User talk:Jeff G./Archives/2011/July
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Not a personal attack on the bot...
- Not meant to be a personal attack on the bot. :) :) but a tongue in cheek chide of the bot. Of course it does not suck, met to be a somewhat funny actually. But the bot does have issues though. Bot should be looking at one those that use a www field in the cite area. Not journals or book or whatever else. DeusImperator (talk) 11:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- This edit didn't include the words "idiot editors"? Also, cite templates have no "www" fields and I haven't run the bot in over three weeks due to other concerns. — Jeff G. ツ 12:43, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
References
Hey, Sorry about the citing, I just figured that since MLB.com was already referenced on the last change on made to the Wade LeBlanc page I didn't think I had to cite it again. Anyways, is their an easy template to use for citing then?
Thanks for the help.
Detredwings1139 (talk) 19:09, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- "per mlb.com (already a ref)" should do nicely. A more specific URL would be better. — Jeff G. ツ 19:11, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for including a ref on a later edit. You may want to stop adding height and weight for MLB players after you read Template talk:Infobox MLB player#Height_and_weight, where the consensus was not to add them to the infobox. — Jeff G. ツ 19:32, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Oh, sorry about that. Didn't realize it wasn't supposed to be added.
vandal
please tell me how changing "partner" to "relationship" can be consindered vadalisum??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.224.188.94 (talk) 19:11, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- "Relationship" is not a valid parameter for Template:Infobox person. Neither is "fucking"[1]. The correct parameter name is "partner" per Template:Infobox person/doc, and since you effectively removed the information about the partner of James Roday from the James Roday article, I interpreted your edit as "unexplained removal of content" AKA vandalism. — Jeff G. ツ 19:19, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Help
hello there
the page which I created I need some help UKRockers , many users keep trying to remove it as they state there is no reason for it but I and many others think it does
can you help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarvis1983uk (talk • contribs) 19:56, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- The article needs to satisfy WP:CLUB, in addition to providing verifiable references from reliable sources. It did not appear to do that when you wrote to me. — Jeff G. ツ 20:45, 31 July 2011 (UTC)