Law & Disorder
question about edit summaries...
edit{{helpme}}
do people care about edit summaries? do people even see them?
- I'm just another editor who stumbled upon this, but yes, edit summaries are *very* important. See Help:Edit summary - Special-T 05:05, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, they do. They do see them. It's called a watchlist. Watch the page. I'll guarantee you that you'll see something. And one more thing. I don't think the username is WP:U. Check it out. -Goodshop 05:06, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Just being nice...
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by WP:U?
- Goodshop is asserting that your username is inappropriate. As an administrator I feel that you username is fine. Please do use edit summaries, they are important to summarize content. Keegantalk 05:30, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- thanks keegan. - Law & Disorder
- You can sign a page using four tildes, ~~~~. Keegantalk 05:47, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- ``Law & Disorder 06:10, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Law & Disorder, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Formatting on Wikipedia
editI saw your test edits, so I thought I'd let you know that in addition to wiki-formating we also support javascripts for aid in editing. Keegantalk 05:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- very nice. i will look into it. thanks! - Law & Disorder
Re-Naming of Miriam Gauci
editI have moved the page to the requested name. Feel free to contact me if you have any more questions or want some help. Tiddly-Tom 09:31, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- thank you for the help. Law & Disorder 17:42, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
The statements in question were placed only yesterday. Surely, a fact tag is a better idea than an unexplained deletion by an anonymous user with no other edits. Such edits always look like vandalism to me. I have placed a fact tag, and will request that the user who made the original edits offer a source. Thanks. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 19:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- so your just ok with a nonsensical statement in the article? Law/Disorder 19:50, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
File:Scharwenka2.jpg listed for discussion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Scharwenka2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:26, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Scharwenka2.jpg listed for discussion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Scharwenka2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 31 December 2018 (UTC)