Letupwasp

Welcome!

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Letupwasp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to 2017 in North Korea‎. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 12:44, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Alert

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

— Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 14:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please remove the challenged material you re-added here[1] per the page level sanctions. --DHeyward (talk) 18:05, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

January 2018

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

To enforce an arbitration decision and for violating the sanctions already in place, specifically you did not get the required consensus before repeatedly restoring a challenged edit on the page Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2020, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 22:30, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Unclear edit?

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The old text was needlessly repetitious,and forgot the link between Corker and McCaskill.12.144.5.2 (talk) 00:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

List of United States Supreme Court Justices by time in office

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

You can update the counting by clicking on the * tab at the top of the page; this will WP:PURGE the server cache, causing the page to recalculate without having to save a WP:NULLEDIT or WP:DUMMY edit. postdlf (talk) 23:58, 16 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I don't see that tab. Could it be something only administrators see? Letupwasp (talk) 00:38, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

You should be able to turn it on in the gadget section of your preferences; scroll down to the "Appearance" section, check the box next to "Add a "Purge" option to the top of the page, which purges the page's cache", and then save. postdlf (talk) 01:49, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

That worked, thank you! Letupwasp (talk) 02:09, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Note

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:12, 8 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

August 2018

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Special Counsel investigation (2017–present). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

I trust I won't see you on User talk:173.73.10.191 again. The editor had a right to remove your messages; restoring them is disruptive and continuing to post there can count as harassment. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 03:36, 3 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please comment on Talk:Tyson Fury

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tyson Fury. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 26 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Letupwasp. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply