Ljason821
Joined 24 June 2016
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Jmcgnh in topic Ry Armstrong
This is Ljason821's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ry Armstrong (December 8)
edit Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Missvain were:
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ry Armstrong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ry Armstrong, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Ljason821!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Missvain (talk) 19:43, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
|
Ry Armstrong
editI looked that that NY Post article you had used as a reference earlier. If you look at it, you see it is most likely a press release from Ryco, not an independent piece of journalism, despite there being a byline. I think the editor removing is as an 'unreliable' source was being a bit strong, but it is indeed not a source we can use for establishing notability. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 01:58, 7 January 2022 (UTC)