User talk:MIDI/2014

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Southcote Lock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southcote (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Highclere, Kingsclere and Basingstoke Light Railway

Hello! Your submission of Highclere, Kingsclere and Basingstoke Light Railway at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CeeGee 11:37, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Rename of Infobox lock

Just edited County Lock and was surprised that one of the side effects of my edit was to redlink the infobox template. Digging further, I found that you had moved the template into user space. As there were no explanatory comments, I assumed this was an error and reverted your move. But looking even further, I see that all this is fairly recent and maybe was deliberate. Please feel free to remove, but could you please remove all references to the template in article space first, otherwise we end up with a bit of a mess. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 20:31, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Digging a little further, I've discovered there is already a Template:Infobox waterlock, which probably should be used. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 20:43, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Yep, that's why I reverted. All my hard work before finding the existing infobox! That's why I pulled it out of use as soon as I noticed. I'd only put the 'new' template on 3 pages (so not much to revert). If I get the chance I'll look to merging some of the new bits into the existing infobox (particularly formatting). Thanks for the message. matt (talk) 00:26, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

All my hard work before finding the existing infobox. Know the feeling. :-( Thanks for fixing it up. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 13:45, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Wellingtonia Avenue

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, MIDI. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Main_Page/Errors#Errors_in_the_current_or_next_Did_you_know....
Message added 11:09, 12 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

And here. Once again, thanks for catching it. Matty.007 11:09, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Julián Ladera

Sorry for the confusion. When I approved it, I was reading it in the sense of "Julián Ladera was born in a town that is now a ghost village". If you'll read the whole discussion (perhaps you have; I'm sorry if I'm telling you what you already know), you'll see that the place was destroyed by the Vargas tragedy of 1999, and you'll also see that I was completely unaware of the situation (originally rejecting parts of the article because I misunderstood what had happened) until someone had to give me a link to the tragedy and explain how it was relevant. Nyttend (talk) 14:38, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Highclere, Kingsclere and Basingstoke Light Railway

The DYK project (nominate) 09:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Airport (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New wave (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Firefly Communications for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Firefly Communications is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firefly Communications until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:27, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Busonga

The article Busonga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notable enough to have article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aha... (talk) 18:30, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dol Dol

The article Dol Dol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Significance of subject not explained and why it is notable to be on Wikipedia

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aha... (talk) 13:59, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Book

Not sure how familiar you actually are with musical's but a Book in the infobox or talked about in a musical article is the book of the musical. It is not referring at all to the show being based on a book. Every musical has a book.Blethering Scot 17:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Yup, my bad. I was only skim reading—must be these late nights I'm currently having (yes, you guessed it—working on a musical of all things). matt (talk) 22:29, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Back to the Future (musical)

Orlady (talk) 04:32, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

key

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNNCRzT_9vE&feature=kp

This song is in F major or G-flat major ? 166.48.184.66 (talk) 23:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

As with previous questions (like this one from December), it's somewhere between F major and F♯ (or G♭) major. It isn't definitely one or the other—the reason for this being the same explanation as before. Happy to help! matt (talk) 13:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCXTF6pQQR0
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OONN6n8RVI
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ysU1xqCcD0

These three songs use this key too ? 166.48.173.20 (talk) 02:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Yep. matt (talk) 08:46, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_HPgKQqjEk

This song is in G-flat major or E-flat minor ? 166.48.169.109 (talk) 02:44, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

E♭ minor. matt (talk) 08:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

But in 0:48, it's in G♭ major ? 166.48.180.136 (talk) 17:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Stale drafts

Hi, I stumbled across User:Mattgirling/Theale, Berkshire. Because of WP:STALEDRAFT, this ought to be blanked or deleted. As you're both active here and an admin, you probably need no further help to review your user sub-pages and do what's needed, so over to you! Best wishes, – Fayenatic London 20:43, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, you may have been too busy to bother with this, so I blanked that one and tagged another with {{user draft}}. No offence intended. Please review your other sub-pages that look like articles. – Fayenatic London 10:07, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

key

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Jfd62PvX4w

This song is in which key ? It's very hard to tell. 166.48.198.52 (talk) 19:13, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi. I'm sorry but I can't keep helping with these questions. It may be worth reading up on topics such as relative pitch and the A440 pitch standard. I have previously explained why these examples don't fall into one key or another if using standard A440 tuning. matt (talk) 15:11, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nigel Clark, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SFG (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Completely over the top protection on Rik Mayall. After a minor spate of IP daft edits no one can now edit the article except Admins. Ridiculous!

See above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.6.11.20 (talk) 15:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Steady on! The full protection was accidental; please see User talk:Bencherlite#Rik Mayall. matt (talk) 15:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited At the Sign of the Swingin' Cymbal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Radio Luxembourg and Brian Fahey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mashamba

The article Mashamba has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Couldn't establish notability of farm

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:23, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sylvia (Focus song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Vernon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Avoncliff Aqueduct

Thanks for your edit to Avoncliff Aqueduct but I wasn't sure if your edit summary was a question "Can standard craft (for that navigation) pass on the aqueduct"? If so yes narrowboats etc on the K&A can pass over it, but the River Avon beneath it can only be navigated by canoes etc.— Rod ^talk 14:21, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, Rod—my summary was quoting the infobox documentation, which says that that particular field should give info on the craft (i.e. narrowboats) travelling over the aqueduct; as they are able to travel over it I changed it to "yes". Hope this makes sense! matt (talk) 14:24, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Oh, Oklahoma , oh .

Oklahoma - politicians try's medium, such executions and disclosure of the details in the press, the people of the State of Oklahoma,

intimidate as well as 

guests, anjagen fear.

Potential criminals deterred? 

Seksuele offenses bow? Quellsam dying condemned

to so-called 'US - 

WHOI> send? To their family

members, former friends or
acquaintances zufälige to 

"the father God" with nightmares

come at night? 

The will hear voices "of Allah", "Jesus" or "Buddha"? Never Again breaking the law? If the population of Oklahoma

believes that it is possible to use the exploit successes of medicine and isoteric Kentnise for the punishment of criminals, executions ...

If the European, more humane experience, preventive effect on potential criminals, delinquents, social parasites, as well as prisoners

in Gefängnise, as well as competitors on the labor market, so-called asylum - seekers. Federal or Local Kortikosteroida - programs for the

systematic, secret but humane elimination of risk of serious sexual offenses, social unrest, mass protests. This is also good for the

reduction of competition in the labor market by the illegal, semi-legal, unwanted, foreign workers and migrants. Kortikosteroida - Program is

here for many years. Under the guise of charity, especially Christiche help to the needy.Exestieren great positive experience. No objections

from the public, the press or foreign governments! 

Because,-"Jesus tolerated and for us to leave that!"

Europe-wide support and understanding. In particular, the States, as large Preachers of Christian values worldwide. Mattgirling23 (talk) 16:33, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

File:EastsideCityPark.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EastsideCityPark.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:36, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Steinway Vertegrand

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Saw the DYK and enjoyed your article—a worthy contribution. Being an American, I had never heard of Mrs. Mills, though I was certainly around during her heyday. I'll have to seek out her oeuvre. Deor (talk) 22:31, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Stephen Lawrence.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stephen Lawrence.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:24, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Non-free use of File:Stephen Lawrence.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Stephen Lawrence.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:45, 15 December 2014 (UTC)