Your submission at Articles for creation: Ry Armstrong (December 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Missvain were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Missvain (talk) 19:43, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Ljason821! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Missvain (talk) 19:43, 8 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ry Armstrong

edit

I looked that that NY Post article you had used as a reference earlier. If you look at it, you see it is most likely a press release from Ryco, not an independent piece of journalism, despite there being a byline. I think the editor removing is as an 'unreliable' source was being a bit strong, but it is indeed not a source we can use for establishing notability. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 01:58, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Reply