Kolventra

Welcome!

Hi Kolventra! I noticed your contributions to Marvin's Marvelous Mechanical Museum (album) and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Belbury (talk) 17:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Alicia (album) featured article review

I have nominated Alicia (album) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. 𝒮𝒾𝓇 𝒯𝑒𝒻𝓁𝑜𝓃 (talk | contribs) 08:02, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Water slide page

On March 13, 2024 I added a paragraph to expand the information about body slides. You declined my change based on "advocacy" but I respectfully dispute this. I noted that the page is primarily focused on Proslide and WhiteWater West companies and their products. As an example, the header called Aqualoop is specifically a trademarked product from WhiteWater West. As a second example, the page refers to ProSlide Tornado. Based on this information, I think it is appropriate for my addition that discusses a smaller body slide - designed for kids - that was not included on the page. My addition is adding value because there was no previous mention of any smaller waterslides for kids. Note that the Wikipedia page is Vortex Aquatic Structures International and it is a credible company. Can you please review your position and reactivate the text. Thank you. TLJstone (talk) 12:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello TLJstone,

I undid your edit as it seemed to promote Vortex Aquatic Structures International. I do not doubt it is a credible company, however Wikipedia is also meant to be written in a neutral point of view. After reviewing the edit, I realize this may not have been your intent, but the way it was written suggested it was referring to the slides made specifically by Vortex Aquatic Structures International, and claiming that specifically (implying that only) their slides "help kids graduate from toddler rides to the real deal" and "offer just the right level of thrills" is advocacy. The way this differs from the examples you provided is the ProSlide Tornado and Aqualoop are both original concepts, while Vortex Aquatic Structures International did not invent body slides for kids. I do believe adding a mention of kids' slides could benefit the article, but if this company were to be mentioned, it should be after the description of kids' slides giving a notable example of their work on them. Thank you for reaching out. Kolventra (talk) 07:54, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Wikipedia:Userboxes/Sports/Gymnastics

Hello, Kolventra. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wikipedia:Userboxes/Sports/Gymnastics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Trampoline

Hello, thanks for your edit there, but I removed your citation as it got its text from Wikipedia. Graham87 (talk) 03:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

This doesn't surprise me as the article did look suspiciously like a Wikipedia article, but when I was researching the source I couldn't find any further evidence that was the case. Could you explain how you found out it was a circular source? Kolventra (talk) 13:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

I will avoid sources with overall phrasing that's very similar to the current Wikipedia page and articles that were published after the information was in Wikipedia with no additional sourcing. Kolventra (talk) 15:17, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)