments about the double sleeve-valve are actually Ricardo's, taken directly from the Royal Society obituary article. Perhaps they would be better off in double quotes. Ricardo was a proponent of the single sleeve-valve engine, which continued to power aircraft from the early 1930s until the jet era. MinorProphet (talk) 04:14, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Perhaps Ricardo is more famous than Lanchester but feelings do creep in to histories don't they. I'll have a look a the Grace's Guide citations in the same way. Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 04:17, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

6 April 2016

Removed old dab messages. MinorProphet (talk) 12:29, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alfred Austin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ''The Human Tragedy: A Poem''], Hardwicke (London), revised edition, Blackwood (Edinburgh) 1876], new revised edition, Macmillan (London) 1889.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)  Done

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nut (hardware), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wing nut. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 30 May 2016 (UTC) Done

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward Steinkopff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frankfort. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Beethoven's Funeral for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beethoven's Funeral is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beethoven's Funeral until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 01:48, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Beethoven's Funeral

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Beethoven's Funeral, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 01:49, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Horch, horch, die Lerch') has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Horch, horch, die Lerch', MinorProphet!

Wikipedia editor Ymblanter just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thaks for the great article, but please do not forget to add categories in the future.

To reply, leave a comment on Ymblanter's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Your question at the Help desk

	Hello MinorProphet. Replies have been posted to your question at the Help desk. If the problem is solved, please place {{Resolved|1=~~~~}} at the top of the section. Thank you!
	Message added on 23:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{helpdeskreply}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of alloys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kanthal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 10 October 2016 (UTC) Done

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MinorProphet. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

9 January 2017

Well, the last message aimed specifically at me was on 10 October 2016, which means I have kept my nose utterly clean for three whole months. Not even a "Did you mean xxxx"....?-type-bot, so hurrah for me for checking (or guessing correctly) every single WL wot I did do for 90 days. Thanks @DPL bot:, you taught me in the end. ????... hmmm, close, I meant ~~~~ , MinorProphet (talk) 05:48, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of alloys. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:01, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

25 January 2017

Oops.

Page moves

Please don't play silly games with page moves. Pinkbeast (talk) 09:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

OK >MinorProphet (talk) 02:00, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Non-free image use

Hi MinorProphet. The licensing of each image you see on Wikipedia is determined by its copyright status and not every image file you see on Wikipedia is licensed the same. Some files are licensed as public domain or licensed under a free licensed suitable for Wikipedia and these are often collectively referred to as "free images". Other files are licensed as non-free content because of their copyright status and these file are commonly referred to as "non-free images". Non-free image use is highly restricted and each use of such an an image must satisfy Wikipedia's non-free content use policy. One of these restrctions is WP:NFCC#9, which says that non-free content can only be used in the article namespace. Non-free content should not be used on usepages or their subpages as explained in WP:UP#Non-free files which is why I have removed File:Arnoldo Conti.jpg from User:MinorProphet/Draft subpages/Maurice Grau. Actually, I didn't remove it in the traditional sense of the word; I instead converted it to a link which is allowed by relevant policy. Anyway, perhaps you did not notice the edit sum I left the first time I "removed" the image, so I'm posting this here to provide more explanation. Please do not re-display this file again because doing so is clearly in violation of relevant Wikipedia policy. If you have any questions about this, you can ask for help at WP:MCQ or WT:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:02, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Noted, thanks. Y

A page you started (UJM (disambiguation)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating UJM (disambiguation), MinorProphet!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating this useful disambiguation page!

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 18:22, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your wiki intervention

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		This Barnstar is awarded to Minor Prophet whose kind act arrived just in time to prevent a wikibreakdown. I had found myself working on three huge wikipedia article at the same time, surrounded by 30 or 40 books, 3 or 4 photo and 33mm slide albums and talking to my computer in a way that made even my dog concerned about me. In the middle of my yelling “No more, no more!” I got a message that I had a wikimessage and I screamed “NO, no, no, no” but clicked on it anyway and it was Minor Prophet with an unsolicited solution to a formatting problem that I had posted about a day or so ago. It made me pause, realize that it was 1:30 in the afternoon and I had not eaten breakfast, which made me realize that wikipedia would do just fine if I took a break. So I did. After breakfast/lunch I repaired the tattered dust jackets on two books before reshelving them, I put away two dozen other references and am about to just leave the house for some sort of short trip. But first, this thanks. Carptrash (talk) 20:32, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Precious

musical references

Thank you for quality articles around film and music not only in minor, such as Ufa-Pavillon am Nollendorfplatz, Piano Concerto (Busoni) and List of compositions by César Franck, for explaining the joy of sfn, for gnomish help, for the links between "your" articles made visible, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:11, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Not "mine", but everyone's, for free. Keep the flame burning. MinorProphet (talk) 22:18, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

I am open to a better wording, put it in quotation marks to indicate it's not "your articles" ;) - I'd have a hard time to arrange "mine" in such a neat flow, because the filling of red links in one here, somewhere else the next day, doesn't lead to such logical order. Today, it was an opera. Tomorrow, it will be a vocalist, both related to former work, but not to each other. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Beethoven's funeral

Now *that* looks like a worthwhile article (I do trust that you are not thinking of listing all the mourners?). FWIW, I just did a rummage through German Wiki, and found nothing except the tiny mentions at the end of his biography and in de:Währinger Schubertpark.

Congrats on getting that award from Gerda - you're now entitled to add {{Precious topicon}} to your Main Page.

Now, back to my C13 Galician troubadour (articles in six non-English Wikis, 19 WP:RS-looking citations and counting...). Narky Blert (talk) 21:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

I am indeed honoured. "Not thinking of listing them all?" Well, yes actually, I am: I've got almost the entire crowd, the whole kit and caboodle save four, and some good descriptions of the actual funeral itself.

