User talk:MelbourneStar/Archive 24

Archive 20

←

Archive 22

Archive 23

Archive 24

Archive 25

Archive 26

→

Archive 30

Edit Wikipedia Page - Arctic

Hi,

I recived a few days ago messages from you about my changes to Arctic SA page (https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Arctic_S.A.):

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Arctic S.A.  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar☆talk 07:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Arctic S.A.. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆talk 07:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Arctic S.A. with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —MelbourneStar☆talk 07:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

I want to update information because I am involved in Arctic activity and I guarantee this information are updated and accurate about the company. Can you please help me to make this changes and tell me what are the steps?

Best regards, Adrian — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrian bucuresti (talk • contribs) 11:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,

I recived a few days ago messages from you about my changes to Arctic SA page (https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Arctic_S.A.):

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Arctic S.A. with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar☆talk 07:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Arctic S.A.. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆talk 07:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Arctic S.A. with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —MelbourneStar☆talk 07:40, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

I want to update information because I am involved in Arctic activity and I guarantee this information are updated and accurate about the company. Can you please help me to make this changes and tell me what are the steps? Best regards, Adrian Adrian bucuresti (talk) 11:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi @Adrian bucuresti: welcome to Wikipedia!

I've had to undo a lot of your edits on the Arctic S.A. article, as it contained a lot of promotional material seemingly advertising the subject of the article. I'll pin-point some of the concerns I have, and I'll also suggest what you can do to assist with your editing:

• This edit, for example, contains material that appears to be unsourced (ie. there are no reliable sources cited to verify the content). If you were to add such content to the article, it will need to include verifiable reliable sources which are independent of Arctic S.A. (and therefore more likely to be neutral).
• The latter edit, is also written in a non-neutral point of view. In Wikipedia articles, it is important that content is written in a neutral point of view in order to avoid biasness, and adveritising/promotion. If you are closely connected to the subject of the article, it may be best you read this before you proceed to editing said article.
• Please ensure the content you are adding to the article is written in your own words and not copy and pasted, especially without permission.
• Whilst a small issue, it is still important to always use edit summaries, in order to explain your edits adequately.

I hope this answers your questions!

All the best, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 03:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Netflix

Netflix and chill is a massive thing in pop culture at the moment do you not agree? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.171.163.158 (talk) 00:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Without a verifiable reliable source and some context, I disagree. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 03:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

I hope to be able to help with Australian writer information. I have a particular problem with the biographical information of the wikipedia subject "Tara June Winch" The entire bio needs re-writing the problem is just that half the information is incorrect.Australianauthors (talk) 13:36, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

vandal 216.234.53.243

Greetings. I just stumbled across the damage this silly vandal has been spreading across WP for years: 216.234.53.243

You threatened action in June 2015. Please follow through and do something! I will try to repair the Population article, but I don't have the energy to try to track down all of the damage they have done and reverse it...-71.174.188.32 (talk) 19:37, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Hiiiiii

I received an email from melbourne star regarding an article on Gangwar caste , Now this time i have again edited it and i have also mentioned the source of my knowledge , and one very important thing we know gangwar is a obc caste bt my friend obc status is given on the basis of economic condition take example of yadava's, but originally gangwar is a kshatriya clan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.236.49.57 (talk) 15:36, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Hiiiiii

This time i have again edited the article on Gangwar and i have also mentioned the source of my knowledge , we all know gangwar is a obc caste but my friend obc quota is given on the basis of economic condition not on the basis of lower caste take example of yadav's they are also obc caste but they are not lower caste , If u will read my source of my knowledge u will agree with it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.236.49.57 (talk) 15:40, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings!

Hello MelbourneStar: Enjoy the holiday season and upcoming winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:31, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Merry Christmas

	Merry Christmas!!
	Hello, I wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year, Thanks for all your help on the 'pedia!    –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 17:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Parramatta and Sydney

How about you using your head a little bit? Clarification is not needed. Everyone I spoke to knows Sydney as the city, the state capital and not the Downtown area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.154.89.30 (talk) 14:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

@59.154.89.30: Everyone you spoke to = original research, a big no-no on Wikipedia. Parramatta is in Sydney's metro – not CBD the difference is pretty big, and putting them in the same category is careless.

