Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Shearonink (talk) 15:22, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 12:19, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@SNUGGUMS All right, I'll make sure to put an editorial summary next time. Melonsida (talk) 12:25, 10 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please use edit summaries

edit

  Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Spideog (talk) 19:15, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your edits require citations

edit

Wikipedia requires that edits are supported by citations to provide verification. I notice in this edit you added information without including a citation to verify its credibility. Please read Wikipedia's requirements for reliable sources. Also, the article describing how to include them is also helpful.

I notice in this edit you removed information that was verified by citation. This cannot be done with no explanation, and you also removed the citations supporting the text you deleted. This should never be done without providing a compelling reason and with discussion of why your change is better – with verification from reliable sources.

Please read the three Help articles (linked above) which will introduce you to essential requirements for editing to avoid having your work undone, as I have done to one of your edits, because you changed a fact in an article which was not supported by its original accompanying reference. Thank you. Spideog (talk) 19:53, 25 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

November 2024

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at R. O. Kwon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 17:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Melonsida,
Do not remove categories from an article that are accurate simply because you disapprove. Wikipedia is not censored, especially when content is reliably sourced. This borders on vandalism so please focus on constructive editing.
If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia or categories, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 17:34, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Frank Peterson

edit

Hello @Melonsida, I've now twice reverted your edits on the Frank Peterson page. In my first revert, I left an edit summary in which I asked you to explain your reason for changing Peterson's birth date. You ignored this and proceeded to change it once more, again without bothering to leave an edit summary. These are not optional on Wikipedia, and if you continue to make unexplained, seemingly random edits without bothering to adhere to WP rules or reading comments left for you by other users, you may end up receiving a warning. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 01:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Revirvlkodlaku I edited it like that because the German Wikipedia says December 20th on Google. I'll upload the edit summary again. Melonsida (talk) 01:18, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ok, but you may only change it if the date is properly referenced. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 01:20, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

December 2024

edit

Please stop doing this. The categories are used for people who themselves confirmed their sexual preference. Nothing of that kind ever took place with her. SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:44, 28 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

@SergeWoodzing I thought Greta Garbo was LGBT. Sorry. Melonsida (talk) 16:50, 28 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

January 2025

edit

  Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. — Gor1995 𝄞 12:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Gor1995 I thought Tchaikovsky was gay. Sorry. Melonsida (talk) 12:33, 8 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
You removed the category "Russian LGBTQ composers" and added categories "Russian Gay musicions" (it has a typo, do doesn't exist) and "Gay composers". Why delete the first one? — Gor1995 𝄞 12:39, 8 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Gor1995 I think Tchaikovsky was gay. How about keeping Russian LGBTQ composers as they are and adding Russian Gay musicions and Gay composers? Melonsida (talk) 12:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)Reply