"Dad, who was the first person to fly?" my daughter asked many moons ago. Since then I have been spasmodically collating an annotated list of every single person mentioned in the various contemporary accounts, and there are only four out of seventy-five principal people who I have completely failed to identify (all 'minor' Hofkapelle singers in the choir): plus two slightly unlikely (yet possible) trombonists; and a solo tenor who could be father or son, but probably the father.

29 already have articles on WP:en, 6 on WP:de, and 40 have no entry. Obviously some are very well-known and some are very unimportant (historically speaking), but everyone has least one WP:RS confirming their existence - if my identifications are correct. The really fun bit has been trying to identify 75 people from early 19th-century Vienna from just a surname in a list. Plus at some 15 other names with less immediate connection with Beethoven, making some 90 names in all.

It's been fascinating to find out the various connections between all these people, and to realise what a close, tight-knit society it was where everyone knew almost everyone else. Also how much other music was being written and played (apart from the classical greats) which you normally simply never get to hear. And a weird, particularly Viennese death cult.

Ah, plus the three Equales WoO 30 for four trombones played at the funeral, with their own history of the MS, original performance of two at the funeral, and publishing history not unlike D. 635. Apropos of which Rudolf Weis-Ostborn was the first publisher of the music, but with the new words. This why the 1900 Ries & Erler edition is not listed in Deutsch (if I have understood correctly): it wasn't done from the original manuscript, but from Schubert's own MS (crossed-out) arrangement which Rudolf W-O owned. The original autograph MS only appeared at auction in 1901, thus Mandyczewski's 1906-7 edition in Die Musik (if I am correct in my thinking). And so the link to Beethoven's death-bed, where Weis-Ostborn's great-uncle snipped off a lock of B's hair. The Anselm Hüttenbrenner article badly needs tidying on the way... Corragio! Eh bien, quoi? En marche! Allons, enfants de l'Encyclopedie!

Notes

MinorProphet (talk) 14:21, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Aequales

Thank you for your e-mail. I'm glad you found the translation helpful. It's always nice to know that something I've done has been useful, and I don't mind long letters.

On reflection, I think the word "suitably" in my translation might not be justifiable. Regarding your footnote i/f; as you know, I didn't actually translate the word "Blasinstrumente" (I'm afraid I had to translate pretty freely, due to the dramatically different grammatical styles; the original German is only two sentences, one quite short!). I sort of assume that "blasenden Trauermusik" means mourning music played by an alta capella, especially if the same group was expected to announce the death from the tower. Would making the words "wind instruments" a link to alta capella perhaps be suitable?

Baroque trombones (sometimes called sackbuts) used in Beethoven's funeral may have looked more like this, with a smaller, more conical bell.

If you haven't already seen them (you seem very through), I recommend Collegium Musicum, Moravian Church music, and Sackbut#Symbolism for further cultural background (I wrote large parts of the last). I was going to contact the Moravian Music Foundation (e-mail addresses) and ask about sources; apparently they have archives dating back to the period in which you are interested, with an emphasis upon trombone music and an area near Vienna. I never got around to it, though.

I'd love to see your content on equales merged with the equale article. The article currently has nothing pre-beethoven, and almost nothing about anything but trombone choir equales, serious holes. A longer list of works would also be good.

I'm also fascinated by your mention of antiphonal tower music. We have antiphonal trombone choirs from 17th-century St. Mark's in Venice, and traditions of alta capella, Stadtpfeifer, waits, Neujahrblasen, wassailing; it would be interesting to know how these traditions fit together. Lists of works would also be wonderful here.

Thank you for your work. I will look forward to seeing it in the article space. HLHJ (talk) 02:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)  1 October 2017

@HLHJ: Thanks for your comprehensive and encouraging reply. I'll make your suggested link to alta cappella, I agree with your understanding of "blasenden Trauermusik". Although I really enjoy it, accurate German translation can be really difficult, as Mark Twain knew.

Also thank you for the link and other WLs, I'll have a look. The picture above will look great. I suspect that pictures of assembled trombone players of the Moravian community in the US give some idea of its importance. I'll attempt a merge of the Equale section as you suggest. MinorProphet (talk) 13:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)  1 October 2017

Copying from sources

Hi! I've undone your addition to Equale, for several reasons of which the only strong one is this: it simply is not acceptable to copy material from other published sources. So if this source contains the sentence "Such designations have often been translated and understood as 'equal voices'… ", we just cannot write "Such designations have often been translated and understood as 'equal voices', … " in our article here. If you think there may be anywhere else where you have borrowed directly from your sources, please remove the copied material as a matter of priority (rewriting afterwards if you so wish, of course). Thank you!

That said, I'm far from convinced that a generalised discourse on equal-voiced music belongs in our article on a very minor niche genre – perhaps this could be discussed? And while I'm here I might as well remind you that changing the established referencing system of an article without discussion is discouraged. Sorry! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

@Justlettersandnumbers: Thank you for reminding me of various WP rules. I normally try to make a précis of recently-published source material, I'll make your suggested changes and be more careful in future. If you don't feel that the section belongs in the Equale article (and I agree with your reasoning and remarks about referencing), maybe you can suggest some other article where it might belong, (suitably emended, of course)? Or maybe it could become a stand-alone article. Thanks for your welcome input. >MinorProphet (talk) 02:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. For what it's worth, I think a stand-alone page on, say, Music for equal voices would be a more appropriate – and valuable – use of the material. I read Carey's article, and see essentially no connection at all between his topic and the trombone repertoire of Linz. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:24, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7