How about you try and be civil instead of not assuming good faith? Hope Santa got you those virtues for Christmas! —MelbourneStar☆^talk 07:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your wishes and i hope Santa got you a new pair of glasses. You started to revert my edits first ;). As for the article, I'm sure you recall that i wrote Sydney and not Sydney CBD. Intact if you go to the Sydney disambiguation page, you will that Sydney refers to the whole city and not the CBD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.154.89.30 (talk) 15:23, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Actually, it was your edit that prompted the edit war in the first place, so if you want to play the blame game, get your mirror out. That needs clarification, because if you bothered checking List of tallest buildings in Sydney you would know that article refers to buildings in Sydney's CBD – not metropolitan. Hence why the clarification on the Parramatta article is warranted. Of course, the value of 'forethought' can be next year's present from Santa? now please find something productive to do other than being incredibly uncivil – yes, that translates to: please stay off my talk page. Regards, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 02:17, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Julia Gillard, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stephen Smith and George Bush. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Bishop/airport screening incident

Hi MelbourneStar,

The incident that took place at Melbourne Airport is significant in the sense that one of the Government ministers got directly involved in an action conducted by airport security. The story was reported by several newspapers in Australia and abroad. The power to investigate acts done or omitted by authority with respect to matter of administration is not, if I am not mistaken, one given to any minister. For this reason, it appears that some of the Government members wrongly took actions, which resulted in the suspension of security staff. Hence, as the discomfort felt by Ms Bishop for being subjected to security screening is the origin of the Ministry's intervention, it is absolutely relevant that reports of the incident would be found on her page. I would appreciate if you could stop deleting it as it is not trivial when it comes to the respect of administrative authority by government members, an essential element of any functional state. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.234.159.65 (talk) 09:36, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

@212.234.159.65: you may discuss this incident here – as I'm not the only editor who disagrees with its inclusion (and still very much do). Bishop's response to the matter is unclear; she has not been reprimanded in any shape or form; and lastly: the security staffer was suspended (a staffer whom is not notable anyway). Stop including said content in article, until you discuss and reach consensus on the article's talk page for its inclusion. Regards, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 09:46, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Complaint about your edits at WP:AN3

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MelbourneStar reported by User:212.234.159.65 (Result: ). You may respond there if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 20:50, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Never mind, I see you already reported the same thing. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 20:56, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

@EdJohnston: Thank you for swiftly dealing with said IP.

Regarding the contentious BLP content on the Julie Bishop article, I'm removing it per WP:3RRBLP#7. Kind regards, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 04:57, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, MelbourneStar!

Happy New Year!

MelbourneStar,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:12, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

@Liz: Thank you very much, and I hope you have a wonderful 2016! Bless, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 07:42, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, MelbourneStar!

Happy New Year!

MelbourneStar,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 11:17, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

@Davey2010: Thank you! I wish you a great 2016 too! —MelbourneStar☆^talk 11:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome and thank you :), Have a great day :), –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 12:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Julia Gillard-Thank you

Visited the Gillard page for the first time in a while and it's much improved thanks to you. I can't believe how well it has been fleshed out.Hollth (talk) 10:25, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

@Hollth: Thank you, that means a lot! Kind regards, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 22:38, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Dear MelbourneStar,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").

I didnt edit ivan milats wiki page.

Received a message from you saying i edited Ivan Milats wiki page, i have no recollection of this, i saw that the edit was "he farted then shit on a bench", anyway i wasn't even logged in to Wikipedia so i don't know how you sent me a message. If you're 100% sure it came from this computer then i apologise, for either a friend must of done it or i did it a very long time ago, anyway thanks for making the edit. Actually now seeing that it was in may, no i didnt do it.

