Kdchan
August 2016
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to No Game No Life, did not appear constructive and have been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 12:09, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Provinding links or reference to validate these claims, one of the best things about wikipedia is resources and not personal opinions. Prividing a link and i stop editing otherwise i have the rights to remove it.
Ban my account make on effect unless you lock the whol page and validate my point, you don't have a link to validate that claim.
Thanks for read. ~~
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at No Game No Life. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 12:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Again, no resources provided but personal attacks. instead of attack me, validate your point providing links, if you don't do you don't have links and your claims are FALSE based on your own personal opinions. RE- edited.
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at No Game No Life.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. —Farix (t | c) 12:31, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Who are you to decide what people should or not write? I ask you to provide reference to a claim, you attack me and not providing reference, because is obvious you don't have these references.
You are disrupting wikipedia with false statements and lies.
Link reference to episode 1 is correct and a reliable source. However is not the review of the whole serie and should be pointed out, unless you provide links to the 12 episode full review where the reviewer made again this statement.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at No Game No Life. —Farix (t | c) 12:45, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
I do not vandalize wikipedia, i don't like personal opinions over real facts and statements, that's all, not providing facts mean i have right to edit until proven countrary. Blocking me and removing my freedom of speech is something you shouldn't never do, expecially because wikipedia is build thanks to the support of everyone.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 06:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)What? I was blocked even providing valid resources while the text is still there without any source? This make no sense at all, believe wikipedia basing articles on valid and reliable resources not on personal matters. also who decide what a personal matter is? Everyoen can contribute, and if valid resources are provided then the article ca nbe changed to meet new requirements.
Kdchan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I provide reliable resources of the claims reported in the main page, i will add these link resources the next time so everyone can read themselves the truth about these sentences
Decline reason:
Block extended for socking NeilN talk to me 12:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN talk to me 12:08, 8 August 2016 (UTC)You were informed several times by different editors that the statements in the lead section was a summation of reviews from the reception section and did not need to be recite per WP:LEADCITE. Your insistence that these statements be recited was not only disruptive, but an attempt to prove some sort of point. Now, you are use your IP to evade your block, which is simply not allowed under Wikipedia's blocking policy. —Farix (t | c) 12:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
My IP is dynamic so i dont' avoid anything, the issue however is not this, i want to speak with an administrator of some super mod of the anime portal to report abusing and blocking valid resources over mere sentences written based on personal opinions and no true facts. also we reach a compromise but you remove all the links you provide yesterday, dunno why if you take the time to add them, maybe because these links prove my point, that these sentences are just of SOME reviewers and not everyone. Seems the behaviour of a social justice warrior that try to denigrate something he don't like with fabrications. Is unaccettable.
- You were evading the block of this account. There are no "super mods" on Wikipedia. --NeilN talk to me 14:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Then i will submit a ticket and speak with an administrator, abusing mod power and refusal to admit my resources. Wikipedia is of everyone not only yours personal toy, you don't have any rights to decide alone what people should or nor write, expecially when people add resources but get ignored with blatant excuse and then blackmail people. Unacettable for a free encyclopedia.
- There is no ticket system on Wikipedia. And I suggest you read WP:CONSENSUS. "Wikipedia is of everyone not only yours personal toy" is correct and applies to you as well. --NeilN talk to me 14:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Seems is only your personal toy since the mod have the power to block my edits while i can't do anything, my edits are based on resouces i linked, but probalbly the mod never read or care to read since he just blackmail and leave the current text as absolute truth (feel i'm debating with a SJW or a random anime hater). Wikipedia is for everyone and everyone have different ways to express and post resources. I don't see any general consensus here or whatever this mean, just 1 mod that remove my edits based on his personal tastes, nothing else. No other people debate or are involved. I already openened a ticket from the blocking page, or there isn't anything to report moderation abusing? I don't believe it, more lies.
- Your first unblock request was declined by me. You are free to create another one. Before you do, I suggest you read WP:NOTTHEM. --NeilN talk to me 15:13, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Kdchan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Providing resources mean nothing seems, the moderator don't care to read them and just redo any change and continue to balckmail and block my account without any explanation, the text in the article seems the absolute truth and nothing nor everyone can be changed, even with unconfutable resources (that i provided). Also the moderator post himself some resources links yesterday, but for a unknow reason all these links were removed this morning, probably because they contain articles that prove my point (aka not every reviewers of the serie think so). So it become unfrotunately a personal grudge against my good intentions to improve the article and remove some negativity and lies, as a novel reader of such novel. Kdchan (talk) 15:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Edit-warring, sock-puppetry, WP:NOTTHEM. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:56, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Fine, since is useless having a pacefull debate, it will be tooth for tooth. Please delete my account immediately, thanks.
- See WP:DISAPPEAR. Block extended to indefinite, and your talk page access has been removed for making personal attacks. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:27, 8 August 2016 (UTC)