Kohraa Mondel

Welcome!

Hello, Kohraa Mondel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 20:46, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Nutcharut Wongharuthai moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nutcharut Wongharuthai, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/Germany medical cases chart

@Käptn Weltall: Thanks for keeping Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/Germany medical cases chart updated. I have a question about your latest edit. The RKI 29.03.2020 00:00 update does not appear on the given source [1] as of now.[2] If you have it from somewhere else, could you please add that source to the template? Renerpho (talk) 04:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

It's another RKI page with some graphical and interactive features that is directly linked on Fallzahlen.html. The figures usually appear there a bit earlier but are generally the same as those found at Fallzahlen.html. To avoid confusion I added that link to the template. --Käptn Weltall (talk) 07:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Attention needed at username change request

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:15, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

2020 coronavirus pandemic in Germany#Statistics Charts

Hello. I regularly maintain the daily figures from the Robert Koch Institute on this page. I see that you included two new charts (New cases per active case & new deaths per active case). Could you please let me know what is the source of this data and what is your formula for calculating these? JackUKElliott (talk) 07:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi JackUKElliott! Source is RKI. Active cases is cumulated cases minus recoveries minus deaths. New cases per active case is cumulated cases minus cumulated cases of the previous day divided by active cases of te previuous day multiplied by 100 yielding percentage. New deaths per active case is cumulated deaths minus cumulated deaths of the previous day divided by active cases of te previuous day multiplied by 100 yielding percentage. -- Kohraa Mondel (talk) 08:34, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Kohraa Mondel. Thank you for the clarification. I have one more question: Why do you use the previous day's cumulative number of cases for new cases and new deaths released today? Why are you not using the current day's figures for all? For example, on 20 April, RKI released 141,672 cumulative cases, 1,775 new cases, 4,404 cumulative deaths, 110 new deaths, 91,500 cumulative recoveries. On 21 April, RKI released 143,457 cumulative cases, 1,785 new cases, 4,598 cumulative deaths, 194 new deaths, 95200 cumulative recoveries. If I want to calculate New cases per active case for the latest released data on 21 April, I would be using the following formula: 1785/(143547-4598-95200)% and this would give me 4.09%. However, you seem to be using the following formula: 1785/(141672-4404-91500)%, which gives you 3.90%. Why are you diving today's release of new cases data to yesterday's release of cumulative cases, cumulative deaths and cumulative recoveries, instead of doing that division by today's released data? JackUKElliott (talk) 11:29, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

To depict development. I assume those newly infected within one day to be infected by those that have been actively carrying the corona virus before the beginning of the interval of consideration (a day). The same goes for deaths. If you have a look at the cumulative cases at the top of the article, you'll also see the daily percentage calculated on the basis of the previous days cumulated cases: For April 21 it's (143457-141672)/141672 = 0.013 = 1.3%. -- Kohraa Mondel (talk) 11:46, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. Which article are you referring to? JackUKElliott (talk) 12:04, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

The article heading this paragraph, for unknown reasons within chapter 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Germany#Timeline_by_state you'll find figure COVID-19 cases in Germany at the top left. -- Kohraa Mondel (talk) 12:13, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Filipino mestizo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ati. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:17, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

2021–22 snooker season/Century breaks moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2021–22 snooker season/Century breaks, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:18, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2021–22 snooker season/Century breaks (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lee Vilenski was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2021–22 snooker season/Century breaks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2021–22 snooker season/Century breaks, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:38, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Kohraa Mondel! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:38, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2021–22 snooker season/Century breaks

Hello, Kohraa Mondel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2021–22 snooker season/Century breaks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:38, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2021–22 snooker season/Century breaks

Hello, Kohraa Mondel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Century breaks".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:02, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)