User talk:MariusM/Heaven of Transnistria
Latest comment: 17 years ago by El C in topic Deletion
This page was nominated for deletion on 25 April 2007. The result of the discussion was No consensus--RELIST. |
Deletion attempt
editIf this page was deleted from Wikipedia, why is it still residing on a Wikipedia.org server? - Mauco 19:22, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- This is a sandbox. Please don't edit here.--MariusM 20:20, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- No, it is not. It is a violation of WP:USER and shall be reported if you do not take action to rectify your behavior. - Mauco 20:35, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- The deletion attempt of Mauco was disscussed here.--MariusM 03:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- No, it is not. It is a violation of WP:USER and shall be reported if you do not take action to rectify your behavior. - Mauco 20:35, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Suggestion
editI also suggest inserting the following template: {{Workpage}} into the draft. --Illythr 14:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- I consider factual the infos in this page, even if is still a draft and it need improvements before incorporating in Wikipedia articles.--MariusM 20:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- If you don't like the text in the template, you can subst and reword it. Point is, nobody should confuse this page with a Wikipedia article. The subpage is first in the google hitlist [1] (apparently, you can be credited with the invention of the phrase), so I insist that it be clearly marked as a sandbox/draft. --Illythr 01:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
FPS improvements suggestions
editFuture Perfect at Sunrise made some changes in the article [2] which were meantime reverted. This talk page is the place for improvement proposals. Few thoughts about FPS edit:
- Giving a quote of 2-3 sentences from somebody, mentioning the name of the person quoted is not plagiarism. Plagiarism is when you try to present somebody else ideas as your own ideas.
- Some fact tags are inappropiate, you need just to go to the sites and see the info is correct. However, in some situations the idea of exact refference is good.--MariusM 17:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Deletion
editThe deletion debate was wrongly closed as "delete", while it was no consensus with majority of participants voting for keep. I've asked the closing admin for a review of the debate [3]--MariusM 12:42, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- I, indeed, reviewed it, but as a debate — not a "vote." You and/or some participants may have thought it was a vote, but that was illusory. El_C 09:33, 13 May 2007 (UTC)