78.26's RFA Appreciation award

	The 78.26 RFA Appreciation award
	Thank you for the participation and support at my RFA. It is truly appreciated. I hope to be of further help around here, and if you see me doing something dumb, you know where to find me. Again, I thank you. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 24:42, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Hillary Clinton Email Controversy

The edit's I made on the Hillary Clinton Email Controversy page, was not defamatory or speculation. I clearly cited my sources, and while she has not yet gone to court, this is what she is being accused of, and these are the laws she may or may not have broken. I am not a vandal, and trying to censor the truth is wrong. I don't care whether you feel she is guilty or not, this is what she is accused of. Innocent until guilty am I right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekiph (talk • contribs) 23:34, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

@Ekiph: You are operating under a few assumptions: namely – that Clinton is the subject of the probe, instead of the State department's handling of classified content; that Clinton has been charged, that Clinton is before a court, and should she be found guilty she will be convicted. That's 5 different assumptions, all speculation and completely unsourced and an absolute violation of our WP:BLP policy, specifically WP:PUBLICFIGURE – where you are unable to find any reliable 3rd party sources (yes, that does exclude Fox News and any other conservative media outlets that already has a set opinion and is not reliable). Cease this, otherwise I will report you for said violations. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 03:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Julia Gillard

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Julia Gillard you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Fremantle99 -- Fremantle99 (talk) 05:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

@Fremantle99: Thank you, I look forward to your findings. Kind regards, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 05:24, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Safe deposit boxes

Hi, I got your message regarding safe deposit boxes, which is the correct term. The misuse of safety deposit boxes comes from people mishearing safe deposit ...when run together, it sounds like safedeposit, but the brain will reconstruct to safety deposit. A safe deposit box is a deposit box kept in a safe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.156.226.197 (talk) 03:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi,

I think that is best to be discussed here — rather than within the article itself, as it seems inapropriate to confuse the readers by saying in the lead sentence: "X, incorrectly known as Y". Hence, please discuss said edit on the article talk page. Best, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 04:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

ADA v ACC

So this is about 5 years late, but I just saw your message [[1]] here. In NYC the difference between an ADA and an Assistant Corporation Counsel is simply that an ADA prosecutes criminal cases, and Corporation Counsel handles civil cases involving the City of New York. Tufflaw (talk) 19:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

@Tufflaw: Thank you for your response – and hey: better late, than never! There's been a lot more ACC's of recent on the series I was talking to you about, so I've managed to get an idea. Nevertheless, your explanation hits the nail on the head, so thank you! —MelbourneStar☆^talk 01:36, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Clinton image

I've created a discussion at Template talk:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016#Image. Please don't change the image until a consensus is reached. MB298 (talk) 01:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Shall participate. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 01:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Dude.

Sorry. I didn't mean to insult other editors, I just wanted to inform them that Wikipedia is not censored. There can be swear words throughout the encyclopedia, but they will not be removed unless they are irrelevant to the article. I was a bit too self-demonstrating of swear words in my summary. However, my edit was good-mannered. Zakawer (talk) 17:09, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

@Zakawer: Your edit was certainly appropriate, granted. But it was your edit summary which was ill-mannered. The editor you reverted is a new user, and swearing at people (new or not) and name-calling is just not the atmosphere we want to uphold on this project. Your edit could have still managed the same good, without the added name-calling. Nevertheless: good on you for taking responsibility. Wish you all the best, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 08:16, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Oh, and I was not trying to insult the editor, I was trying to explain that editors shouldn't censor swear words on Wikipedia. Therefore, I became too self-demonstrating in my summary, if not too insulting, man. Zakawer (talk) 09:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

User talk:58.111.177.23

You have left a message for my ip address. I read Wikipedia frequently. I don't edit Wikipedia and have no idea what you are talking about. So feel free to block my editing privileges as you say you will as long as I can continue to read Wikipedia. Thanks. The ip address your note was addressed to was 58.111.177.23. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.111.177.23 (talk • contribs)

Hi @58.111.177.23: You may have a shared IP address, or it may be a public IP address. Nevertheless, you will not lose your editing privileges, as those warnings were made for edits almost 5 years ago. All the best, continue reading, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 12:43, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daniel Zovatto, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stephen Graham and Season one. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Julia Gillard

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Julia Gillard you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Montanabw -- Montanabw (talk) 07:20, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

@Montanabw: thank you!

I look forward to your review, whatever the outcome may be. Kind regards, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 07:35, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Hey, pinging... wasn't sure if you were going to make more edits based on my suggestions, saw you did some good work, are you ready for me to re-review or do you want to do a bit more first? Let me know at the Talk:Julia Gillard/GA3 page. Montanabw^(talk) 07:58, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Julia Gillard

The article Julia Gillard you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Julia Gillard for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Montanabw -- Montanabw (talk) 18:01, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Wonderful! thank you, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 02:35, 22 May 2016 (UTC)